Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:13 PM Apr 2016

World's Second Largest Investor, Vanguard, Is Socialist

I’ve been watching Bernie Sanders describe himself as a democratic socialist these months and wanting to shout at him that that isn’t quite what he means. Over here in Europe, given that we live rather closer to properly socialist states and also came rather closer to it ourselves we’re perhaps a bit more attuned to the niceties of the nomenclature here. “Democratic socialism” was the way that the Trotskyites described themselves. The inner core of the party would vote on things, that’s the democracy, and then everyone else would have to do what they said or get shot which isn’t quite socialism but is what they meant. What Bernie actually means is what we over here call social democracy, some variant of which exists in just about all of the Western European countries. A largely capitalist and market based economy but with a higher tax rate than the U.S., the revenues from which are used to buy nice things for the voters. Free college education, free child care, free family leave and so on. Of course, none of these things are free; they’re just tax financed.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/02/10/memo-for-bernie-worlds-second-largest-investor-vanguard-is-socialist/#2b62a8a62ccb

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Cal Carpenter

(4,959 posts)
2. Uh, no
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:22 PM
Apr 2016

By definition, it is not. I wouldn't recommend Forbes as a source on anything that is actually socialist.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
4. No, by *definition* it is. All mutual funds are. That's the "mutual" part of it.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:28 PM
Apr 2016

The shareholders own the company itself. Credit unions are also socialist, as are co-ops and employee-owned companies.

Cal Carpenter

(4,959 posts)
8. No, a mututal fund *is* capital
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:39 PM
Apr 2016

If it were socialist, the *workers* would 'own' the companies the mutual fund is trading, not the shareholders. The shareholders are profiting because of worker exploitation. This is the basically opposite of socialism.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
9. Which would make Goldman-Sachs the largest socialist organization in the world
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:41 PM
Apr 2016

Since only its traders own its trading capital...

Cal Carpenter

(4,959 posts)
10. I think you missed my point
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:44 PM
Apr 2016

Or maybe you're just fucking with me.

But either way, I don't really think I want to talk about economic theory in GDP on a Saturday night anymore.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
6. And the blogger's point that "socialist" doesn't mean "non-market" is a good one
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:29 PM
Apr 2016

and something that a lot of Team Sanders doesn't really seem to get.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
7. I and most other understand the term "socialist". I doubt you'll find many if any that
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:30 PM
Apr 2016

think Bernie wants to nationalize all industry in the US.

TheBlackAdder

(28,224 posts)
5. Just like the MIC, Defense Contractors, Oil Companies, Big PhRMA, etc. Everyone is plugged in.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:28 PM
Apr 2016

.


I love the Tea Party ilitary guys down my street who try to explain away their socialist job, their socialist pension at age 42, their property tax credit, and especially their secondary defense contractor jobs paying six-figures... all while they tap into the exchanges and subsudized commissary. Capitalism is just an illusion.


The problem is that those in power wrote the tax rules to benefit them. Small Business, Xe making over $30Billion is a small business, so is Koch Industries, so it multi-national KPMG, etc. They just need less than 100 owners. So when you hear about protecting 'small business' that's not who they are talking about, they want you to think about the mom&pop store, but really there are multiple tiers to the tax code that most small business can't take advantage of.

.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
13. The notion that one of the biggest institutional investors of capital is socialist is ludicrous.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:09 AM
Apr 2016

and yes, having studied the Danon lawsuit I know better than most about its inverted corporate structure.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
14. The op linked to legalinsurrection last night, a vile racist right wing website:
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:16 AM
Apr 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1629077

They are scouring the internet looking for hit pieces and don't care what they drag back here.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»World's Second Largest In...