Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
20. let me see ... sniper fire in Bosnia, speeches to goldman
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:54 PM
Apr 2016

sachs so bad she refuses to release them, tax mess at the old foundation, her child healthcare lies, all the shit she claims she did that she didn't do ... I could go on forever.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
5. I just don't expect much from Sanders anymore except negativity and fibs.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 10:32 AM
Apr 2016

He is no angel or saint like some people like to make him out to be.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
7. Clinton and supporters were saying same things about Obama in 2008
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 10:38 AM
Apr 2016

A new playbook might be helpful if the Clinton campaign wants to contest Sanders.

In this case it also shows phony anger.

Response to Armstead (Reply #7)

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
18. I know....But cheap shots still require a response (sometimes)
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 12:29 PM
Apr 2016

Won't make a difference to the poster, but makes one feel better to respond.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
6. I'm sure once Hillary starts apologizing, he'll get right on whatever fake outrage of the day
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 10:33 AM
Apr 2016

you're talking about...

polly7

(20,582 posts)
9. Has she apologized for pushing the destruction of a sovereign nation that resulted
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 10:40 AM
Apr 2016

in so much suffering and horror for now millions of people?

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
10. Apologise for what? Telling the truth?
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 10:41 AM
Apr 2016
http://m.dailykos.com/stories/1508079

You see, someone actually went and checked the easily found facts, instead of not bothering and calling it "murky".

There's nothing murky at all if you go to the Senate website, look up the donations and lobbyists in question. All the details of which groups they lobby for and the amounts of money they gathered from which industry are explicitly provided. It's pretty easy to determine the amounts, which Greenpeace did, and which the Washington Post decided not to bother to do.

But don't worry, I'm sure the Washington Post will have another 16 or so hit pieces following shortly to try and deflect from their usual "incompetence".

Response to itsrobert (Original post)

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
14. Has Clinton apologized to Eva Resnick-Day for viciously going off on her when she
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 12:16 PM
Apr 2016

simply asked a respectful question that Bernie and O'Malley were decent enough to respond to? Hilly was not happy at all was she? A terrible temperament for anyone to have.




She doesn't seem to be that nice, even to her errant husband who worked so hard on her last failed campaign and now this one when it's obvious his heath isn't the best. She only seems to respect those in power, maybe because they can do more for her. Who knows. But it certainly isn't a nice trait.



Response to itsrobert (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Has Three Pinocchios apol...