Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:16 AM Apr 2016

On "diagnosis", from an MD.

For every disease, every "diagnosis", there is one "gold-standard" treatment. Anything less is considered malpractice.

For the crises that face us, Bernie Sanders is proposing the gold-standard treatment.

Clinton's incrementalism amounts to malpractice.

If Hillary wants to claim "difficulty" as an excuse for not doing what is best, medicine is a poor analogy.

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On "diagnosis", from an MD. (Original Post) Barack_America Apr 2016 OP
The real issue is who can accomplish the most Dem2 Apr 2016 #1
It will be lot less than promised. True Xipe Totec Apr 2016 #3
"I went with the second-best treatment, because it was easier" Barack_America Apr 2016 #4
No this is not. TM99 Apr 2016 #5
Great post, nt. Broward Apr 2016 #19
A: No, the real issue is who can accomplish the most that will actually help the American people. Scuba Apr 2016 #18
Decapitation? Take two aspirin and call me in the morning nt Xipe Totec Apr 2016 #2
lol hill2016 Apr 2016 #6
Your post makes no sense. Barack_America Apr 2016 #8
ok hill2016 Apr 2016 #10
you would also know hill2016 Apr 2016 #11
Requires recognition of the gold-standard... Barack_America Apr 2016 #12
or what about hill2016 Apr 2016 #13
Such trials go through extensive scrutiny by an IRB and patients receive full... Barack_America Apr 2016 #14
what about hill2016 Apr 2016 #15
Hillary's position would be "there aren't going to be any organs, so I won't bother... Barack_America Apr 2016 #16
ok what about letting hill2016 Apr 2016 #17
If your aim here was to come across bvf Apr 2016 #23
Dammit Maddie, the cure is leeches! n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #7
For polycythemia vera, yes. This would be akin to "bleeding" the 1%. Barack_America Apr 2016 #9
I don't believe she'll increment anything. I believe she'll take the votes and ignore the voters for Zira Apr 2016 #20
Every disease has a treatment standard...which doesn't mean a cure or even an ameliorative... HereSince1628 Apr 2016 #21
Why talk about gold standards when you're still struggling with, "First, do no harm"? n/t winter is coming Apr 2016 #22
The best treatment is that which can be done practically at any given time. baldguy Apr 2016 #24
what about hill2016 Apr 2016 #25
What is so funny... northernsouthern Apr 2016 #26

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
1. The real issue is who can accomplish the most
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:23 AM
Apr 2016

With a Congress that is likely to be difficult to deal with, even if Democrats are somehow able get a slight majority in both houses.

I don't know the answer, but I do know it will be lot less than promised.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
3. It will be lot less than promised. True
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:25 AM
Apr 2016

So pick the one that promises more.

In the end, you get more that way than if you choose the one who promises less, and still delivers a lot less than promised.

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
4. "I went with the second-best treatment, because it was easier"
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:26 AM
Apr 2016

Hard to defend in court.

My point is, Hillary seemed quite enamoured with talking about "diagnosing" problems vs. treating them.

I don't think this argument works for her.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
5. No this is not.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:30 AM
Apr 2016

In fact this 'real issue' is actually a false one demonstrating a lack of historical knowledge.

Name one time in American political history where the opposition party did not fight the party in power's attempts to enact their agenda?

You can't because that is politics. The GOP fought FDR and LBJ. The Dems fought Reagan and GW Bush. That is the reality of politics.

The real issue is which candidate will fight for their positions and which candidate will triangulate and over compromise on their positions. Recent history shows us that New Dems will triangulate and over compromise. Bill Clinton will work with the GOP to pass Welfare Reform, omnibus crime bills, overturn banking regulations, and push NAFTA. Obama will work with the GOP to water down universal health insurance until it is nothing but an insurance mandate JUST like HeritageCare. He will work with the GOP against his own fucking party to push another disastrous free trade deal, the TPP.

So, I don't want Hillary Clinton, yet another New Dem, anywhere near the reigns of power with so much control being held by the GOP. She will compromise and triangulate away my and my children's future. Sanders will fight them. He may not get all he wants, but him fighting will get other Dems fighting. New Dems will be primaried out. Other progressives will eventually take back the congress, and then, he will have a chance to get it done.

I want a chance at that reality as opposed to the triangulated one that I know will come if Clinton, another New Dem, is elected.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
18. A: No, the real issue is who can accomplish the most that will actually help the American people.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:11 AM
Apr 2016

B: Regarding your "less than promised" statement, what has been promised and by whom?

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
8. Your post makes no sense.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:34 AM
Apr 2016

Generic and branded drugs have the same chemical structure and accomplish the same goal.

Hillary and Bernie do not.

If she wants to claim "difficulty" as an out for doing what is best, medicine was a poor analogy.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
10. ok
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:39 AM
Apr 2016

what about biosimilars and biologics?

if a given biologics is the standard of care, isn't biosimilar an inferior version and be malpractice according to you?

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
11. you would also know
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:42 AM
Apr 2016

that standard of care depends on the specific circumstances at hand SUCH AS medical resources available.

In a MCI, Is it malpractice to triage patients and let the black-tagged die?

Whoops here's real-world issues coming in. That's the problem with Bernie. Never acknowledges real world practical issues. Such as lack of resources.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
13. or what about
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:46 AM
Apr 2016

patients in the experimental arm in a clinical trial? Is it malpractice if you have no idea whether the new drug is better or worse than existing standard of care?

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
14. Such trials go through extensive scrutiny by an IRB and patients receive full...
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:50 AM
Apr 2016

...informed consent before participating. Otherwise, absolutely. But such behavior is blatantly illegal in this country, beyond civil malpractice.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
15. what about
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:53 AM
Apr 2016

a patient awaiting a transplant...but there are no organs available.

Can he sue for malpractice?

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
16. Hillary's position would be "there aren't going to be any organs, so I won't bother...
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:56 AM
Apr 2016

...putting you on the donation list".

And, yes, that would be malpractice if he/she were eligible to be listed.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
17. ok what about letting
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:03 AM
Apr 2016

residents treat patients? If they screw up due to their inexperience, can they get sued for malpractice?

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
9. For polycythemia vera, yes. This would be akin to "bleeding" the 1%.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:37 AM
Apr 2016

I would readily prescribe this treatment.

 

Zira

(1,054 posts)
20. I don't believe she'll increment anything. I believe she'll take the votes and ignore the voters for
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:13 AM
Apr 2016

3.5 years - until she's campaigning again. I'm saying this because that's what she did as a senator.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
21. Every disease has a treatment standard...which doesn't mean a cure or even an ameliorative...
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:36 AM
Apr 2016

what that means is there's an accepted path to compensation for the medical profession if they do the standard treatment.

The problem with Clinton's incrementalism is it's -all about maintaining- the paths to unwarranted levels of compensation and welfare for corporations in exchange for giving the ailing people in the economy -nothing-.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
24. The best treatment is that which can be done practically at any given time.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:44 AM
Apr 2016

Holding out for the one "gold-standard" treatment is often fatal to the patient.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
25. what about
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 03:04 PM
Apr 2016

this http://www.reuters.com/article/us-express-scripts-abbvie-hepatitisc-idUSKBN0K007620141222

Gilead's HCV drug was taken off the formulary and replaced with Abbvie's drug. Gilead's regimen is superior but more expensive. Is it malpractice to prescribe Abbvie's drug?

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
26. What is so funny...
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 03:07 PM
Apr 2016

The Nurses unions are all for him, my lady is a nurse, a majority see the problem that is going on...we should listen to them.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»On "diagnosis",...