2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumObama warns Democrats against a 'Tea Party mentality'
President Obama on Thursday warned Democrats against adopting a Tea Party mentality that could lead to deep divisions within the party and harm its chances of winning national elections.
...
The thing Democrats have to guard against is going in the direction that the Republicans are much further along on, and that is this sense 'we are just going to get our way, and if we dont, then well cannibalize our own, kick them out and try again,' he said at a town-hall meeting with law students in Chicago.
In that scenario, Democrats could stake out positions so extreme, they alienate the broad public, Obama added. I dont see that being where the Democrats go, but its always something we have to pay attention to.
...
Obama said he understood the populist sentiment that has driven Sanderss candidacy. But he said the answer is not to abandon a compromise approach.
The danger, whether for Democrats or Republicans, is in a closed-loop system where everybody is just listening to the people who agree with them, he said.
And that anybody who suggests there is another point of view ... well, then you must be a sellout or you must be corrupted or you must be on the take or what have you," he added. "That is not, I think, useful.
LINK: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/275546-obama-warns-dems-against-tea-party-mentality
haikugal
(6,476 posts)ashtonelijah
(340 posts)Ground and air war in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Egypt, Libya, Crimea, Russia.
No Medicaid expansion. Pre-existing conditions still prevent people from getting healthcare. No requirements for employers.
7-2 right wing Supreme Court.
No marriage equality. Anti-discrimination laws completely dismantled. Voter disenfranchisement on steroids.
Poor response to the financial crisis. A total descent into a Great Depression II. The death of any sense of the middle class.
Yeah. Since Obama's been so disappointing and not worth listening to, I so wish you could experience a world where he never won.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Begone! Off to the ignore list for you!
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I'll stop sticking pins in gasbags to see if they'll pop and go hang in a nice, closed forum for a while until I recover my equilibrium and remember what we're really trying to do.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Functioning Spine who isn't a corporate hack.
Thanks.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)that it isnt even , as they say, funny.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)you are pissed.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)desmiller
(747 posts)I'm about to experience a world that you never have posted here.
Naughty list you go!!
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)President Obama provided the ability for more people to get health INSURANCE.
That's completely different than increasing access to actual CARE.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)And a hell of a lot of us aren't willing to keep compromising and compromising and fucking compromising. All that's done over the last 3+ decades is facilitate a long, slow, and unbearably painful shift to the center-right for the Democratic Party.
No more.
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)But what do my rights matter? I hope you enjoy sticking it to the man.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)'Coz unless you can connect the dots, you've got one hell of a disjunct going there...
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)My state, just last week, passed a law saying that not only can business owners discriminate against LGBT people and refuse to service us, but so can PUBLIC EMPLOYEES if they cite a religious objection.
How do we get a law like that overturned? Well, right now, because of President Obama's appointments to not only the Supreme Court, but the federal and circuit courts, such a law is doomed to be overturned.
But under a President Trump or Cruz? The Supreme Court will be decimated. Not only will Justice Scalia be replaced with another hard right winger, but it's very likely that Justices Kennedy, Ginsberg, and Breyer will not still be on the court 8 years from now; they are already passed the average age of retirement. That would mean we would lose a moderate and two liberal justices and have them replaced by hard right wing justices. Suddenly, we have a 7-2 hard right Supreme Court that will decimate all LGBT rights and women's rights, including marriage equality and reproductive rights.
Now, if you're a white man living in California, you're probably good. Your state isn't likely to pass discriminatory laws against you. But if you're a minority in a red state? You've no idea.
Not all of us are as privileged as our liberal blue state brethren who can afford to sit out or protest or vote third party in an election because the Democratic nominee wasn't pure enough for them. Some of us actually have something at stake. Not all of us are as insulated from the fallout as say, Susan Sarandon.
smiley
(1,432 posts).... yeah right.
Any other candidate in any other primary election, would be immediately disqualified as a liability to their party if they had an ongoing FBI investigation looking into their very negligent handling of issues related to national security.
Why people think she is the better candidate is beyond me. But I guess you must have your reasons, which I don't see anywhere in your post.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)You live in a state certain to go "red." I live in a state (Oregon) certain to go "blue." My rejecting a center-right candidate, should the Democratic Party nominate one, has zero effect on the election (and thus the composition of the SCOTUS). If either of us lived in swing states, the calculus might change...but we don't.
Moreover, overturning either marriage equality or the right to an abortion (as important an issue to me, personally, as the former is to you...seeing as how I'm a woman) would require ignoring stare decisis. Yes, that can happen...but it's damned uncommon and damned unlikely.
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)And it was because of a last minute change of heart Justice Kennedy, the moderate Republican appointee that will likely be replaced, that it wasn't.
Stare decisis means nothing to a court full of right wing extremists like Scalia, Thomas, and Alito.
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)I really need to remember not to tack on secondary points...
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)for George Bush war.
astrophuss42
(290 posts)It's pretty clear at this point at this point for most it's one or the other.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)But just as beneficial to corporations and the uber wealthy.
I really don't care what Obama wants me to do. There were a lot of things I wanted him to do, things that he sort of indicated he would do, back when he wanted my vote. Somehow he never found the time to do those things. So as far as I'm concerned, eff him and the "compromise approach" he rode in on.
But you know, personally, I still like the guy.
merrily
(45,251 posts)than Hillary did--and without pointlessly alienating Republicans. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1674423
Not the first time traditional Democrats have been compared with teabaggers. Thanks, Mr. President!
Lodestar
(2,388 posts)This calls for a big correction to the left. And Bernie is the guy to do it.
He's been in government for a long time, knows the game and the people.
Besides, Bernie is NOT extreme. He's juuuuuuust right for where America
is.
Despite What Corporate Media Tells You, Bernie Sanders Positions Are Mainstream
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016151351
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)both would cause great harm to the majority of people if they don't get their way.
The danger, whether for Democrats or Republicans, is in a closed-loop system where everybody is just listening to the people who agree with them, he said.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)The danger, whether for Democrats or Republicans,
is in a closed-loop system where everybody is just listening to
the people who agree with them, he said.
people are do this.lol
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)Yes, I believe that Obama gave a free pass to the Wall Street criminals because of the corrupting influence of Wall Street donations to his campaign.
American cannot afford another president who refuses to prosecute Wall Street criminals and refuses to help the people the banks stole homes from via mortgage fraud.
I HOPE the Democrats start being as afraid of their energized base as the Republicans are afraid of the tea partiers.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Where compromise trumps principle, and hope and change are commodities to be traded on during election year, then forgotten because they're not pragmatic.
Meteor Man
(385 posts)by the Washington Consensus. I don't see how TPP and a trillion dollar modernization of nuclear weapons, ON TOP of an already massive and massively corrupt military budget are considered mainstream democratic party policies.
Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)instead of policies would see valid criticisms of Obama's policies and positions as 'hatred'.
Sorry we are adults.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)who didnt get every single thing they wanted from Obama so under the bus he went.
TM99
(8,352 posts)dude, I am bi-racial. What you think we PoC all worship Obama? You think we all fell for the Hope & Change ad campaign? You think we all like neoliberal economic policies and a continuance of the Bush Doctrine?
Get over yourself and yours supposed ability to 'see hatred' cause I wouldn't quit my day job if I was you.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)I want no more of that crap.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)decided not to listen, who is supporting Bernie.
You seem oblivious to the power of over 40% of
the voters, called independents.
And thanks for calling Bernie supporters tea partiers.
Oh I know that you did not mention his name, but
we have learned to read beyond your "great speeches".
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Response to ashtonelijah (Original post)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
marybourg
(12,633 posts)n/t
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)ashtonelijah
(340 posts)Y'all are so oblivious.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I think I'll take my privilege and vote for who the fuck I feel like voting for. Further questions, zippy?
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)the internals must REALLY be bad if he had to do this.
Stallion
(6,476 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)or the kind that back common folk?
dubyadiprecession
(5,719 posts)Otherwise it will just turn into a dictatorship.
I don't know anyone who wants a third world government in the United States.
Democrats are frustrated, but guess what? Republicans are frustrated too.
Nobody has won everything and nobody has lost everything.
We all have to work together and avoid extremist behavior.
Meteor Man
(385 posts)Because compromise and avoiding extremist behavior is how republicans moved the Reagan Revolution into the mainstream Washington Consensus.
Oh yeah. Compromise. Also known as the Third Way Surrender Strategy.
jillan
(39,451 posts)MineralMan
(146,320 posts)If I ignored people, I'd add many in this thread. This is so far out of hand. We have choices. Let us hope we make the right one in November. If we do not, the mistake may never be corrected.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)That's okay. I don't like his administration. It was his education policy that turned me Independent.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)....is going the direction the Republicans are much further along on....."
Key words indeed from our President! Who here at DU could disagree that the Republican Party represents the upper crust(aceans), that their party is 'of by and for' the highest bidder?
Mr. President, should we voting Democrats sit idely by while our Party goes the way of the Republicans? No sir, I think not! When it comes to a government Of, By, and For the citizenry, we will not go down without a fight! That Sir is what feeling the Bern is all about!
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)The Tea Party and their self righteous arrogance thought that they could rule with an iron fist. They sullied the word "compromise". They called anyone in their Party that dared to disagree with their extremism, RINO's. They didn't care that they didn't have 60 votes in the Senate. Yet, they promised their base that they would repeal everything. The result of this strategy led to the current meltdown of the Republican Party.
Now Sanders and his crowd want to copy the Tea Party's strategy. In their self righteous arrogance, they think that they too can rule with an iron fist. They also have sullied the word "compromise". They too call anyone that dare disagree with their extremism DINO's and Third Wayers. They too have a problem with basic math. In fact, the Tea Party could count on more votes than Sanders and his ilk. They too will fail. They too risk melting down are Party.
The President hit the nail on the head. Is there anyone out there that still wishes to question which candidate the President supports ?
Meteor Man
(385 posts)Your description of "Sanders and his crowd" applies far better to The Third Way/DLC/Hillary fanatics who have trashed the cornerstone principles that served working Americans from FDR to Carter.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Meteor Man
(385 posts)President Obama is entitled to his opinion, but his perspective on politics is jaded by the Washington consensus.
RashaMZak
(32 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)....
DerekG
(2,935 posts)And just think, in a few weeks, the Establishment is going to hate us lefties even more...
DCBob
(24,689 posts)and endorsement of Hillary.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)and lets face it, it certainly appears as though she could use a good movement.
2cannan
(344 posts)tokenlib
(4,186 posts)...after twenty-five years or so it can cause deep divisions in a party that can endanger its unity.
RashaMZak
(32 posts)Was it not a coalition of lefties, liberals, and activists that propelled you past Hillary to victory... and ensured you a landslide against McCain, in hopes that you would govern like the progressive you campaigned as? People are right to feel betrayed and angry by the centrism and center-right "compromises" that followed. In retrospect, many of us like myself were much more naive then and caught up in other greater narratives. I am grateful for healthcare reform - being chronically ill with a worsening autoimmune illness, I'm screwed without it. However, I can't really afford healthcare much more than I could before. Too sick to work full time, not sick enough to be "disabled". Struggling like many others in my generation to find work, let alone work with wages that'll cover my premiums or deductible - medicaid won't cover some important treatments. You would dare compare us to the tea party for wanting fair wages, better healthcare access, economic justice, investigation/prosecution of financial manipulators, progressive taxation, de-escalation of foreign military activity, and a stronger hand at the negotiating table? For holding our own elected politicians accountable for the effects of their decisions upon us? For anger that it would be our own democratic president who would be first to offer SS for the chopping block, to push a disastrously expensive nuclear weapon plan in the background of the election noise? I voted for you as a lofty-eyed late teen, glad I was voting -for- someone rather than against. 8 years later, I wonder who I truly voted for then.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)2cannan
(344 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Beautifully said. Why did he campaign so far to the left and then pivot hard-right when he got elected? That wasn't compromise, it was defection. He's the last person who should be wagging his finger at lefties in the Party who haven't jumped ship in utter disgust. We gave him the WH and he gave us the shaft.
#WhichBarackObama
peacebird
(14,195 posts)He refuses compromise and stands on principle. Like his opposition to IWR, to TPP, etc.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)CrispyQ
(36,487 posts)Oops! Too fucking late.
Response to ashtonelijah (Original post)
imari362 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)And that anybody who suggests there is another point of view ... well, then you must be a sellout or you must be corrupted or you must be on the take or what have you,".."That is not, I think, useful."
... Amen.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)All you are doing is putting yourself on the wrong side if history. If not now, with Bernie, the movement WILL succeed and change our corporotocracy back into a democracy. You'll see. The people simply can't survive if it doesn't.
.