Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
Fri May 6, 2016, 02:28 AM May 2016

5/5/2016 State Dept to withhold docs related to HRC email until after election

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/state-dept-to-withhold-docs-related-to-clinton-e-mail-security-until-after-election/



The State Department on Tuesday notified Vice News that it will not release documents responsive to the news outlet’s FOIA requests related to the security of Hillary Clinton’s e-mail server until after the November election.

According to Vice News reporter Jason Koebler, soon after news broke of Clinton’s use of a private e-mail for State Department business, he filed a FOIA request with the State Department seeking “communications, presentations, and procedures created by the State Department to secure Hillary Clinton’s email from electronic threats.”

In his new report released on Thursday, Koebler describes how despite several promises from the State Department over the course of the past year to expedite the process, he is still waiting for responses about what procedures the State Department created to help keep Clinton’s e-mails and private server secure. Then, on Tuesday, Koebler received an e-mail update from the State Department regarding to “outgoing processing of his request” that informed him the estimated competition date had been stretched out again, until at least December 2016 — one month after the election.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
5/5/2016 State Dept to withhold docs related to HRC email until after election (Original Post) grasswire May 2016 OP
Oops. Coverup. HooptieWagon May 2016 #1
I believe that some entities will sue over this. grasswire May 2016 #3
Agreed. It's a suit the SD will lose... HooptieWagon May 2016 #5
WTF? AzDar May 2016 #2
Lawnewz is Dan Abrahms shop. grasswire May 2016 #4
unacceptable; they must be totally incriminating, else why suppress them amborin May 2016 #6
I just thought of something grasswire May 2016 #8
because I can't freaking figure out why it is up to the SD.. grasswire May 2016 #9
it always feels corrupt . . . snowy owl May 2016 #7
yes grasswire May 2016 #10
Could they get more shady? Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #11
It is a sort of mob. grasswire May 2016 #12
Clinton Mafia...Obama is part of The Family now. I'm sick of all the corruption! haikugal May 2016 #13

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
3. I believe that some entities will sue over this.
Fri May 6, 2016, 02:34 AM
May 2016

I still don't know why the State Department must spend money and resources to defend a former employee from lawful action. The emails belong to the people, not to HRC or the SD.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
5. Agreed. It's a suit the SD will lose...
Fri May 6, 2016, 02:39 AM
May 2016

...but they're just stalling for time, with no repercussions. Judge should start issuing contempt citations.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
8. I just thought of something
Fri May 6, 2016, 02:55 AM
May 2016

Maybe there's some incrimination for other top SD officials. Some sort of risk. And maybe HRC is exploiting that in a form of blackmail.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»5/5/2016 State Dept to ...