Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

VirginiaTarheel

(823 posts)
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 10:20 AM Oct 2012

Rasmussen tries to Cover His Hiney

Scott Rasmussen said this this morning:

All signs point to a close race with just over a week to go. In fact, current polling suggests it might be close enough to produce a split decision, with Mitt Romney winning the popular vote and the president keeping his job with a victory in the Electoral College.

Most national polls show Romney with a very slight lead of around 2 percentage points.


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rasmussen tries to Cover His Hiney (Original Post) VirginiaTarheel Oct 2012 OP
Don't you love how he phrases this crap? fugop Oct 2012 #1
ALL analysts, media people do this Cosmocat Oct 2012 #3
Setting us Up for the State Legislature Option AndyTiedye Oct 2012 #4
No surprise here. Lasher Oct 2012 #2
Finally, a reason to be grateful for 2000? PsychProfessor Oct 2012 #5

fugop

(1,828 posts)
1. Don't you love how he phrases this crap?
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 10:29 AM
Oct 2012

Mitt "wins" but Obama just "keeps his job."

I know that's semantics, but seriously, it feels like he's downplaying how Obama might just hold on through that stupid Electoral College victory. Not a real win, like Mitt with the popular kids ... I mean, popular vote.

I love looking at Rasmussen's swing state map, too. You look at the top line Electoral Vote numbers and Obama's only ahead by 2. But then you look at the states Ras has as tossups and almost every one of them has Obama in the lead. He's already assigned Florida and NC to Romney. But his tossups are states like Nevada, Iowa and Wisconsin, as well as Ohio and New Hampshire. The only state he seems to have left as a swing that seems to lean Romney is Colorado.

Boy, talk about desperate.

Cosmocat

(14,567 posts)
3. ALL analysts, media people do this
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 10:33 AM
Oct 2012

except for strident democrats and liberals.

Most know flat well they are being snarky republican shills, some simply do not have the self awareness to know they have been bitch whipped by the republicans.

AndyTiedye

(23,500 posts)
4. Setting us Up for the State Legislature Option
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 10:37 AM
Oct 2012

If Mitwit wins the popular vote but would lose the EC, repig state legislatures will try to flip their states red by legislation, as Florida's legislature was threatening to do in 2000.

PsychProfessor

(204 posts)
5. Finally, a reason to be grateful for 2000?
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 10:53 AM
Oct 2012

If as a nation we had not lived through the election of 2000, how might we react to a split decision? I was up in arms that Al Gore did not fight tooth and nail about the situation in 2000. I was outraged that the winner of the popular vote was denied the presidency. But democrats lived with the laws of the land and GWB became our president. As awful as all that was and still is, it does set a precedent that, yes, we live in this country with these laws and the winner of the electoral college is the winner of the election. I don't care if Romney wins the popular vote due to landslides in the reddest of the red states. I would actually not even care if those states decided to leave the union and have Mitt Romney as their president. How they would survive without the states that provide them with so much federal money is of course anyone's guess. But if President Obama wins the EV, they can all go f*ck themselves. Suck it up. God knows we did in 2000.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Rasmussen tries to Cover ...