2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHere's some irony: Bernie Sanders is doing more to help Hillary than DWS is.
Despite losing to her in a vigorously contested primary, he's putting his own ego aside for the good of the country and yes the party.
DWS, on the other hand, has gone from party leader to a turd that won't flush.
"I can protect myself from my enemies; god save me from my friends."
Note: above quote only refers to DWS, not Sanders
EricMaundry
(1,619 posts)He is not accepting the hand of friendship Putin has extended to him.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)"Donald Trump is a unique threat to American democracy"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-is-a-unique-threat-to-american-democracy/2016/07/22/a6d823cc-4f4f-11e6-aa14-e0c1087f7583_story.html
bjobotts
(9,141 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)would attempt everything in his power to make sure Donald Trump did not become President. Since he (Bernie) is not the nominee, he is campaigning for the one who is.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I still take zero issue with the emails. This is ratfucking territory like we haven't seen before.
Can you imagine if we saw emails from the RNC, Weaver, etc?
We don't get to because transparency is not the goal with them.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)that this moment isn't about her.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Politicians have ego's.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)That is very clear. The DNC gave Sanders the largest platform he has ever had and helped him gain a stage he has never had.
They are a group of criminals working to thwart progress.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I guess when one can get away with rape, fight for conservatives across the globe, they feel insulated from any repercussion.
Wiki has a lot of knuckle dragging fans supporting their criminal organization all while fighting for conservatives across the globe. Putin is so dreamy. lol.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I also don't see any major issue with the leak. Manufactured outrage by the right that is doing minimal harm. Thankfully we have an excellent line-up and these right wing fucks will be embarrassed as we transition from last week to this week.
How many emails and this is the worst they have? How many DNC and Clinton emails have now been released from outlets? How many RNC and Trump emails?
This is beyond obvious.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)And the process overall was extremely fair. That is well known by all even though ratfuckers keep trying to sell something else.
Politics is dirty and there is no room for unicorns as they don't exist. The rainbow will arrive in November when we elect Clinton along with her very solid progressive platform.
Response to NCTraveler (Reply #30)
Post removed
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)More Rainbows!!!!
Maru Kitteh
(28,343 posts)and they should go there.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)although my hair is short enough to sneak into very conservative settings...
bjobotts
(9,141 posts)bjobotts
(9,141 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Of 20,000 emails there are a couple that discussed it, and actions are being taken on those who wrote them.
Can you link a single actual occurrence of the discussions in those emails being actioned by the DNC? That will be a very different discussion. Otherwise you are making false claims.
dynamo99
(48 posts)wasn't the goal with the DNC, either. No organization wants that kind of leak.
And we still don't know who penetrated their system, and who (maybe a different party) leaked the emails to Wikileaks. Or what their motives were, other than presumably to disrupt the Dem convention. Does Putin reciprocate Trump's love?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Let's at least be honest with the big picture.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)Not that she did it.
Interesting. My morals don't really roll that way.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I get that is what you want to project. Good luck with that.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)Don't want to get caught doing unscrupulous things?
I have a detailed plan on how to not get caught doing immoral and unscrupulous things:
Don't do immoral and unscrupulous things.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Well done for a second time.
<- That's not mad.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)Sorry...I thought you were worked up about the emails.
Then I saw the smiley face.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I decided to go the picture book route.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)I guess your behavior is not surprising.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)But emails clearly targeting Sanders for his religion and stuff prove nothing.
Alrighty then!
No bias there.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)The actual primary.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)The schedule was set long before, as were the debates. And they added more when he asked!
What specifically was done to hinder him? Without any evidence, these cries are petty whining.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)Me...or your lyin' eyes?".
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)During the primary there were voters for Hillary who were anti-Sanders. And there were voters for Sanders who were anti-Hillary. Some, in both parties were "NOT THIS PERSON EVER!" Meaning, they voted for Sanders because they did not want Hillary, period and vice versa. And we had plenty of threads here with people saying just that. "I will never vote for Hillary/Sanders if they're chosen." The e-mails, however, don't prove that those who wrote them were "I will never vote for Sanders" sorts. We would need evidence that the authors actually went out and committed some kind of sabotage (or arranged for such) to prove there is more to these emails than speculation on how Bernie could lose votes--or even on how to make Bernie lose votes.
All we have in front of us is evidence of these particular "Sanders supporters" bias against Hillary. And so that's all we can really say: "These supporters were always anti-Hillary...not pro-Democrat, possibly not even pro-Sanders." So, yes, they are anti-Hillary...and possibly never were pro-Sanders. Just pro-anyone-but-Hillary.
But I agree that the way this was originally stated, implying that a large number of Sanders supporters were anti-Hillary, is bias. I don't believe a large number of either candidates supporters were anti-the-other-candidate that much. And I suspect that many of these "Sanders or bust" folk are shills for the GOP. Their aim is to make Sanders supporters hate Hillary and the DNC enough not to either not vote, or vote for Trump. The reveal of those e-mails is trying to do just the same. To maintain the "unfair" controversy so that Hillary doesn't get those supporters or votes and Trump has a better chance at winning.
We're doing exactly what they want us to do when we say, "Supporters of this candidate only wanted him because they hated our candidate!" and "Your side has been trying to sabotage ours!" That keeps us harping at each other over past hurts rather than focusing on how to win. We really need to stop this. However hurt we are by any real or perceived unfairness or bias, the fact is that if the Democratic party wins, everyone involved with it wins. And if Trump wins, we all lose.
Blue Idaho
(5,057 posts)Never underestimate the opposition. I would not be the least bit surprised if some of the most vocally nasty anti-Clinton/Kane protestors are paid political operatives trying to ratfuck our convention. Hell, anyone can put in a Sanders T-Shirt.
Remember the "Brooks Brothers Riots?"
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)since I read about the chants. I think you're right...that a lot of protesters are. The thing that's disheartening here, is that they're delegates.
Blue Idaho
(5,057 posts)The protestors and marchers outside the conventions could easily be paid operatives. It would be nice to believe that everyone's motives are obvious and and their honesty unquestioned but that isn't the case 100% of the time.
Imagine you are the Republican Party and you are suddenly stuck with a turd for a candidate. How are you going to win with a complete shithead like the Donald at the helm? You are going to do anything and everything possible. Legal or not. Republicans are notorious for Political stunts.
I'm sure their best ratfuckers are walking around Philly right now with lots of "walking around money" in their pockets.
We should stop blaming each other and start looking at who's really pissing on our campfire.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)identify them not as ratfuckers but as the people they are posing as. 'Look, look, it's one of those awful people doing an awful thing' is the part of the closer and these days that's often done online.
Blue Idaho
(5,057 posts)Republicans have been honing these skills since at least the days of Lee Atwater.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)K and R
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)LostOne4Ever
(9,290 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#00009d]One of the big reasons, though not the only one, that I supported Sanders was because he was trying to bring change from WITHIN the democratic party. A part of that means supporting the Democratic nominee.
Whatever else can be said, he has abided by that and I look forward to his speech when I get home. He knows it is not just about him, and that by working together more can be done to advance liberal ideals than otherwise.
It is going to be a beautiful contrast to Ted Cruz and the republican party.
#strongertogether [/font]
rickford66
(5,528 posts)Hillary should take note.
bullwinkle428
(20,631 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
Tatiana
(14,167 posts)He really cares about the direction of this country. He ran as a Democrat to prevent a Nader-like situation from taking place. He worked from within the system to make it better and more responsive to the people (including party members like myself).
DWS, on the other hand, has openly worked to elect Republicans in Florida because they were her supposed "friends."
This is karma. I hope DWS is done in politics. Maybe the Clintons can secure her a cushy lobbyist job, since she's so good at fundraising.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Up until now, more trouble to get rid of her than to keep her.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)that is not Bernie Sanders
FailureToCommunicate
(14,025 posts)enough with the divisiveness.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)That is a shock!
onecaliberal
(32,916 posts)He's also done more for people that she every thought of. She busy protecting pay day lenders who are fucking over the poor
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)At this point they are not his suporters.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Qutzupalotl
(14,334 posts)The ego thing was the most off-base attack I've seen on him this cycle. He almost never says "I" it was always "this campaign." It was never about the person taking office, it was about getting better policies in place. I'd say he was fairly successful under the circumstances.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)But, noody else would do it. So he did/
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)But geez, I so hope you are right. Tonight will tell.
Peachhead22
(1,078 posts)ROFL, man I wish I would have thought of that!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)We aren't supposed to obey a leader. They are supposed to obey US.
Euphoria
(448 posts)John Poet
(2,510 posts)and it looks like maybe she will.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)helping her and "putting his own ego aside"? Making Democrats look bad just before an election is not helping and is not putting your own ego aside.