Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFree Trade, DNC Platform and the Climate Crisis
Free Trade, DNC Platform and the Climate Crisis
Lukas Ross, Friends of the Earth Action
EcoWatch
The same day TransCanada sued the U.S. government for $15 billion, the Democratic Partys platform drafting committee met in Missouri. Between the two, there is a lesson to be learned about free trade and the climate crisis.
The lawsuit was the anticipated result of President Obama rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline. Using a notorious provision in the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Canadian oil giant is hoping to claim $15 billion in lost future profits by dragging the U.S. before an international tribunal. These sorts of extra-judicial forums, where corporations can sue governments for enforcing their own laws, are a hallmark of established free trade deals like NAFTA and looming ones like the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP).
Talking about responsible trade but refusing to be clear about the TPP isnt a good look, for the DNC or anyone else. If the TPP and its European counterpart, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, were both enacted, it would radically expand the power of fossil fuel companies to sue the U.S. for laws and regulations that hurt their expected future profits. The power to launch lawsuits like TransCanadas would be put on steroids and everything from local fracking bans to renewable energy mandates could be litigated in trade tribunals run overwhelmingly by corporate lawyers.
The good news is that Missouri isnt the end. The platform still needs to be approved by the full platform committee next month in Orlando and after that by the full convention in Philadelphia. When it comes to pushing back on trade and climate, there are still two more shots.
Lukas Ross, Friends of the Earth Action
EcoWatch
The same day TransCanada sued the U.S. government for $15 billion, the Democratic Partys platform drafting committee met in Missouri. Between the two, there is a lesson to be learned about free trade and the climate crisis.
The lawsuit was the anticipated result of President Obama rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline. Using a notorious provision in the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Canadian oil giant is hoping to claim $15 billion in lost future profits by dragging the U.S. before an international tribunal. These sorts of extra-judicial forums, where corporations can sue governments for enforcing their own laws, are a hallmark of established free trade deals like NAFTA and looming ones like the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP).
Talking about responsible trade but refusing to be clear about the TPP isnt a good look, for the DNC or anyone else. If the TPP and its European counterpart, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, were both enacted, it would radically expand the power of fossil fuel companies to sue the U.S. for laws and regulations that hurt their expected future profits. The power to launch lawsuits like TransCanadas would be put on steroids and everything from local fracking bans to renewable energy mandates could be litigated in trade tribunals run overwhelmingly by corporate lawyers.
The good news is that Missouri isnt the end. The platform still needs to be approved by the full platform committee next month in Orlando and after that by the full convention in Philadelphia. When it comes to pushing back on trade and climate, there are still two more shots.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 495 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Free Trade, DNC Platform and the Climate Crisis (Original Post)
portlander23
Jul 2016
OP
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)1. Lolololol
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)3. What a well-reasoned, detailed rebuttal...
...you haven't made.
Of course, some people don't mind looking silly. I guess you are one of those people.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)4. Meh, anything else will get me a hide or fun bumper sticker slogans.
lol sums it up in 3 little words.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)2. Facts. We can read TPP now.
THE BASIC FACTS ON ISDS
TPP specifically protects the right of governments to regulate in the public
interest. We would never negotiate away our right to do so, and we dont
ask other countries to do so either. This is true for public health and safety,
the financial sector, the environment, and any other area where governments
seek to regulate.
ISDS ensures that American businesses and investors do not face
discrimination, nationalization, or abuse when doing business abroad.
Through TPP, we can put in place higher standards and stronger safeguards
for ISDS.
ISDS is found in more than 3,000 existing agreements around the world,
covering 180 countries. The U.S. has taken part in 51 of these agreements
with ISDS over the last 30 years.
The United States has never lost an ISDS case. We have had only 13 cases
brought to conclusion against us, and the United States has prevailed in
every case. And in part because we have continued to raise standards
through each agreement, in recent years we have seen a drop in ISDS claims,
despite increased levels of cross-border investment. Only one new case has
been brought against the United States in the last five years.
More than half of companies that initiate ISDS cases are small- and
medium-sized businesses or individual investors, so the millions of
American workers they employ stand to potentially benefit from strong ISDS
TPP specifically protects the right of governments to regulate in the public
interest. We would never negotiate away our right to do so, and we dont
ask other countries to do so either. This is true for public health and safety,
the financial sector, the environment, and any other area where governments
seek to regulate.
ISDS ensures that American businesses and investors do not face
discrimination, nationalization, or abuse when doing business abroad.
Through TPP, we can put in place higher standards and stronger safeguards
for ISDS.
ISDS is found in more than 3,000 existing agreements around the world,
covering 180 countries. The U.S. has taken part in 51 of these agreements
with ISDS over the last 30 years.
The United States has never lost an ISDS case. We have had only 13 cases
brought to conclusion against us, and the United States has prevailed in
every case. And in part because we have continued to raise standards
through each agreement, in recent years we have seen a drop in ISDS claims,
despite increased levels of cross-border investment. Only one new case has
been brought against the United States in the last five years.
More than half of companies that initiate ISDS cases are small- and
medium-sized businesses or individual investors, so the millions of
American workers they employ stand to potentially benefit from strong ISDS
And...
Expectations of an investor. TPP explicitly clarifies that the mere fact that a
government measure frustrates an investors expectations does not itself give rise to an MST claim.
government measure frustrates an investors expectations does not itself give rise to an MST claim.
https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/TPP-Upgrading-and-Improving-Investor-State-Dispute-Settlement-Fact-Sheet.pdf