Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:31 AM Apr 2016

Clinton Camp says She's Been Forced to the Left Enough Already

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/04/29/clinton-camp-says-shes-been-forced-left-enough-already

That's not all that surprising, given factors apart from Sanders, Ehrenfreund writes. He points to data from Pew Research Center showing Americans' attitudes on various issues including race, poverty, regulation, and foreign policy are becoming more progressive. And there's also the influence of politicians like Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in areas like Social Security, he notes.

But Amie Parnes writes at The Hill, "Clinton supporters argue the former secretary of State has already been forced to the left by Sanders, and can't risk moving further ahead of a general election."

And while political talk show host Bill Press told The Hill that it would be the wrong move for Clinton to "move back to the center," Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.), told the political website that her campaign couldn't make any more leftward concessions, saying, "I don't know what's left to extract."

Cleaver added that "[Sanders has] already impacted this election probably more than anyone else including Donald Trump," and then suggested it was time for Sanders to help gather support for his rival.

Parnes also cites an anonymous Clinton ally who said, "We can't do it," regarding meeting some of Sanders' policy demands.
62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton Camp says She's Been Forced to the Left Enough Already (Original Post) eridani Apr 2016 OP
It's sad she won't budge, because Bernie voters by and large want the platform not the person BirdieSanders Apr 2016 #1
Spoken like True Conservatives! Chasstev365 Apr 2016 #2
Buhahahahahaha pengu Apr 2016 #3
Hahahahaha! Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #4
She doesn't need to chase after Bernie's "fringe rally goers" for their ... NurseJackie Apr 2016 #5
Progressive Liberalism not welcome in the United States of Monsanto or in the Land of the Goldman Armstead Apr 2016 #8
It's over. He lost ... better luck next time. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #12
"Frings goers" while most of America agrees with Bernie? Legit pinebox Apr 2016 #15
She'll be fine. That's why she's WINNING, and that's why ... NurseJackie Apr 2016 #16
She is WINNING among a bubble pinebox Apr 2016 #18
Your ineffective posts change nothing. Hillary will be the nominee and she'll win by a landslide. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #20
Uh huh explain this to everybody and we'll wait pinebox Apr 2016 #22
See? This is why y'all lost. Obsessing about things you can't change... NurseJackie Apr 2016 #28
Hillary hasn't won lol pinebox Apr 2016 #30
Bernie can't win. He's lost. It's over. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #34
Your posts are so thoughtful vintx Apr 2016 #23
Your posts are what is making DU choie Apr 2016 #32
Absolutely correct, choie! CobaltBlue Apr 2016 #55
Cut the crap with the grave dancing... Buddyblazon May 2016 #61
Attn. Nurse Jackie CobaltBlue Apr 2016 #53
Hillary is an uneven table that is slighty tilted to the right Sky Masterson Apr 2016 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author CobaltBlue Apr 2016 #7
Hillary will try to be gracious but anyone would be kidding themselves if they think she'll morph Trust Buster Apr 2016 #9
Sounds like Trump is going to win. Seriously she won't budge any at all? What about B Calm Apr 2016 #10
One talk show host and 'unnamed sources'. Brilliant journalism! randome Apr 2016 #11
I hate anonymous sources, but could you edit your excerpts to reflect the actual article? moriah Apr 2016 #13
Her platform is to the right of a lot of republican voters (social security for example) so the tric Doctor_J Apr 2016 #14
It's good they're just blowing us off. vintx Apr 2016 #25
When haven't they? eom zalinda Apr 2016 #57
Why are they whining? She'll never adopt Sanders' positions - just his words eom LiberalElite Apr 2016 #17
Don't worry, Princess Weathervane! No one believed your hedging left in the first place. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #19
Of course they can't do it BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #21
Wish this was an OP vintx Apr 2016 #26
I think it was completely accurate that the Hillary spokesperson said "we can't do it" BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #29
I keep hearing Clinton will destroy Trump in the general because of Trumps obvious negatives Teamster Jeff Apr 2016 #56
Trump is to the left of Hillary on free trade so there's plenty of space to move left. Broward Apr 2016 #24
He is going to kill her on that issue BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #27
If he did go for CFR and the banks (which I doubt will happen) it would be a landslide vintx Apr 2016 #31
There is nothing to stop him from going there BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #36
If he goes populist it's over vintx Apr 2016 #37
It's the obvious strategy if Trump wants to win BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #39
She would have the establishment behind her vintx Apr 2016 #45
Hillary will also be the only candidate of the two that voted for the Iraq War. Broward Apr 2016 #33
he'll just smirk, turn to the audience Tannen-style, and MisterP Apr 2016 #40
She's open to numerous lines of attack. She''ll make a terrible general election candidate Broward Apr 2016 #41
"nuh-uh, she won't, because I don't want her to be" MisterP Apr 2016 #42
He is not 'to the left'. He is to the Coolidge/Hoover isolationist side. That is not 'left'. pampango Apr 2016 #48
Hillary isn't forced to the Left, just forced to parrot Bernie's talking points. PeoViejo Apr 2016 #35
Exactly. No one forced her. Ino Apr 2016 #38
^This. AzDar Apr 2016 #43
Now she's beaten Bernie, she most certainly will not move further to the left. Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #44
I don't see anyone from "Camp Clinton" quoted in the story. pampango Apr 2016 #46
gee..where...cuz I'm still looking for a reason outside the shit and shittier argument. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #47
DUPE Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #49
And she will snap back as soon as she is able. artislife Apr 2016 #50
Embrace the left and win big, or pivot to the center and win by the margins killbotfactory Apr 2016 #51
She's afraid of being called a liberal. Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #52
She'd get Republicans if she would do it. They do not understand the electorate. snowy owl Apr 2016 #54
bless it Hiraeth Apr 2016 #58
What I'm hearing when I read that headline. Chan790 Apr 2016 #59
Not listening to the electorate, felix_numinous Apr 2016 #60
"he might be on the winning side in the contest over the party's future." pat_k May 2016 #62

BirdieSanders

(26 posts)
1. It's sad she won't budge, because Bernie voters by and large want the platform not the person
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:43 AM
Apr 2016

If I had to guess, I'd say Jill Stein is going to pull closer to double-digits than she ever has before

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
5. She doesn't need to chase after Bernie's "fringe rally goers" for their ...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:28 AM
Apr 2016

... individual votes (especially considering their frequent "no show" habits).

For every ONE of these "lost" hardcore Bernie voters (and despite their malcontent threats to vote for Jill Stein,) there are a DOZEN other votes from reasonable people in the center that she will earn elsewhere instead.

She'll be fine right where she is! :-D

No matter the threats from the bitter Bernie fans, the trade-off of Hillary pursuing (consoling?) those unreliable voters isn't worthwhile.

National elections aren't won by appealing exclusively to the fringe or extremes ... Hillary is smart enough to know that.

Besides, you wouldn't expect Bernie to shift, modulate, moderate and concede anything to win over Hillary voters ... why demand more from Hillary than you would expect from your own candidate?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
8. Progressive Liberalism not welcome in the United States of Monsanto or in the Land of the Goldman
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:50 AM
Apr 2016
?itok=faQPIQHm

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
12. It's over. He lost ... better luck next time.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:56 AM
Apr 2016

Instead of complaining and continuing with the same tactics that have already failed, his hardcore fans should reflect on the mistakes and what to do differently next time.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
16. She'll be fine. That's why she's WINNING, and that's why ...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:50 AM
Apr 2016

... she has more media endorsements, more labor union endorsements, more Senatorial endorsements, more US Rep endorsements, more Gubernatorial endorsements, more state-level rep endorsements than Sanders.

Eventually, reality will sink it ... but I'll go ahead and tell you again ... BERNIE WILL NOT BE THE NOMINEE. At this late date, nothing you say or do will change that.

There aren't enough charts, videos, attacks, smears, online polls, RW websites, self-serving RW polls, or lunatic columnists that you can link-to that will change that fact. Hillary won. Bernie lost. There will be no convention floor-show, there will be no en mass flipping of super-delegates. This thing is over. OVER. Deal with it.

Time for Bernie's hardcore fans to lick their wounds, regroup, do some inward reflecting, adjust, find a better candidate with a better delivery and a better message with better plan and try again.



 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
18. She is WINNING among a bubble
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:56 AM
Apr 2016

Endorsements are meaningless. Literally. Ask yourself why big corps are the 1% are endorsing Hillary while the worker bees vote Bernie.

Reality will sink in with you too when Hillary loses a GE *should* she be the nominee because most of America can't stand her. Her favorability numbers clearly show that yet it's head in the sand while polls show Bernie smokin' every single GOP candidate. Only Bernie does that. Hillary, popular among 55% of Dems ONLY.

You want lunacy? Here, let me give you a hand. You support this. Most of America doesn't. Yup, that's lunacy alright. Yet you outright ignore it because everything truly is unicorns and rainbows in "Hillaryland". Time for Hillary fans to face the music, America isn't electing a candidate under an FBI investigation.




NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
20. Your ineffective posts change nothing. Hillary will be the nominee and she'll win by a landslide.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:10 AM
Apr 2016


Time for the hardcore Bernie supporters to lick their wounds, regroup, reflect, analyze their failures, build on successes, find a better candidate, a better message, a better plan and try again later.

It's over. Over.


 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
22. Uh huh explain this to everybody and we'll wait
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:15 AM
Apr 2016

Time for you to face the music but you won't. You'll keep sticking your fingers in your ears and ignoring facts as per is the course with Hillary supporters. You can lead a Hillary supporter to water but you can't make them drink.

And as much as you wish it was over, it isn't. Hillary won't have the numbers going into the convention.

Meanwhile America says what?

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
28. See? This is why y'all lost. Obsessing about things you can't change...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:25 AM
Apr 2016

... I'd recommend looking to the future and figuring out a plan (and a candidate) that actually appeals to more people.

Or, you can just stand there and shake your fists at the castle gates. Whatever. Your choice.

I don't care what you do anymore.

Hillary won. Bernie lost. It's over.


 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
30. Hillary hasn't won lol
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:27 AM
Apr 2016

Your fantasy is quite hilarious lol
Can you show us Hillary's victory speech? We'll wait.



 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
23. Your posts are so thoughtful
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:17 AM
Apr 2016

You are obviously an intelligent person of some intellect

I respect you

choie

(4,111 posts)
32. Your posts are what is making DU
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:31 AM
Apr 2016

a really uncomfortable place to be. I've been here since 2004 and have seen this site deteriorate because of nasty and vindictive responses such as yours. You say Bernie supporters need to reflect?
Perhaps you should..

 

CobaltBlue

(1,122 posts)
55. Absolutely correct, choie!
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:57 PM
Apr 2016

Nurse Jackie should stop trolling the Democratic Party and move over to the Republican Party.

Sky Masterson

(5,240 posts)
6. Hillary is an uneven table that is slighty tilted to the right
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:29 AM
Apr 2016

Her position is a steel Marble.
Naturally it wants to roll toward the right.
Bernie is a Magnet.
He slows and drags her back towards the middle left of the table.
At the convention the table will be shimmed for the cameras
and we will have a candidate so far to the left that she will make
Amy Goodman sound like Carly Fiorina.
Then the table will be moved to the General and they will conveniently forget the shims.
And without the magnet pulling her towards the left she will roll right.
It would be better to flip the table around 180 and have the Marble want to roll the right way on its own.
But that metaphor is one that I don't have the steel balls to compose yet.

Response to eridani (Original post)

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
9. Hillary will try to be gracious but anyone would be kidding themselves if they think she'll morph
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:53 AM
Apr 2016

into Sanders. That's not what millions voted for. Hillary will stand on her agenda and no one else's.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
10. Sounds like Trump is going to win. Seriously she won't budge any at all? What about
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:54 AM
Apr 2016

the failed War on Drugs?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
11. One talk show host and 'unnamed sources'. Brilliant journalism!
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:55 AM
Apr 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]

moriah

(8,311 posts)
13. I hate anonymous sources, but could you edit your excerpts to reflect the actual article?
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:57 AM
Apr 2016

Just so there is no confusion:


Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.), told the political website that her campaign couldn't make any more leftward concessions, saying, "I don't know what's left to extract."

Cleaver added that &quot Sanders has) already impacted this election probably more than anyone else including Donald Trump," and then suggested it was time for Sanders to help gather support for his rival.


Just so no one who skips the article thinks that he was stating Hillary hsd been that person, instead of Bernie?

Given DU's unhappy dislike for brackets in formatting, that part being left out could have easily been the result of a technical glitch, so please don't take this request as a suggestion it was deliberately left out.
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
14. Her platform is to the right of a lot of republican voters (social security for example) so the tric
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:21 AM
Apr 2016

will be to siphon off enough feminists and get enough DINO to the polls, then hope that trump's even more unpopular than she is. She'll have a significant media advantage, and I think the billionaires are afraid that a loose cannon like trump is too risky. Charles Koch has already endorsed Clinton, for example.

A shame that the party wants to kiss off all of Sanders voters.

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
25. It's good they're just blowing us off.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:21 AM
Apr 2016

If the green party does better it will help them in the next election.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
19. Don't worry, Princess Weathervane! No one believed your hedging left in the first place.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:57 AM
Apr 2016

>Heartfelt principles.
>Hillary Clinton.
(pick one)

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
21. Of course they can't do it
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:13 AM
Apr 2016

Hillary's corporate and top 0.1% masters won't allow it.

No universal healthcare because big pharma and the health insurance companies won't allow it.

No breaking up the too big to fail banks because the banksters won't allow it.

No even handed approach to Israel because Haim Saban and other large contributors won't allow it.

No real action on climate change because big oil won't allow it.

No increase in the 15% "carried interest" tax rate because billionaire hedge fund managers won't allow it.

No free college tuition because the banks (student loans) and for profit education industry won't allow it.

No spending to repair our infrastructure without "public-private partnerships" because hedge funds and other investors want to be able to charge us tolls and user fees into perpetuity.

No halting TPP because the companies who want to export more jobs to low wage countries to increase profits and pay themselves larger bonuses won't allow it.

No stop to interventionist wars and regime changes because the military-industrial complex won't allow it.

No campaign finance reform because.....that one is self evident.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
29. I think it was completely accurate that the Hillary spokesperson said "we can't do it"
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:25 AM
Apr 2016

Instead of "we won't do it".

Teamster Jeff

(1,598 posts)
56. I keep hearing Clinton will destroy Trump in the general because of Trumps obvious negatives
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 03:14 PM
Apr 2016

and you have perfectly shown why Hillary will be another useless status quo president.

My question is will Bernie really go all in supporting a corrupt and rotting Democratic establishment.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
27. He is going to kill her on that issue
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:24 AM
Apr 2016

Along with campaign finance reform and breaking up the big banks if he is smart.

Can you imagine a campaign where the Republican candidate is to the left of the Democrat on free trade, banking and campaign finance, where a Democrat is trying to defend corporate interests over people?

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
31. If he did go for CFR and the banks (which I doubt will happen) it would be a landslide
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:30 AM
Apr 2016

Another Reagan revolution.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
36. There is nothing to stop him from going there
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:53 AM
Apr 2016

And he can easily get to the left of her on healthcare as well. He could get away with that by saying that Obamacare is a disaster. Premiums are going through the roof, even with the subsidies. But we can't cut off people's health insurance or get rid of preexisting conditions, so we need to just go to a single payer system. He can talk about how it would make U.S. business more competitive by allowing them to get rid of healthcare costs, and it would allow people not to have to stay with an employer to keep their healthcare. Over half of the people in the U.S. favor a single payer system, including over one quarter of Republicans. I believe if the issue was framed the right way (as blowing up that awful Obamacare, pro business, an issue of fairness and as anti-Hillary because she's owned by big pharma and big insurance), Republican support for it would go up significantly.

thehill.com/policy/healthcare/229959-majority-still-support-single-payer-option-poll-finds#

I think the smartest positioning for Trump would be a populist policy platform that basically concedes some corporatist Republican voters to Hillary, where they're likely to go anyway. His base doesn't care what he runs on, they're with him. In exchange for giving up some Republicans he could make a huge pitch for Independents and even some Democrats.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
39. It's the obvious strategy if Trump wants to win
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 10:21 AM
Apr 2016

He would have to be stupid not to do it. Hillary would be stuck in the middle defending the status quo, which the majority of the electorate is fervently opposed to, while he attacked her on some issues from the left and on other issues from the right. Hillary would have no defense on the issues. She would have to go virtually 100% negative.

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
45. She would have the establishment behind her
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:19 PM
Apr 2016

but could he motivate enough disaffected types to vote?

I wonder.

A lot of people here seem to think his nasty comments are enough to sink him. I get the impression from the people in my deep red area that they would look right past it.

Add populism to the mix and I bet he'd sway more than just those who can already tolerate him.

I still don't think it's likely, but if he did....

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
40. he'll just smirk, turn to the audience Tannen-style, and
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 10:28 AM
Apr 2016

"You say we're xenophobic warmongers? I'm an America Firster while you've repeatedly started wars even south of the border, bragged about deportations, and are the only one in this room who voted for the border wall! You say the GOP hates retirees? Your economic team is packed with people who say retirement should be at 70, 75! You have bidders already lining up for Social and Medicare! I tell my sheep that they're all on the dole, that they should get more of it, and they LOVE it! You say I hire illegals? Your policies have sent millions and millions of jobs overseas! You say I'm a huckster? You've bled hardworking whites dry and come back to town twenty years later with the same globalizing carny act! I'm racist? You cheerlead polices that jailed a third of (slur redacted) men and took credit for that as a fall in unemployment! I'm greedy? You're in the payday-lending party! It costs over five C's or twenty grand just to see you! I'm a bigmouth pandering to the audience? You literally reverse yourself within a week in front of different audiences, but we can't tell because your transcripts haven't been released for 243 days running! We're not even allowed to OVERHEAR what you're telling the people you actually work for! Your whole campaign is based on voters not knowing a damn thing you've done!"

Broward

(1,976 posts)
41. She's open to numerous lines of attack. She''ll make a terrible general election candidate
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 10:57 AM
Apr 2016

and a terrible president.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
48. He is not 'to the left'. He is to the Coolidge/Hoover isolationist side. That is not 'left'.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:25 PM
Apr 2016

At least not FDR's definition of 'left'. FDR spent his administration tearing down the high tariffs constructed by Coolidge and Hoover, then tried to construct a post-war world in which they did not come back. Perhaps in the 21st century Coolidge and Hoover were 'left' and FDR was 'right'.

 

PeoViejo

(2,178 posts)
35. Hillary isn't forced to the Left, just forced to parrot Bernie's talking points.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:51 AM
Apr 2016

Her World view has not changed. It's just another one of her sleazy tactics to con the voters into thinking she's on their side.

Ino

(3,366 posts)
38. Exactly. No one forced her.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 10:12 AM
Apr 2016

It was a typical cynical, manipulative, dishonest ploy. Just another example of how The Weathervane points whichever direction the wind blows. She has no principles or moral rudder, therefore she adopts whatever will achieve her ambition -- First Woman President™

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
44. Now she's beaten Bernie, she most certainly will not move further to the left.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:49 PM
Apr 2016

Now her interest will be in pealing off moderate Republican voters who can't stand Trump or Cruz. If anything she will pivot in the opposite direction (to the disappointment of quite a few DUers, no doubt).

pampango

(24,692 posts)
46. I don't see anyone from "Camp Clinton" quoted in the story.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:21 PM
Apr 2016
But Amie Parnes writes at The Hill, "Clinton supporters argue the former secretary of State has already been forced to the left by Sanders, and can't risk moving further ahead of a general election."

And while political talk show host Bill Press told The Hill that it would be the wrong move for Clinton to "move back to the center," Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.), told the political website that her campaign couldn't make any more leftward concessions, saying, "I don't know what's left to extract."

Cleaver added that " already impacted this election probably more than anyone else including Donald Trump," and then suggested it was time for Sanders to help gather support for his rival.

Parnes also cites an anonymous Clinton ally who said, "We can't do it," regarding meeting some of Sanders' policy demands.

There are quotes from a writer for The Hill, a political talk show host, a Democratic congressman and "an anonymous Clinton ally."
 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
47. gee..where...cuz I'm still looking for a reason outside the shit and shittier argument.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:24 PM
Apr 2016

I'm thinking my vote should go to whomever makes congress more miserable. Why should it only be the voters left miserable by their choices, and the end result of that?
They can work with Hillary of course, they have said that. So I don't think she will make them very miserable. If you think I'm wrong, show me her Goldman Sachs transcripts. Now. It was Goldman who said, they'd be happy with either Clinton or Bush!

killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
51. Embrace the left and win big, or pivot to the center and win by the margins
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:27 PM
Apr 2016

Big money doesn't support left wing ideas. In fact they hate them. They would commit murder, and have, to suppress left wing ideas.

Golly, I wonder what will happen in the GE.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
54. She'd get Republicans if she would do it. They do not understand the electorate.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:54 PM
Apr 2016

More similarity in tea party Repubs and Progressives than between moderate Republicans and tea partiers. i believe Progressives, centrist dems and tea partiers would support Bernie but centrist Republicans will support Trump. Tea partiers will not support Hillary unless she moves further left and sounds like Bernie. Will centrist republicans support Hillary or Trump?

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
59. What I'm hearing when I read that headline.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 05:35 PM
Apr 2016

"I don't want your vote, Chan." Also "I'm really trying to lose this election."

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
60. Not listening to the electorate,
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:16 PM
Apr 2016

election fraud, declaring yourself a winner without all the votes being counted. We can see through this facade, and it is not democratic.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
62. "he might be on the winning side in the contest over the party's future."
Sun May 1, 2016, 02:49 AM
May 2016

With or without Bernie as torch barer, it's up to us to make sure we win the "contest over the party's future."

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton Camp says She's B...