Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Zynx

(21,328 posts)
1. Heads up versus Hillary I think I would have voted for Warren.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:47 PM
Jun 2016

Last edited Thu Jun 9, 2016, 10:50 PM - Edit history (1)

I was unimpressed with Bernie's temperament. I've been proven right on that.

14. Senator Sanders
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 10:45 PM
Jun 2016


If Elizabeth Warren ran Bernie would not have run --both are working to end Citizens United, increase minimum wage, take on the banks, Wall Street, etc. I believe Bernie would have been thrilled @Warren Presidential Campaign & happily support her. Bernie ran because Hillary is for the status quo. Remember Elizabeth released a statement cheering Bernie on & urging him to stay in the race.

Zynx

(21,328 posts)
16. I think that Bernie has a troubling temperament and delusional tendencies.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 10:50 PM
Jun 2016

I think that Warren is a much stronger choice.

athena

(4,187 posts)
2. No way.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:47 PM
Jun 2016

She would have been deemed "too ambitious".

Women are loved as long as they accept their place as second-class citizens.

strategery blunder

(4,225 posts)
8. I believe part of the reason why Bernie ran was because Warren wouldn't.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:58 PM
Jun 2016

Either would have carried forward the progressive economic proposals that were the hallmark of Bernie's campaign.

Before Bernie announced, there was a significant Draft Warren movement, but she made clear she wasn't interested.

Bernie gave voice to those of us who would have had no voice if Hillary had not had to face a contested primary (an opportunity for Hillary that I believe the DNC, in no way believing a self-described socialist could get so far, tried its hardest to provide). If Warren had run and Bernie saw the economic issues of our time being addressed by Warren in the primary, I do not believe he would have run.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
11. Agreed
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 10:08 PM
Jun 2016

He seemed only to step up because she made it clear she wasn't going to.

And gotta say, if they were both in the race, I would have favored Warren. She suits my ideals, and would have clearly had a better chance at it than Sanders (wh also fits my ideals, but was always a long shot)



The fact that Bernie did as well as he did is still a shot in the arm for me, and hopefully for the rest of the left. No matter how much these Woodchucks want to "purge" us.

k8conant

(3,030 posts)
9. I was looking for Warren to run...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 10:01 PM
Jun 2016

and went for Sanders when she didn't run. No, he wouldn't have run.

Also, the Hillary people wouldn't have been able to pull all their sexist crap. I believe Warren would have beaten Clinton handily.

andym

(5,444 posts)
6. Only if Bernie did not run
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:53 PM
Jun 2016

They would have split the progressive vote. Otherwise she would have had a fighter's chance.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
10. No, she would have gotten the same kind of treatment Sanders did
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 10:03 PM
Jun 2016

No one but Hillary was going to win this primary.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
19. I think she would have underperformed Sanders
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 11:19 PM
Jun 2016

She's a rich northeastern white woman who gets hundreds of thousands of dollars for teaching a class at Harvard while complaining about college tuition. She's a white woman who called herself native American to increase her professional opportunities (if you think that would be glossed over in West Garbut I strongly disagree). Her national favorables are in the red even without her launching a Presidential campaign. She gets plaudits from places like DU because she wants to "break up the banks" (whatever that means; FWIW she's said she loves Clinton's Wall Street plan) but as hard as it is to accept, that one issue doesn't particularly move the needle nationally.

Basically, she'd have been a Bernie Sanders who didn't appeal as much to working class white men.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If Warren ran for preside...