2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAurora victim's stepfather blasts Sanders over gun views
A federal judge threw out his lawsuit against Lucky Gunner, and now the Phillips family must pay its legal fees under Colorado law.
As the Democratic primary race turns to New York, where the gun issue looms large, Clinton will seize upon their story and those like it. The Phillips daughter, Jessica Ghawi, died in the 2012 mass shooting at a movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colo.
(snip)
I dont think he had any idea of the repercussions this law would cause, Phillips said of Sanders. I would like Bernie Sanders to at least apologize to us for the heartache this has caused.
http://www.9news.com/news/nation-now/aurora-victims-stepfather-blasts-sanders-over-gun-views/123980276
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)And now blames who? Sanders? For going in for a quick bunch of money and losing and having to pay the winners?
That's just bad judgement, bad legal counsel.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)...
Attorneys at Arnold and Porter and the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence brought the lawsuit for us, pro bono. We knew the risks of bringing the case. We knew that Colorado and Congress have given special protection of the gun industry, and we knew that under Colorado law we could even be ordered to pay attorneys fees because of those special protections.
But we thought it was important to take a stand, to fight to prevent other families from suffering as we have. We did not seek any money in our case. We just wanted injunctive relief to have these companies act reasonably when they sold dangerous materiel, like 100-round ammunition magazines, ammunition, body armor, and tear gas.
...
The judge dismissed our case because, he said, these online sellers had special immunity from the general duty to use reasonable care under the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act and a Colorado immunity law. If you couple the PLCAA law with Colorados law HB 000-208, (which says in essence: If you bring a civil case against a gun or ammunition seller and the case is dismissed then the plaintiff must pay all the defendants costs)
I do not understand why the Brady Center is not footing the bill...they really fucked over those poor people.
Press Virginia
(2,329 posts)maybe he should take a hint
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Hillary should stop using these people as props.
mythology
(9,527 posts)It's immoral as a law to protect gun manufacturers from taking responsibility for refusing to add safety features.
Press Virginia
(2,329 posts)either the aurora or sandy hook murders
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)They are challenged
Press Virginia
(2,329 posts)by the guy who bought the gun but I thought someone who, repeatedly, demanded additional safety features might have something
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Parroting Hillary's talking points doesn't change the facts.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)is mutual abuse from both sides.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)If you want to get rid of guns pass legislation to ban them, trying to bankrupt manufacturers and dealers who don't violate the law and aren't responsible for the actions of criminals isn't the way to go.
Dragging these families back out into the limelight to stump for a politician is despicable.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)SLAAP suits by firearms opponents caused the law to be passed, huge mistake by them.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)IMHO the victims, who sue, are using HRC as
much for their purpose as she uses them,
in other words: attack Bernie!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I agree, anyone who has done research on the issue knows it's not Bernie's fault. Instead of going after the actual NRA shills Hillary supporters are attacking Bernie who's always been in their corner when it comes to gun control.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)It's not Bernie's fault. Sue state legislators for being careless with gun laws.
Seeinghope
(786 posts)It is all about the law. If the law isn't broken then there isn't a case. The issue on guns is an issue that will take a change in the legal system in order for any lawsuit to be successful. Until that time it is a waste of money to go to court when the laws are stacked against you. Time is better spent on trying to change the laws and taking on Goliath....the NRA and other Gun lobbyists.
artislife
(9,497 posts)snowy owl
(2,145 posts)I would expect a lot of you because that is certainly better than suin Mom and Pop hunting shops where hunting is legal. If you want to change things, you should thank Bernie for trying to get assault weapons made illegal. You people are so blinded by Hillary. You shoud be ashamed. Why do you spread incorrect information? If you don't know better, then inform yourselves.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Provided the lawyers. They were former Brady group members. They admitted on Rachel Maddow's show they were told they would lose and went ahead with the lawsuit for political purposes. They lost the suit under Colorado law, not the federal law in fact.
JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I am sure the Brady group could pay off the losses they caused that family with the frivolous lawsuit.