Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
76 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie invited himself to the Vatican... (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Apr 2016 OP
A Trump like move. nt onehandle Apr 2016 #1
It figures eh? workinclasszero Apr 2016 #12
**sigh** Loudestlib Apr 2016 #76
lying is a mortal sin. the vatican debunked this lie. Check the greatest list roguevalley Apr 2016 #21
How embarrassing that some keep trying to spread it. lostnfound Apr 2016 #56
Claims the Third Wayer Margaret Archer... nt GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #2
No he didn't. I do enjoy the full run by so many to act so stupid. morningfog Apr 2016 #3
Sorry but I saw Bernie on Morning Joe this a.m. and he stated that he had an invitation from the politicaljunkie41910 Apr 2016 #50
I accept your apology. morningfog Apr 2016 #52
I didn't apologize. I see you interpret as well as you spell. politicaljunkie41910 Apr 2016 #55
Look out, we gotta tough guy! morningfog Apr 2016 #59
READING COMPREHENSION IS NOT YOUR FRIEND EITHER again angrychair Apr 2016 #63
Some much for the "Bernie got invited, but Hillary didn't" meme KingFlorez Apr 2016 #4
Catch up. He was invited - to a conference. The OP assertion has been debunked. JudyM Apr 2016 #51
Can we all invite ourselves to speak? I'm going to invite myself too. Yay. So easy to get an invite! Nanjeanne Apr 2016 #5
Sweet! Cali_Democrat Apr 2016 #10
He must be all-powerful, because they accepted (and the smear job was debunked). nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #6
No--here is the release by the Vatican. But nice try... panader0 Apr 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author immoderate Apr 2016 #8
And the second statement the Vatican Iliyah Apr 2016 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Vilis Veritas Apr 2016 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Vilis Veritas Apr 2016 #11
Hill Shills are in full meltdown! wiltom99 Apr 2016 #13
New York is about 65% Catholic so it's much worse than you think. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #28
In 1960, although Catholic JFK won New York in the Presidential election, he won with only 52%... George II Apr 2016 #62
riiiiiiiiight, cuz that's all it takes, right? TheSarcastinator Apr 2016 #14
Ugh! The new completely ignorant meme of the day! TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #15
Debunked, yet you leave it here. Why don't you self-delete before some cynical person concludes ... Scuba Apr 2016 #16
I've taken your request into consideration and I will respectfully have to decline that request. Cali_Democrat Apr 2016 #18
PRIDEFUL IGNORANCE AND SHIT STIRRING! morningfog Apr 2016 #20
Perfect example of the dearth of credibility that exists in camp Hillary. NorthCarolina Apr 2016 #25
Yep, just makes Team Hillary look even worse. They're trying SO hard to lose this election! seattleite Apr 2016 #35
Since the Vatican itself nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #38
I'm curious... HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #48
I hate propaganda, and in this case it is at PRAVDA level nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #49
Much more than I actually asked about but ok... HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #53
And there is the talking point that you guys are testing nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #54
Well agree to disagree HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #57
Alas he was recommended by one of the top economists in the world nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #61
Talking Points? HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #65
The office of the pope moved quickly to distance the pontiff from Sanders’s visit. Father Federico Cha Apr 2016 #19
"Papal official denies report Sanders invited himself to Vatican" beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #44
Demagogue. Sincere apology is required here. kgnu_fan Apr 2016 #22
How many times today has this Bloomberg Financial article been debunked? B Calm Apr 2016 #23
If all you have to do is ask for an invitation why didn't Hillary ask? DebDoo Apr 2016 #24
I'm not sure the OP title is completely correct CorkySt.Clair Apr 2016 #26
FALSE Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #27
Aww... yet another smear campaign shot down in it's infancy. Marr Apr 2016 #29
Kicking. i want more people to see the lies you spread! JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #30
You post a lot of untruthful things. Look into that. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2016 #31
Liar liar pants on fire jfern Apr 2016 #32
If i put something blatantly false and debunked up SheenaR Apr 2016 #33
Why do people feel compelled to lie about something. The Vatican provided proof they did dr60omg Apr 2016 #34
They are addicted to self-embarrassment melman Apr 2016 #37
They hate Bernie so much they leave lies with pride. morningfog Apr 2016 #40
Now debunked. rachacha Apr 2016 #36
Friction between Sorondo and Archer? SMC22307 Apr 2016 #43
I frankly don't care about this non-issue. Beacool Apr 2016 #75
K&R for the lulz.. Fumesucker Apr 2016 #39
Any comment on Bill Clinton's racist rant? morningfog Apr 2016 #41
Better luck tomorrow. frylock Apr 2016 #42
Or not. Swing and a miss... jmg257 Apr 2016 #45
Clinton campaign scuzziness backfires. tabasco Apr 2016 #46
Nice try BlindTiresias Apr 2016 #47
Did a birdie tell him that this was a good idea? DesertRat Apr 2016 #60
The op? Well someone must have told him to do it, and he still won't delete: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #64
Ask him .... TheFarS1de Apr 2016 #66
I wouldn't recommend campaign advice from an animal DesertRat Apr 2016 #70
Your the one talking about getting advice from animals TheFarS1de Apr 2016 #72
Has a birdie told you this has been debunked? azurnoir Apr 2016 #67
By good idea, I mean why go at all. DesertRat Apr 2016 #69
And he won't be kissing the Pope's ring.... Historic NY Apr 2016 #68
You know, even though this thread is bs I was thinking even if it were true I would Nanjeanne Apr 2016 #71
+1 B Calm Apr 2016 #73
Well, you know, the Pope advocates on behalf of those that Hillary folks believe NorthCarolina Apr 2016 #74

lostnfound

(16,187 posts)
56. How embarrassing that some keep trying to spread it.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:30 PM
Apr 2016

And embarrassing that it bugs them so much that Bernie was invited.

Embarrassing that they don't understand why a Vatican that has expressed repeated concern that a poverty-producing global economic order was stripping human beings of their dignity might find alignment with a man who has made that one of the central issues of his campaign and his entire career.

It must be terrible to have to ignore the truth so much. To have to be opposed to people who are interested in economic and social justice. It must be sad.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
3. No he didn't. I do enjoy the full run by so many to act so stupid.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 01:14 PM
Apr 2016

He requested and invitation, they then extended an invitation to him.

YOu can't invite yourself. This is asinine and you all lack any critical independent thought.

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
50. Sorry but I saw Bernie on Morning Joe this a.m. and he stated that he had an invitation from the
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:50 PM
Apr 2016

Vatican, which translates to "the Pope", when in fact he had received an invitation from the local guy in NY who had not even run it by the head of the Academy who is sponsoring the conference. Bernie either didn't know to what he was being invited and who was inviting him, or he was being dishonest. Either way, it doesn't reflect well on the man who claims to be the gatekeeper of all that is pure and honest. Now he has put the Vatican in a poor posture, because he has injected politics into the situation.

"...But the office of the pope moved quickly to distance the pontiff from the visit. Father Federico Lombardi, the Pope’s spokesman, said Sanders had been invited “not by the pope but by the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.” Lombardi told the Italian news agency Ansa: “For the moment there is no expectation that there will also be a meeting with the pope.” ...

Now if Bernie was so interested in the Conference and not in scoring political points, I would suggest that he attend the 4-day conference (for all four days) which runs directly in the days preceeding the NY primary, knowing that he will not be meeting with the pope, and that he will be missing out on perhaps the debate and all those rally's he has scheduled prior to the NY Primary. If he then chooses to pass on the trip to the conference, we'll know what his intentions were.

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
55. I didn't apologize. I see you interpret as well as you spell.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:22 PM
Apr 2016

If you play your condescending attitude with me, expect that I will reciprocate. As I said, I saw Bernie's interview this morning and he made if perfectly clear that he had received an invitation from the Vatican based on the ideas he was espousing as part of his presidential campaign. The Vatican's response says otherwise. It appears the armor of honesty and trustworthiness is starting to chip off of Mr. Sanders.

angrychair

(8,722 posts)
63. READING COMPREHENSION IS NOT YOUR FRIEND EITHER again
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 07:41 PM
Apr 2016

I deny that. It was not that way," Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo told Reuters in a telephone interview while he was traveling in New York. Sorondo, a close aide to Pope Francis, is chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, which is hosting the event. He said it was his idea to invite Sanders.

A Bloomberg report quoted Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, as saying that Sanders had broken with protocol by failing to contact her office first.
"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/senior-papal-official-untrue-sanders-invited-himself-vatican-173414032.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw

Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

Response to Iliyah (Reply #9)

Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

 

wiltom99

(27 posts)
13. Hill Shills are in full meltdown!
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 01:28 PM
Apr 2016

They know this will sew up NY for Bernie, his home state. They know that since NY is 1/3 catholic, Hillary will lose and lose big. Their corrupt candidate is sinking fast! She needs to drop out now and endorse Bernie.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
28. New York is about 65% Catholic so it's much worse than you think.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 04:42 PM
Apr 2016

I had no idea myself. I googled that. Funny how they reacted to that news.

George II

(67,782 posts)
62. In 1960, although Catholic JFK won New York in the Presidential election, he won with only 52%...
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 07:37 PM
Apr 2016

....I don't see how Sanders' pleading with the Pope to see him winning New York.

Sander's "home state"? He turned his back on New York 50 years ago, Clinton is more of a New Yorker than Sanders is.

By the way, before I forget....welcome back!

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
14. riiiiiiiiight, cuz that's all it takes, right?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 01:29 PM
Apr 2016

I mean, inviting yourself to the Vatican is easy, right? How Hillary-ously ridiculous can you be?

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
16. Debunked, yet you leave it here. Why don't you self-delete before some cynical person concludes ...
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 01:39 PM
Apr 2016

... that you're being dishonest?

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
18. I've taken your request into consideration and I will respectfully have to decline that request.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 01:54 PM
Apr 2016

Please feel free to appeal my decision if you would like.

If you need more information on the appeals process, just let me know.

Thanks.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
25. Perfect example of the dearth of credibility that exists in camp Hillary.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 04:24 PM
Apr 2016

I for one would rather see it stand for all to see as a testament to that exact fact. In fact, I may come back and kick it a few times.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
38. Since the Vatican itself
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 04:56 PM
Apr 2016

debunked this, you are just adding to your credibility.

lemme see who do I trust on this? THE VATICAN, or CALI-DEMOCRAT?

That is one hard question to answer, isn't it? Please proceed with this...

(And I will have to add this since I know some will miss it)

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
48. I'm curious...
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:40 PM
Apr 2016

In this post are you Nadin, the impartial journalist or Nadin the snarky Sanders supporter?

It's hard to tell sometimes.


Right back atcha.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
49. I hate propaganda, and in this case it is at PRAVDA level
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:49 PM
Apr 2016

More like Minitrue... and when I write for the paper I walk a line round the center.

By the way, I am actually working on a story on the Panama Papers... and how they are related to why my neighbors cannot afford basic shit like oh housing. Yes, the Obama, Bush and Clinton Administrations have made this easier though TPAs, and there is real outrage. Not that CNN will bother telling you this. I also do not expect most of our politicians to give a rats ass about that. But the pitchforks are going to come.

There is more, this idiocy is to remove a discussion of this from your screens.



For the record, stories of this are spanning the political media from oh NewsMax (I came across the link two seconds ago) to CNN... sorry cupcake. And to quote Bill, the only thing he had right on that, was... "tell the truth."

I would prefer BOTH to spend a lot more quality time on POLICY, like poverty, income inequality and state corruption.

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
53. Much more than I actually asked about but ok...
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:08 PM
Apr 2016

On just the Vatican story, putting on your impartial Journalist hat, the story unfolds publically something like this:

Bernie spox on Morning Java crows about the invite. Political back and forth ensues.

The woman who is running the conference, who is based in Rome responds with no that's not how it went down, first, he asked to be invited, and second, for him to not contact her first was a slight and not protocol.

Then, a Monsignor who's in NY and is her superior says no no, I invited him, and she knew all about it. What she forgot?

And now she's no longer speaking about it.

This passes the smell test? The Vatican inserts itself in an American election? Really....

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
54. And there is the talking point that you guys are testing
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:19 PM
Apr 2016

nice...

I think the list of people invited and the reasoning behind it is closer to the truth.

We wanted a person from North America. They could have invited PM Trudeau... I suspect none wants to give any air time to President Pena Nieto (plus he is a neoliberal) the full list they released had not a one of them. And Lopez Obrador is an embarrassment at this point. You might want to look at the list.

So yes I am taking the Vatican's POV here. I also do not expect this to play that much of a role with American Catholics who are next to vote, The part of the story you missed. Though in the optics department, he being in the Vatican discussing income inequality will be a hell of a contrast with HRC at a nice swank fundraiser.

And anyway, how many posts from the ACTUAL VATICAN INVITATION need to be posted for the OP to finally remove the false narrative...

For the record, I don't expect her to, and I know Bloomberg News did an oopsie. They happen.

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
57. Well agree to disagree
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:34 PM
Apr 2016

Of all the leaders and thinkers in North America, they picked a guy in the middle of a contentious primary race.

To believe that is to believe that the Vatican was clueless as to the perception of the invitation as a gesture of an endorsement. Or one has to believe that the Vatican all of the sudden is getting involved in Amercian Elections. One cannot broadly discount either of those two scenarios.

And I cannot simply toss away the initial reaction from the very woman who is running the gathering. She was clear and adamant. And now she's not speaking.

I think you are choosing to believe the narrative that favors your candidate.

Which I imagine you reject, so agree to disagree.

Peace.


 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
58. Alas he was recommended by one of the top economists in the world
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:39 PM
Apr 2016

who happens to be an American... so there is that. Oh and by the way that economist is talking at the conference.

What I got to wonder is what level of coordination exists between the actual campaign and posters here. The talking points are amazingly the same.

Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #58)

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
65. Talking Points?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 07:48 PM
Apr 2016

Yeah, no , I'm a furniture maker from NY not paid by anyone other than my customers...

If the talking points read similarly maybe it's because these alleged talking points are obvious truths that anyone can come up with on their own.

Or you could believe that anyone who questions his campaign is coordinating somehow with hers.

Not the case here.

But let me ask you this, getting away from the smell test of it all: why is he going to sit and listen to this event, half way round the world in the middle of the New York primary? He's not speaking, just listening....he's not, so far, having an audience with the Pope. What's the point except for it to appear statesman-like? The timing of it seems ill-advised - its an exhausting journey and he already looks tired; it will cost the campaign a bundle (does the campaign pay for the trip or is this his own out of pocket? That's just a curiosity, doesn't matter to me either way.)

And why did he go on the View and say yes, he's meeting with the Pope? It's too easy to disprove, what could possibly have been his motive to mislead, other than something political.

Primaries are political and he just seems clunky lately -

Cha

(297,395 posts)
19. The office of the pope moved quickly to distance the pontiff from Sanders’s visit. Father Federico
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 02:28 PM
Apr 2016
Lombardi, the Pope’s spokesman, said Sanders had been invited “not by the pope but by the pontifical academy of social sciences.” Lombardi told the Italian news agency Ansa: “For the moment there is no expectation that there will also be a meeting with the pope.”

Thank you, Cali~

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
44. "Papal official denies report Sanders invited himself to Vatican"
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:20 PM
Apr 2016
Papal official denies report Sanders invited himself to Vatican

VATICAN CITY/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders was invited to speak at an April 15 Vatican event by the Vatican, a senior papal official said on Friday, denying a report that Sanders had invited himself.

"I deny that. It was not that way," Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo told Reuters in a telephone interview while he was traveling in New York. Sorondo, a close aide to Pope Francis, is chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, which is hosting the event.

He said it was his idea to invite Sanders.

A Bloomberg report quoted Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, as saying that Sanders had broken with protocol by failing to contact her office first.

"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/senior-papal-official-untrue-sanders-invited-himself-vatican-173414032.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw




I hope that crow is nice and tender.


 

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)
26. I'm not sure the OP title is completely correct
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 04:26 PM
Apr 2016

But it's clear that Bernie was FOS when he said he was invited by the Vatican on Morning Joe. That's not what happened at all, though I won't go so far as to say he invited himself.

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
33. If i put something blatantly false and debunked up
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 04:44 PM
Apr 2016

I'd have the integrity to take it down.

Several here disagree

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
43. Friction between Sorondo and Archer?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:18 PM
Apr 2016
"I deny that. It was not that way," Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo told Reuters in a telephone interview while he was traveling in New York. Sorondo, a close aide to Pope Francis, is chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, which is hosting the event.

He said it was his idea to invite Sanders.

A Bloomberg report quoted Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, as saying that Sanders had broken with protocol by failing to contact her office first.

"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.

An invitation to Sanders dated March 30, which was emailed to Reuters, was signed by Sorondo and also included Archer's name.


Damn, I've been working out in the yard most of the day... seems I've missed quite a kerfuffle!

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
75. I frankly don't care about this non-issue.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 08:33 PM
Apr 2016

But, the argument is between the chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences (Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo) and its president (Margaret Archer). She's the one who didn't seem amused by the invitation. No one was any the wiser until she made her opinion known to Bloomberg.





Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
39. K&R for the lulz..
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 04:57 PM
Apr 2016

No one appreciates good satire any more, hell you can't even recognize it without a road map GPS.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
41. Any comment on Bill Clinton's racist rant?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:01 PM
Apr 2016

Or is your concern limited to race baiting Bernie supporters?

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
46. Clinton campaign scuzziness backfires.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:34 PM
Apr 2016

What an awful campaign Clinton is running!

Terribly bad judgment by Clinton to hire sleazebag Brock.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
64. The op? Well someone must have told him to do it, and he still won't delete:
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 07:41 PM
Apr 2016
Papal official denies report Sanders invited himself to Vatican

VATICAN CITY/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders was invited to speak at an April 15 Vatican event by the Vatican, a senior papal official said on Friday, denying a report that Sanders had invited himself.

"I deny that. It was not that way," Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo told Reuters in a telephone interview while he was traveling in New York. Sorondo, a close aide to Pope Francis, is chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, which is hosting the event.

He said it was his idea to invite Sanders.

A Bloomberg report quoted Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, as saying that Sanders had broken with protocol by failing to contact her office first.

"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/senior-papal-official-untrue-sanders-invited-himself-vatican-173414032.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw



TheFarS1de

(1,017 posts)
66. Ask him ....
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 07:53 PM
Apr 2016


A lot of people hate a little bird ... sad . But if you get no answer from the bird ask this guy ....



If your after advice from an animal , worth a shot .

TheFarS1de

(1,017 posts)
72. Your the one talking about getting advice from animals
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 08:22 PM
Apr 2016

I merely pointed out the stupidity of the assertion . Left the spelling mistake as that is the least of what needs correction on these forums .

DesertRat

(27,995 posts)
69. By good idea, I mean why go at all.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 08:17 PM
Apr 2016

He's attending an academic conference in Europe, days before the NY Primary. He's not scheduled to be a speaker and Pope Francis isn't scheduled to be there.

Nanjeanne

(4,967 posts)
71. You know, even though this thread is bs I was thinking even if it were true I would
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 08:19 PM
Apr 2016

Still be thrilled. How wonderful that my candidate would be someone who thought that this symposium was important enough to be at it. To interact with thinkers on topics as important as what will be discussed there.

How much better that Bernie Sanders wants to discuss these kinds of issues rather than speaking to a room of Wall Street elite for a humongous fee.

Good for you Senator Sanders.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
74. Well, you know, the Pope advocates on behalf of those that Hillary folks believe
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 08:28 PM
Apr 2016

are just freeloaders looking for free stuff and handouts. Poor, schmoore, get a job deadbeat then maybe you can go to College and afford healthcare. The compassionate bootstrap theory.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie invited himself to...