Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 03:45 PM Apr 2016

Politifact: Fact-checking Bill Clinton’s Philly defense of his controversial crime bill



http://www.politifact.com/pennsylvania/statements/2016/apr/08/bill-clinton/fact-checking-bill-clintons-philly-defense-his-con/

Our ruling

In a heated exchange with protesters in Philadelphia, Bill Clinton defended his 1994 crime bill saying "because of that bill, we had a 25-year low in crime, a 33-year low in the murder rate, and listen to this, because of that and the background check law, a 46-year low in the deaths of people of gun violence."

Experts and studies haven’t reached consensus on what caused the historic drops in crime. But they do roundly agree that it can’t all be attributed to Clinton’s 1994 crime bill. In fact, most suggest the crime bill’s role in the drop was negligible. We rule the claim Mostly False.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politifact: Fact-checking Bill Clinton’s Philly defense of his controversial crime bill (Original Post) GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 OP
I do wonder what it is due to...because the statistics are quite remarkable. Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #1
Most of the crime drop was because of the ban on leaded gas jfern Apr 2016 #3
Mostly false, and mostly having a serious race problem jfern Apr 2016 #2
HuffPo also calls Bill completely wrong peacebird Apr 2016 #4
That's good. Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #5

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
4. HuffPo also calls Bill completely wrong
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 03:58 PM
Apr 2016
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bill-clinton-welfare-reform_us_5707cbf4e4b0c4e26a227a34

Here’s what he told protesters at a campaign rally for Hillary Clinton in Philadelphia:

“They say the welfare reform bill increased poverty. Then why did we have the largest drop in African American poverty in history when I was president? The largest in history. What happened was, all these Republicans got into — the Supreme Court elected President Bush 5 to 4, then all these Republicans took over state legislatures. We left ‘em with enough money to take care of all the poor people who couldn’t go to work on welfare. We left ‘em with the money they had before the welfare rolls went down 60 percent. The Republicans took it away, and [these protesters are] blaming me.”
This is not true. Poverty dropped during the Clinton years not because of welfare reform, but because the entire American economy was being juiced by a massive stock market bubble. No credible economist even disputes this. The Clinton bubble was fueled by the aggressive financial deregulatory policies of Clinton and his Federal Reserve chairman, Alan Greenspan. When the stock market bubble burst, millions of people who previously would have received welfare fell into poverty.

Welfare reform was an intentional effort to curb financial assistance to poor people, on the grounds that many were simply too lazy to get a job. Clinton turned over a federal program to states, who were effectively allowed to slash welfare funding and impose new work requirements on people who received assistance. Even Republican co-architects of welfare reform concede that the program ended up hurting the poor.
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
5. That's good.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:10 PM
Apr 2016

Even though politi-fact seems kind of weak to me, it's nice they gave this a mostly false. It probably should have been all false.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Politifact: Fact-checking...