Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Takket

(21,611 posts)
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 01:39 PM Feb 2016

Cruz: Obama has neglected the military

I just... I can't even........ process the dumb.

We spend more money on our military than countries 2-9 combined. There is no country on the planet that could resist us in war. and the problem is we are not spending ENOUGH?????????

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ted-cruz-assails-obama-years-neglect-us-military/story?id=36971348

Aboard a decommissioned World War II-era battleship here, Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz unveiled a sweeping plan to rebuild the U.S. armed forces, arguing that the military “has fallen to the bottom” of President Obama’s priority list.

“If there is a silver lining in the Obama-Clinton foreign policy debacle, it is that now we know what a world without America would start to look like,” the Texas senator said. “Far more dangerous and beholden to terrorists and criminal regimes.”

Less than a week before the South Carolina primary, the Texas senator offered his ideas for expanding the size of the military, in both equipment and personnel, bolstering bases, updating technology and improving services for veterans. His guiding principle, he said, would be simple: “more tooth, less tail.”

“Starting next year our sailors won’t be on their knees with their hands on their heads,” Cruz said referring to the U.S. sailors who were held in Iranian custody after their ship entered that country’s waters. “Our secretary of state will not be apologizing and thanking their Iranian captors. Instead, they will be standing on the decks of the mightiest ships the world has ever known with their heads held high, confident that the great country that they volunteered to serve has their back."

Cruz called for an increase in the active duty military force to 1.4 million in order to be prepared for the "possibility of multiple, near-simultaneous conflicts” on the world stage. He also promised to review the Marine Corps' request "for an exemption from the policy requiring women to serve in combat positions.”

He also expressed his belief that women should not be drafted into the combat roles in the military.

“After seven years of neglect,” he said, “it is time for America to once again prioritize a strong, advanced and robust military.”

Another theme emerged throughout his remarks: An end to “political correctness” in military matters.

“The last thing any commander should need to worry about is the grades he is getting from some plush-bottomed Pentagon bureaucrat for political correctness or social experiments or providing gluten-free MREs,” he said of ready-to-eat meals . “If I am elected president, one of my first orders to the secretary of defense will be to restore the U.S. military’s combat ethos.”

Cruz was introduced today by Rick Perry, the former Texas governor and U.S. Air Force veteran who endorsed Cruz after ending his own presidential bid last year.

As he campaigns all week in South Carolina, Cruz, 45, has been fending off scathing attacks from his rivals, particularly Donald Trump and Sen. Marco Rubio. And although his speech largely focused on policy rather than the skirmishes of the Republican Party nominating contest, he offered a nod to Palmetto State.

“I am grateful that South Carolina works to provide a wonderful home to our veterans, and even more so now under Governor [Nikki] Haley’s leadership,” he said. “It’s time our national programs match that excellence.”

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cruz: Obama has neglected the military (Original Post) Takket Feb 2016 OP
For Republicans, more military is good ShrimpPoboy Feb 2016 #1
I have watched all their debates and forums. SamKnause Feb 2016 #2
There is a lot of retired military in SC and other southern states underpants Feb 2016 #3
Fuck You Ted Cruz......Fuuuuuuuuck Yoooooouuuuuuuuu thelordofhell Feb 2016 #4

ShrimpPoboy

(301 posts)
1. For Republicans, more military is good
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 01:42 PM
Feb 2016

And less is bad. It doesn't matter what we already have, what we need it for, or the cost.

SamKnause

(13,108 posts)
2. I have watched all their debates and forums.
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 01:48 PM
Feb 2016

They are all identically themed:

War

Terror

Rebuild our tiny defenseless military

Lower taxes on the rich and corporations

Calling attention to what good Christians they all profess to be

The country has went downhill fast during the Obama administration

Everything problem this country has is because of Obama, liberals, not

enough God worship.

underpants

(182,865 posts)
3. There is a lot of retired military in SC and other southern states
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 01:55 PM
Feb 2016

Cruz is clearly betting the bank on the SEC primary. From the commercial with the Duck Dynasty guy to "New York values" to this. He knows that the winners on March 1 will probably be the nominees.

thelordofhell

(4,569 posts)
4. Fuck You Ted Cruz......Fuuuuuuuuck Yoooooouuuuuuuuu
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 01:58 PM
Feb 2016
http://correctrecord.org/the-gop-on-veterans-issues/


TED CRUZ

EDUCATION

Ted Cruz voted to block further action on a bill that would have enhanced benefits for veterans including guaranteeing in-state tuition rates at all public universities for post-9/11 veterans. “Senate Republicans derailed efforts to move forward with a $21 billion bill to enhance health care, education and job benefits for veterans. Republicans stopped the veterans bill from moving on a procedural vote, which needed 60 votes. The final tally was 56-41. Republicans and Democrats normally agree on the need to enhance benefits for the nation’s 22 million veterans and their families, but Republican senators wanted to lower the amount of spending in the bill… The bill would have improved benefits for veterans, including better health care and dental services provided by the VA. It also would have guaranteed post-9/11 veterans access to in-state tuition rates at public colleges and universities in any state.” [ABC News, 2/27/14; S. 1928, 2/3/14]

SPOUSAL BENEFITS

Ted Cruz voted against legislation that would ensure that “all legally married same-sex spouses have equal access to the Social Security and veterans benefits they have earned.” In 2015, Paul voted against an amendment that would “establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to ensuring all legally married same-sex spouses have equal access to the Social Security and veterans benefits they have earned and receive equal treatment under the law pursuant to the Constitution of the United States.” The Senate adopted the proposed amendment to the Senate’s FY 2016 budget resolution by a vote of 57 to 43, and later passed the amended resolution. [Senate roll call vote 121, 3/26/15; S. Amdt. 1063 to S. Con. Res. 11, 3/26/15]

VA FUNDING

Ted Cruz voted against providing $27 million for the Veterans Health Administration, as part of a $50.5 billion Superstorm Sandy recovery package. In January 2013, Paul voted against a bill that, according to Congressional Quarterly, included provisions that “appropriate[d] the following amounts: […] Department of Veterans Affairs —$27 million through fiscal 2014 for the Veterans Health Administration, including $21 million for medical services and $6 million for medical facilities expenses. —$1.1 million for the National Cemetery Administration. —$531,000 for information technology systems. —$207 million for major construction projects through fiscal 2017.” The provisions were part of a larger bill that, according to Congressional Quarterly, “provide[d] about $50.5 billion for communities hit by Superstorm Sandy. Nearly all funding [was] designated as emergency spending exempt from discretionary caps, except for $5.4 billion for the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Disaster Relief Fund.” The Senate passed the bill by a vote of 62 to 36; and, because the House had already approved the bill, it was then sent to the president, who signed it into law. [Senate roll call vote 4, 1/28/13; Congressional Quarterly, 1/28/13; Congressional Actions, H.R. 152; Congressional Quarterly, 1/30/13]

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Cruz: Obama has neglected...