2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDeeply Offensive: Clinton Supporters Mock Iraq War with Drinking Game
Since the 2003 invasion, 4,486 Americans have died in Iraq, over 500,000 Iraqis have been killed, and ISIS now controls the entire region. Clinton has admitted that her Iraq vote was a huge mistake. And yet, in an effort to belittle Sanders, her supporters have shamelessly turned the very mention ofIraq into a home drinking game for their own amusement.
A lot more worth reading. This writer is seriously ticked:
http://vetsforbernie.org/2016/02/clinton-fans-mock-iraq-vote/
dchill
(38,539 posts)for those Clinton supporters. I'm sure they're not ALL so callous.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)dchill
(38,539 posts)onecaliberal
(32,898 posts)tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Libya, Syria, Iraq
Three countries, amoung others, who were in the crosshairs of the neocon gang back in the '90s. part of their grand plan for domination over the worlds fossil fuel resources.
Makes you wonder what a POTUS Hillary would do with the Iran agreement.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)as long as Democrats support it.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Maybe they have stock in those companies?
ALBliberal
(2,344 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)1 supporter does not speak for all of us. Please stop making us out to be calloused evil people. We're not!
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Especially given her vote on the war.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)She was lied to by the Bush admin and SHE had to vote how her constituents would have expexted. Besides, Bush went against the UN he was going to do it no matter what. Americans are violent by history and nature.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)rubberstamp for the bloodlust revenge of some of your constituents, and that that excuses a vote that others correctly made, and for prescient reasons.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)some of it even with us who said 'no'. Sadly.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)But not all of it.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Not everyone fell for it.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)The names Clinton and Kerry come to mind.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)There were plenty of people actually in New York during 9/11 that didn't fall for Bush's lies.
If simply being a Senator makes her a credulous idiot, that's not exactly a compliment
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)It was an evil lie by Bush and co
smiley
(1,432 posts)or complicit in the lie. Neither is someone I want as president.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)They were all from NY (where it happened!!) and still they voted no because 9-11 was not really connected to Iraq, was it? No, it wasn't.
9-11 hit New Jersey hard as well, many NJ residents killed across that little river. One of the two NJ Democratic Senators voted No. Why? Iraq and 9-11 were unrelated.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Sorry. You and all the classless Hillary supporters own this too. It's what she, and you have created. As a vet I am appalled by the whole lot of you.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)SamKnause
(13,110 posts)Some assholes are just bigger than others.
This is an example of real assholery.
C Moon
(12,221 posts)but I don't this kind of assholery is a fair sample of how Clinton supporters think.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)Deny anything bad about her or her supporters, provide no information. Just, "Clinton farts unicorn who, in turn, fart rainbows and thus every yacht is lifted.
You could be replaces with a simple Perl program:
while(1) { print "Clinton is goodn"; }
That would provide exactly as much information and analysis as you provide and as such, would carry the same informational content. It seems likely that you generate a whole lot more entropy in the process, so the above program is a lot more efficient. You could do the environment a lot of good by substituting the above program for yourself.
On edit, changed 'n' to 'n'.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)Where!? Where did the little fucker go! I'll kick its ass!
Actually, I see where I added an "n", but I don't see where I missed one. And in the interest of full disclosure, I have been drinking
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)It seems that DU doesn't display backslashes properly.
Surely it cannot be relied on for the more exotic characters in that special character soup that is Perl
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)DU is messing with my (inebriated) head Dereference this, beeotch!
tblue37
(65,488 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)It is seriously hsrd tp type.
'n stuff.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)Hillary supporters aren't the most articulate.
msongs
(67,443 posts)PonyUp
(1,680 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)the lack of respect shown by Clinton supporters is beyond repugnant and enough for me to lose all respect for their candidate
Only I'm not going where you think I am with this.
Blaming the candidate for everything negative done by people who claim to support that candidate.
It happens on both sides and it's not the candidate's fault.
I don't know what Clinton would do if she saw these tweets, and neither do you.
One thing I do know, is if these Hillary supporters are making his words into a drinking game to ridicule Bernie when he points out the different between himself and Hillary on important decisions like war...they are scared of this difference. Otherwise, they could care less what he says.
They are trying to laugh it off because they know it might hurt Hillary a lot, so they try to belittle his words, and him.
Put it in that perspective and maybe it won't make everyone so angry.
NanceGreggs
(27,818 posts)The (alleged) game is about how often BS raises the topic of the Iraq War - it has nothing to do with what he says about it, what he did about it, how he voted - nothing.
Do you really think that when people get together to play a drinking game it's about "belittling Bernie"? To what end? To influence the political thinking of the friends they're playing a drinking game with?
"Ya know, I was a staunch Bernie supporter, until I got together with the gang for a drinking game. Completely turned me around."
Are you serious?
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:43 AM - Edit history (1)
Don't worry. Nobody really cares what Hillary does with her cool drinking buddies such as John McCain and Henry Kissinger.
NanceGreggs
(27,818 posts)... who laughed at the "take a shot whenever Guiliani mentions 9/11" game were drinking to the Twin Towers coming down.
Right. Got it.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)"We came, we saw, he died."
There's a lot of compassion there, if you're a heartless dictator.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I have no problem with putting blame where it belongs.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)So it's not surprising her supporters feel the same.
What are some of those videos where Hillary was laughing so inappropriately? Wasn't it about nuking Iran or something? Real funny.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Edited to add: Why it isn't funny ---> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/politics/hillary-clinton-libya.html?_r=1
Merryland
(1,134 posts)how far have we come down as a nation that someone like this could be considered presidential.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)But then I guess the supporters don't fall far from the tree.
.
onenote
(42,767 posts)First, there are assholes amongst the supporters of all campaigns.
Second, it strikes me as having no more impact than the drinking games that were often promoted amongst Democrats (including here at DU) during the Bush years, when any mention of 9-11 required you to take a drink. I could see how some people might think that was insensitive but I don't recall it becoming much of a story.
Skittles
(153,193 posts)PersonNumber503602
(1,134 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Not a gimmick someone is hiding behind.
People used to hide behind 911 to justify all manner of unrelated polcies.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)to conflate assholes with all Sanders supporters, then they are going to have the same thing with their own assholes.
If the Clinton supporters want to now claim the assholes are not representative, they need to stop making that claim about Sanders supporters.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)leaves the whole world blind.
It's never a good argument when "but they do it" is contained in the argument.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Or do you think hypocrisy is a positive trait?
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Isn't that the problem, you don't actually know who "they" are?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)So clearly I must have no clue what "they" refers to.
Oh wait! I can actually follow a thread and don't get lost when pronouns show up.
Yes, very funny.
You still assume more than I do.
You win this thread!
I don't get threads like this.
Characterizing all supporters of one candidate by the actions of a few knuckleheads is not in our best interest.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)Could it be that Sanders supporters blame the war on Clinton, and her supporters are tired of that lie? Could it be that Bernie is playing off that and trowing red meat to his fan base?
Could it be that this has nothing to do with the troops or the war and everything to do with Clinton's opponents playing politics with the war?
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)All the shit Sanders supporters on the internet throw.
I thought conservatives were outrage merchants. Well they ain't got nothing on Sanders' people.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)If you personally don't need it, give it to another Hillary supporter who does.
I don't see how this OP has anything to do with any shit flinging by Bernie supporters, can you explain?
.
dchill
(38,539 posts)Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)Shit such as this.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1355553
cui bono
(19,926 posts)And for every link you give me that you consider shit flinging from Bernie supporters I can give you at least 2 from Hillary supporters. Plus I can give you links to 2 websites by Hillary supporters that were set up for the sole purpose of shit flinging and spewing vile hatred. So you can save that false accusations. I see you do need that mirror after all.
Now back to the OP. What is it about the OP that is shit flinging?
.
Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)One, there is no context to the OP. Yet the OP and the majority of the Bernie respondents assume that the intent is disrespect for the military and a cruel disregard for the Iraq invasion.
That my friend is two things.
It is an attempt at being an outrage merchant and/or it is an argument from ignorance.
There are many more explanations for those tweets although none of them are friendly to Bernie many if not most of them have nothing to do with denigrating anyone else.
But the Bernie supporters aren't interested in finding out what really motivated those people when they can pretend to be outraged by their own interpretation.
It is shit flinging to take an act or statement out of context, put the worst spin on it, and use that invented "truth" to attack ones adversaries.
It's what the media and conservatives did to Al Gore, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama in past elections. It is also what Bill Bradley and Nader did in 2000 and now what Bernie's supporters are doing in 2016.
In short the OP is making shit up and flinging it.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)So what is the context that is missing? Can you provide it? Did you see the tweets? Looks pretty clear to me what's going on. If it's not accurate then please show it. Not a generalization of what shit flinging means, but the actual shit flinging you are accusing the OP of being.
.
Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)And that prediction came through in flying colors.
Have a nice life and remember to vote.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)And can't show the context that you claim is missing.
Oh well. Nice of you to try and hide that with condescension.
.
autonomous
(45 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)Not of backing the war.
First the AUMF was not an authorization to invade without cause. Bush ignored most of the provisions of the AUMF most importantly by not letting the weapons inspectors continue their work.
He invaded in spite of the AUMF not because of it.
The politics part was the main failure. The democrats were being lambasted in the media and by the republicans for being unpatriotic. Given that it was part of the media narrative, it looked as if there was no way for the democrats to make headway in the 2002 mid-terms.
So the democratic leadership (wrongly) decided to draw the fangs of the anti-American narrative by throwing a bone to the media. That bone was the AUMF.
We know now that it didn't work. The media and conservatives still played the anti-American narrative against the democrats and Bush wrongly used the AUMF as an excuse to invade. The result was losses in the 2002 bi-election.
Clinton was one of many democrats that voted for the AUMF, but not one of the members of the leadership that conceived of it as ploy.
Once the invasion was a fait accompli most people fell into "support the troops" mode, including Bernie Sanders. That was a bad political move as well.
The AUMF failed as a political ploy because it did not take into consideration the purfidy of the American media and how invested the media was in promoting war. It also didn't take into consideration how rash and stupid the Bush administration would be in invading a country without cause.
In hindsight it's easy to see and at the time there were people pointing out both things. I was one of them, but none of those people had the power to change events, especially with the media being against them.
So my point? A failed political gambit is not the same as an illegal invasion of a sovereign nation. Clinton and the rest of the democratic leadership failed, but it was George W. Bush that invaded.
What would have happened if there was no AUMF and the democrats had stood up to he media and Bush? We don't know.
I suspect the end result would have been the same.
So why are those people making drinking games about Bernie's mentions of his vote? I don't know. But a possible explanation is that they consider it to be a dog whistle blaming Hillary Clinton for starting the war. If that is what they believe then their actions are understandable.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)by her supporters
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)At first I didn't believe you, because I couldn't believe such assholary was possible, but then I click on the article and saw it had screenshots of the post from mocking Iraq. The truth is I don't want to believe it, but I can't ignore the evidence.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)They think it's just a political issue, not a life or death issue for millions of people.
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)is that they are in a bubble. They probably don't know someone they close with who is or was in the military. They also don't know the devastation the war has wrought on the people of Iraq, and they ignore the vast consequences the Iraq war had on the entire Middle East.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)candidate for States Attorney in Morgan County Illinois.
http://votemanker.com/meet-tyson/
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Thanks for that
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)He seams to be cleaning houses on his way. There is a lot of cleaning to be done between State's Attorney and U.S. Congressman. There is a donation link on his site, if I had some disposable income I would contribute.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)... where she looks under a table, "Nope, no dead soldiers here," then looks under a desk and says, "No dead soldiers under this," and then looks out the window...
It's pretty funny, and not just a bit sad, that now Clinton supporters are, in effect, Bush supporters.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)What the fuck is wrong with these people?
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Just guessing.
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)from the cost of the Iraq war. They might as well made their status, "let them eat cake".
amborin
(16,631 posts)jmowreader
(50,562 posts)What we are mocking is Bernie's parrot-like "Iraq War! Iraq War!" attacks. And guess what: They SHOULD be attacked!
I would love to be Hillary at the next debate...
"Hillary voted for the Iraq War!"
'Yes, Bernie, I did. It was the biggest mistake I ever made and I've apologized for it repeatedly. Now let's talk about something that's REALLY important: What funding sources are you going to tap into when it turns out your health care plan calculations are $3 trillion too low?"
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)jmowreader
(50,562 posts)malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)constant acts of censorship? Also as for your commenting being a very good one I guess I will have to take your word for it.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts). . . aren't you from Idaho?
Obama took Idaho back in 2008.
And it was the Iraq War, and Hillary's support for that war, which was why Obama won in this state.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)I don't think it was a mistake in the first place. How the fuck do you mistakenly invade and occupy a country for 12 years?
People who make those "mistakes" shouldn't be rewarded with higher office.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)War Hawk mistakes...as in Libya...where she took get joy in murder...
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)as a wife of an Iraq war veteran...you guys are really going to win converts making fun of vets... and a bad policy decision.
That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)are very real.
It's disgusting that you defend this.
I put on par with Sandy Hook "truthers".
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)She just brushes it off like it was a minor issue.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Then there are Hillary supporters, who criticize those people.
/ignore your bullshit.
pkdu
(3,977 posts)Poor taste possibly , but not making fun of vets or war.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)And then daring to raise it as a political issue.
We haven't talked about it nearly enough.
Nyan
(1,192 posts)Bernie has addressed internet trolls. Will Hillary address these people? Will media ask her questions about this? Don't hold your breath.
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)Now that you mentioned Republicans the Iraq war drinking game reminds me of the purple heart band aids used to mock Kerry during the 2004 election.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Thespian2
(2,741 posts)would, of course, back the most pathetic, non-progressive candidate...
NanceGreggs
(27,818 posts)... and assuming this is even factual, it's a drinking game based on how often Bernie brings up the fact that he voted against the IWR. It has nothing to do with the actual war itself.
I remember posters here laughing about a similar game that involved taking a drink every time Guiliani mentioned 9/11 when he was running for the GOP candidacy. Are you seriously suggesting that that game was premised on mocking the victims of that event?
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Hillary has repeatedly supported forcible regime change in middle east countries: Iraq, Libya, and Syria. Thanks to those policies the whole fucking middle east is now crawling with terrorists. Bad fucking move.
She also has on more than one occasion laughed really innapropriately when asked about matters of war and death in over there. She said Iraqi's should be grateful we gave them the "gift of freedom". She pals around with Kissinger and said Iraq is now a great business opportunity.
Yes the Iraq War is very relevant and important. Only assholes laugh at Senator Sanders for talking about Iraq.
NanceGreggs
(27,818 posts)... that is allegedly being played. I doubt that Hillary is playing it herself - so what she has to do with what her supporters allegedly do is beyond me.
As I've already pointed out, it's not about IRAQ - it's about how often Bernie brings up the topic of Iraq.
And as I have also already pointed out, many posters here laughed at the "Take-a-shot every time Guiliani mentions 9/11 game". So it IS the same thing, unless you're saying that they were all laughing at the people who died in that tragedy.
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)supporters are doing has nothing to do with her? Well Clinton supporters and the media was blaming Sanders for the Bernie Bros.
NanceGreggs
(27,818 posts)Do you think that the DU posters here who laughed at the "Take a shot every time Guiliani mentions 9/11" game were laughing at the people who died on 9/11?
It's a simple question. Yes or no?
djean111
(14,255 posts)replay with an inane non-sequitur or smilies! Didn't you get the memo? Just read this thread to see what I mean!
AzDar
(14,023 posts)Beacool
(30,253 posts)Every time he is asked a foreign policy question in a debate he falls back to his usual response that he didn't vote for the war in Iraq. It's like Giuliani and 9/11.
SunSeeker
(51,715 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)It's how Hillary fans roll.
You're OK with it.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)equality. Jesus said this about those who make peace:
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the children of God.
This game, the best excuse for it you have it that it mocks a man for trying to make peace.
I have big, giant issues with people who say 'The Bible is my guide so no gay rights' who then do something like mock the peacemakers whom Jesus set apart for praise specific to their peace seeking actions. They will be called the children of God but also made fun of by those who claim to 'follow Jesus'.
So what you are saying is they were 'just' shitting on the words of the Christ to make fun of peacemakers in support of a candidate who claims to be a big, giant Christian. Got it.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)insisting that a few supporters don't represent everyone.
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)Clinton supporters be given the benefit of the doubt in regards to this travesty when all Bernie supporters were tarred as "Bernie Bros" by Clinton supporters and the media? I even saw a post here implying Bernie supporters were like the Red Guard during the Cultural Revolution in China.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)The people that insist a handful of Sanders supporters totally represent all Sanders supporters, and even Sanders himself sometimes, are the ones insisting it doesn't work that way for them.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)For much the same reason that the bandaids mocking Kerry's purple heart should have turned anyone still in doubt, away from G.W. Bush.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Perhaps they take as a role model Hillary, who finds time to laugh at the most inopportune times, enough so that commercials are already being made about it.
Wish it really was funny where we are today.
senz
(11,945 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)If so they never served in a combat zone before they got separated.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)I they a least had hang over, but really bringing back the draft would be better.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Mandatory military service at 18. Teach our people that we aren't some chip to be used in games of political one-upsmanship and interventionism. Maybe foster some better politicians while we're at it.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)When you can't glean anything but a reason to drink for your hearing Sanders talk about his ability to make a decision NOT to support that mistake, you have a decision to make:
1) You can treat this election like it's some kind of game, and bury any cognitive process of why these issues must be examined.
2) Or, you can stop this excuse for blacking out in a half hour, as some of you are want to do, according to your tweets. Just take the whole bottle or keg and crawl into it, curl up and go to sleep forever...
Eventually, as some of you are bound to find, it matters what we do for the rest of our lives. It matters to deal with where most of the U.S. budget has gone and for what reason. We tell our strongest and hardest working young people who go into the military that how they lay their lives on the line is nothing but a drinking game.
Tell that to somebody in your family that was given to order to go into another country and occupy it for the huge dollars lining military industrialists, or oil and gas giants under the direction of Dick Cheney.
You want to get drunk until you can't deal with reality, until you HAVE to deal with reality? Reality is here. I don't care how many times you hear the issues. THEY ARE WITH US.
Deal with it.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)LexVegas
(6,098 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)LexVegas
(6,098 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)the reckless greed of your big banks and Wall Street dipshits.
Hahahahha. Point and laugh at the guy who raises the issue in politics. Hahaha.
/sarcasm
True colors. Hillary supporters are showing them.
betsuni
(25,636 posts)"Scalia is dead! This is no longer a game. Hillary must be stopped." Who is drinking what?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)so that Clinton supporters will all be so blitzed they can't vote?
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)Compared to mean ol' "Berniebros" that keep on quoting HRC to make her look bad. After all, this was just a war where people died, lost limbs, friends, family, their sanity etc.
Always remember: Service members are simply fodder to be used by politicians to gain credibility, wealth and influence while said politician's reputation is sacrosanct.
sarcasm
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Your post hit the nail on the head.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)This is disgusting. However, I don't let the actions of a candidate's supporters sway my opinion of the candidate and I can honestly say that my opinion of candidate Clinton does not change due to the cold hearted, war hawking, regime change loving players of this game.
kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)"Support the Troops" was just a slogan, after all.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)Iraq is a point that Sanders - correctly - brings up often. I also suspect that when he does, most Clinton supporters react viscerally, because I think all of us here wish no Democrats voted Yes -- no matter what they said or did afterward.
Trivializing Sander's mentioning of it is perhaps a strange way of dealing with that. The problem I have is how it fits into Clinton's entire foreign policy. It is not an aberration, but actually the norm. Consider that in 2006, she was furious with Kerry and Feingold for their resolution because she and Senators allied with her argued that the Democrats were better off not making any exit from Iraq an issue. It was after 2006 became a referendum on Iraq and even Republicans like Hagel and John Warner returned from visits to Iraq move open to the idea and a study group pretty much backed the idea, that Clinton's 2008 platform changed to a variation of it.
As SoS, using her own book and her own interviews, she was a hawkish influence in Obama's cabinet. She pushed for an even greater surge in Afghanistan, the action in Libya, and still argues that they should have done more for the "moderate" Syrians and STILL speaks up for a Syrian no fly zone - even after the Russians were there. She wisely played with the question of whether we would shot a Russian plane down that violated that zone -- unlike Christie, but given that ISIS has no planes -- the no fly zone would have to be against Syria and now Russia.
Given that she will not have a Democratic House and anywhere near 60 Democrats in the Senate, it is on foreign policy that she would have the most ability to do things she wants. My question to HRC supporters, is are you in agreement with Clinton on foreign policy?
- ie did you support the Libya effort morphing from protecting people from a massacre to regime change? Do you support a no fly zone in Syria and further arming the "moderate" rebels? DO you agree with HRC second guessing Obama years later about leaving Iraq according to the approved Bush plan - even knowing we could not get a SoFA?
For the years as SOS, we have the luxury of knowing her actual positions -- not the constrained choice of yes or no on a bill where your real answer is yes, but or no, but. Some of those positions, we know from what she wrote in her memoir - they represent at least what she thought was the correct position in 2013/2014.
It is that question, more than a silly drinking game that supposedly some supporters play, that should be the issue. Will she takes us internationally where we want to go?
John Poet
(2,510 posts)but Hillary got her war anyway. "Take a drink!"
Hillary supporters seem concerned ONLY with winning. Being on the right side of progressive issues means little to them, as long as they get their president.
artislife
(9,497 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)unfortunately, this country isn't as anti-war on the whole as to make that a viable response.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)In almost every debate when he's asked about foreign policy his standard response has been that he didn't vote for the war in Iraq. After a while people started counting how many times he kept saying it. That's what's funny. Just like with Giuliani and his fallback response of how he handled the aftermath of 9/11. Obviously, neither subject is funny. What's funny is how often these two politicians fell back on their respective memes. Sort of like Rubio bashing Obama using the same line of attack so often that Christie called him out on it during a Republican debate.
The fake outrage over here is also highly amusing in its disingenuity.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)The other huge lie- trying to bash Clinton on "compromising" on abortion rights is so crazy I can't figure out if
people spreading it are actually progressive. I have to think they are not. From where I sit, we don't lie about important shit like that.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)Some of his supporters can't imagine why would anyone not prefer Sanders. Steady as she goes wins the race, I have no doubt that Hillary will be the nominee.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)this to support a candidate who voted for that horrible war in between citing the Bible as reason for her to oppose LGBT civil rights. The Bible, Jesus himself says 'Blessed are the peacemakers, they will be called the children of God'. So Hillary, she follows the Bible to oppose people, but her supporters think it's ok to mock the peacemakers? How does that work exactly? Is there a copy of the Hillary Functional Bible I can get so I know when stuff like 'Blessed are the peacemakers' is replaced with materials about 'taking pot shots at peacemakers while chugging boilermakers'?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)of 9/11, nor is this one of the Iraq war. That is bullshit, and I suspect the OP knows it.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)But, but, but, Hillary votes FOR the war . . . and then you say foreign policy is not Bernie's forte.
That statement is so rich with irony, you should open an irony mine!!!!
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)ozone_man
(4,825 posts)who helped give us Iraq, Lybia, and Syria atrocities? I hope not. She and Kissinger are of the same thing ilk. Let's go beyond war!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)With something about "the heroin crisis"
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)That obviously means that she approves of this wholeheartedly!
I like her, but her unremittingly callous and inhuman supporters will be her downfall!