Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

El Supremo

(20,365 posts)
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:30 PM Apr 2016

Aurora victim's stepfather blasts Sanders over gun views

Lonnie Phillips is filing for bankruptcy because he owes $203,000 to the company that sold his stepdaughter’s killer 4,000 rounds of ammunition over the Internet.

A federal judge threw out his lawsuit against Lucky Gunner, and now the Phillips family must pay its legal fees under Colorado law.

As the Democratic primary race turns to New York, where the gun issue looms large, Clinton will seize upon their story and those like it. The Phillips’ daughter, Jessica Ghawi, died in the 2012 mass shooting at a movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colo.

(snip)

“I don’t think he had any idea of the repercussions this law would cause,” Phillips said of Sanders. “I would like Bernie Sanders to at least apologize to us for the heartache this has caused.”

http://www.9news.com/news/nation-now/aurora-victims-stepfather-blasts-sanders-over-gun-views/123980276
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Aurora victim's stepfather blasts Sanders over gun views (Original Post) El Supremo Apr 2016 OP
But Hillary made him do it. Jitter65 Apr 2016 #1
Bad legal advice. Loser pays defense costs, did he not know this? CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #19
Very bad legal advice from the Brady Group. Poor guy knew better but went ahead anyway jmg257 Apr 2016 #2
Bernie's view is oddly similar to the judge who tossed the lawsuit Press Virginia Apr 2016 #3
Colorado law is responsible for his owing the money. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #4
And Sanders should listen to them mythology Apr 2016 #6
Safety features like what? Name a single safety feature that would have prevented Press Virginia Apr 2016 #7
Love the sound of crickets when Duckhunter935 Apr 2016 #15
Well I didn't expect a long list of features that would prevent murder Press Virginia Apr 2016 #20
That's not what the lawsuit was about, it was frivolous and he knew he would lose. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #8
Love you bmus, but I think this sadoldgirl Apr 2016 #11
I don't have a problem with his vote for the PLCAA. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #13
So true Duckhunter935 Apr 2016 #16
Sorry, if you mis understood me. sadoldgirl Apr 2016 #21
Ah, gotcha! beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #22
They sued the wrong people Politicalboi Apr 2016 #5
Exactly! Seeinghope Apr 2016 #9
That is it in a nutshell. nt artislife Apr 2016 #14
So how many of you have sued car manufacturers when you get into accidents? Or the salesman? snowy owl Apr 2016 #10
The Brady group Duckhunter935 Apr 2016 #12
Should they be suing their lawyers for the legal equivalent of malpractice JonathanRackham Apr 2016 #17
Agreed Duckhunter935 Apr 2016 #18
 

CentralCoaster

(1,163 posts)
19. Bad legal advice. Loser pays defense costs, did he not know this?
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 10:11 PM
Apr 2016

And now blames who? Sanders? For going in for a quick bunch of money and losing and having to pay the winners?

That's just bad judgement, bad legal counsel.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
2. Very bad legal advice from the Brady Group. Poor guy knew better but went ahead anyway
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:34 PM
Apr 2016
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lonnie-and-sandy-phillips/lucky-gunner-lawsuit_b_8197804.html
...
Attorneys at Arnold and Porter and the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence brought the lawsuit for us, pro bono. We knew the risks of bringing the case. We knew that Colorado and Congress have given special protection of the gun industry, and we knew that under Colorado law we could even be ordered to pay attorneys’ fees because of those special protections.

But we thought it was important to take a stand, to fight to prevent other families from suffering as we have. We did not seek any money in our case. We just wanted injunctive relief — to have these companies act reasonably when they sold dangerous materiel, like 100-round ammunition magazines, ammunition, body armor, and tear gas.
...
The judge dismissed our case because, he said, these online sellers had special immunity from the general duty to use reasonable care under the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act and a Colorado immunity law. If you couple the PLCAA law with Colorado’s law HB 000-208, (which says in essence: If you bring a civil case against a gun or ammunition seller and the case is dismissed then the plaintiff must pay all the defendant’s costs)



I do not understand why the Brady Center is not footing the bill...they really fucked over those poor people.
 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
6. And Sanders should listen to them
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:41 PM
Apr 2016

It's immoral as a law to protect gun manufacturers from taking responsibility for refusing to add safety features.

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
7. Safety features like what? Name a single safety feature that would have prevented
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:49 PM
Apr 2016

either the aurora or sandy hook murders

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
20. Well I didn't expect a long list of features that would prevent murder
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 10:12 PM
Apr 2016

by the guy who bought the gun but I thought someone who, repeatedly, demanded additional safety features might have something

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
8. That's not what the lawsuit was about, it was frivolous and he knew he would lose.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:51 PM
Apr 2016

Parroting Hillary's talking points doesn't change the facts.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
13. I don't have a problem with his vote for the PLCAA.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 10:06 PM
Apr 2016

If you want to get rid of guns pass legislation to ban them, trying to bankrupt manufacturers and dealers who don't violate the law and aren't responsible for the actions of criminals isn't the way to go.

Dragging these families back out into the limelight to stump for a politician is despicable.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
21. Sorry, if you mis understood me.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 10:16 PM
Apr 2016

IMHO the victims, who sue, are using HRC as
much for their purpose as she uses them,
in other words: attack Bernie!

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
22. Ah, gotcha!
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 10:20 PM
Apr 2016

I agree, anyone who has done research on the issue knows it's not Bernie's fault. Instead of going after the actual NRA shills Hillary supporters are attacking Bernie who's always been in their corner when it comes to gun control.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
5. They sued the wrong people
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:37 PM
Apr 2016

It's not Bernie's fault. Sue state legislators for being careless with gun laws.

 

Seeinghope

(786 posts)
9. Exactly!
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:57 PM
Apr 2016

It is all about the law. If the law isn't broken then there isn't a case. The issue on guns is an issue that will take a change in the legal system in order for any lawsuit to be successful. Until that time it is a waste of money to go to court when the laws are stacked against you. Time is better spent on trying to change the laws and taking on Goliath....the NRA and other Gun lobbyists.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
10. So how many of you have sued car manufacturers when you get into accidents? Or the salesman?
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 10:01 PM
Apr 2016

I would expect a lot of you because that is certainly better than suin Mom and Pop hunting shops where hunting is legal. If you want to change things, you should thank Bernie for trying to get assault weapons made illegal. You people are so blinded by Hillary. You shoud be ashamed. Why do you spread incorrect information? If you don't know better, then inform yourselves.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
12. The Brady group
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 10:05 PM
Apr 2016

Provided the lawyers. They were former Brady group members. They admitted on Rachel Maddow's show they were told they would lose and went ahead with the lawsuit for political purposes. They lost the suit under Colorado law, not the federal law in fact.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
18. Agreed
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 10:10 PM
Apr 2016

I am sure the Brady group could pay off the losses they caused that family with the frivolous lawsuit.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Aurora victim's stepfathe...