2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOhio may historically be a "swing state," but it has already swung for 2012 (to Obama)
The polling for Ohio this election has looked more similar to Pennsylvania than is has to FL, VA and CO.
I posit that FL, VA and CO are the only unswung states in 2012 (with the slight possibility that NH is still in play, but irrelevant to electoral math). I am also conceding that NC has probably moved to Romney's column, but would love to be wrong on that.
OH, though, is in the column with PA, MI, WI and IA where Romney has never once had or held a lead in aggregate polling. It has never truly been in play. Obama carried it comfortably in 2008, and the unemployment is lower in OH than nationally. Add to that the outstanding early voting numbers coming from OH for Obama and it is clear Ohio is not in play, if it ever actually was.
That means, even if NH goes to Romney. And even if Romney picked up NC, CO, VA and FL as well, he would still lose.
In other words, Romney, to win, in addition to running the board (on NC, VA, CO, VA, FL and NH) would have to flip either OH, WI or MI. Taking IA alone wouldn't do it, nor would NV alone.
In OH, WI, and MI Romney has never led in the polling average. Never.
Ohio: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/ohio_election_2012_vs_election_2008_four_years_ago_today.html
Wisconsin: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/wisconsin_election_2012_vs_election_2008_four_years_ago_today.html
Michigan: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/wisconsin_election_2012_vs_election_2008_four_years_ago_today.html
This election is not nearly as close as the repubs or the media would have you believe. In fact, the electoral math against Romney is damn near insurmountable at this point.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)A small, but great success.
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)Kablooie
(18,641 posts)donco
(1,548 posts)but i think that the show-me state (Mo)could go Obamas way this year.Odd Todd pissed a lot of women off.
Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)SIGN the petition @ Change.org petition FOR Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate the Romney Family Connection to VOTING MACHINES & add INVESTIGATE Hart Intercivic board of directors, Neil Tuch & Jeff Bohl in the free space line.
with 34,737 supporters
263 NEEDED
http://www.change.org/petitions/attorney-general-eric-holder-investigate-tagg-romney-owning-voting-machines-in-ohio
FROM FORBES ARTICLE <snip>
Hart Intercivic board of directors, Neil Tuch and Jeff Bohl, have made direct contributions to the Romney campaign.
JackN415
(924 posts)Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)SOME GREAT COMMENTS
Sacramento, CA
2 days ago Liked 135
The son of a candidate running for President should NOT be allowed to own voting machines, that is so ridiculous!
new york, NY
2 days ago Liked 111
I remember what happened in Ohio in 2004, thats why.
Hewitt, TX
2 days ago Liked 102
The son of a presidential candidate owning voting machines is absolutely unacceptable. It's most definitely a conflict of interest and should be forbidden.
Vida, OR
2 days ago Liked 84
It should be obvious! CONFLICT OF INTEREST. All electronic voting should be banned.
Spring Green, WI
2 days ago Liked 80
This is a conflict of interest and not acceptable. Potential criminal activity - if we don't have a choice in the end... people will feel why vote at all?
trayfoot
(1,568 posts)Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)Cosmocat
(14,572 posts)I think most people here know the point you are making.
And, this is why Silver's model and intrade and most cumulative rankings have BO at a 65 to romney 35 to win the presidency.
And, with early voting in Ohio, the cake is already fairly baked.
I will make these points;
1) It has been so volatile since the first debate, that there still is a CHANCE this thing turns against BO, and it could spill over to Ohio. Not a good chance, but possible. I was feeling better a few days ago, but there already is some erosion from the momentum that bo was able to generate from the second debate. The election can not possibly come soon enough.
2) Part of my, and I think other folks "concern" is the margin of victory. of course they Rs are going to be complete dicks regardless, but the closer the election, the more that it helps to justify their wanting to de-legitimize a BO win and second term. I think people want to see more space to both ensure a win and also to ensure a big enough win to give him more legitimacy to work with in his second term.
3) Also, the issue is coat tails for congress, the House in specific. HOPEFULLY, the senate races remain compartmentalized like they have been and the initial assessment of the senate very likely flipping R will end up with a net gain of a seat or two for the ds. The House has always been a long shot, but the more they can chip into it the less capacity for those clowns to muck things up over the next few years.
RedSpartan
(1,693 posts)I agree, but remember that 20% of the votes in Ohio have already been cast and Obama leads those by a wide margin. Even if the polls tighten in general, he has a lot of padding. Romney basically has to win the remaining 80% by a 56%+ margin, and no poll has ever shown him anywhere in that universe.
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)until the votes are actually counted -- and unless they are counted accurately.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)wt1531
(424 posts)Any funny business regarding voting will not be tolerated.
Amphigouri
(38 posts)The facts don't work well in our favor. People better get out and vote, or we lose Ohio.
CNN today: Four years ago, Democrats made up about 42 percent of the early and absentee vote while Republicans made up 22 percent. Through Wednesday, however, the margin has narrowed: Democrats account for 36 percent of the early and absentee vote while Republicans make up for 29 percent.
That is a 13 point swing for repugs. It's far from a lost cause, but if we think Ohio is a slam dunk,we're deluding ourselves. The biggest thing I fear is a perception that some of these states are foregone conclusions.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)He is winning big among those who already voted in all 4 recent polls.
So if democrats make less than republicans in proportion to 2008, that's even better.
Although I have no clue how they would know that, since in OH voters do not register by party.
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)TroyD
(4,551 posts)As they say, "It's not who votes, it's who counts the votes."
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)University researchers have examined the machines and found out that they can miscount votes without leaving any trace.
Kteachums
(331 posts)If this state takes a turn around something illegal is happening. I know how much folks there love him. He has rescued their jobs for now and the future. Way to go Ohio! Get out and vote for our President!
GetTheRightVote
(5,287 posts)will be happy when this election is over with Pres. Obama re-elected and in the WH,