Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,884 posts)
Sat Jul 30, 2016, 12:12 AM Jul 2016

Cornell West said tonight that he might ditch Jill Stein (VIDEO)

At the end of this video, Bill Maher pins West down and gets him to concede that, if Stein is too far behind and he is faced of a choice between Trupm and Clinton, he will vote strategically against fascism.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
4. That would be a massive increase over their previous numbers
Sat Jul 30, 2016, 12:33 AM
Jul 2016

In 2012, Jill Stein received 0.36% of the vote (about a third of one percent), with her name appearing on 83% of ballots across the nation.

I'd say, she might be able to get up to 1.2%, given the BoB surge, thereby quadrupling her previous performance. Which would be yuuuuuge!!

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
5. I think Nader got almost 3 percent back in the day
Sat Jul 30, 2016, 12:37 AM
Jul 2016

Enough to make a significant difference with drastic consequences.

Chitown Kev

(2,197 posts)
6. LOL, OK, basically Brother Cornel said that he would vote for Hillary Clinton
Sat Jul 30, 2016, 12:47 AM
Jul 2016

nut...my gawd, all of THAT to get to that....

Grown2Hate

(2,012 posts)
7. I openly cheered. I LOVE Cornell West's optimism, I love his stances, I HATE his tactics
Sat Jul 30, 2016, 02:34 AM
Jul 2016

and his willingness to support Jill Stein (anti-vaccer, which, in a vacuum, by itself would not ever allow me to vote for her), but when he said he'd vote for Clinton [when it's clear, towards the end of the race, that Jill Stein has no shot (which, really could be RIGHT NOW)], I still considered this a win.

Granted, I don't like that he's supporting a spoiler candidate with zero chance to win (and with STATED goals of electing Trump in order to stop him) to begin with, I'll still take the victory.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
8. Who cares?
Sat Jul 30, 2016, 07:52 AM
Jul 2016

We don't want his support. As Bernie can tell you, it does more harm than good. Some "supporters" are useful as enemies.

Clowns should be laughed at.

Who
The
Hell
Cares
About
Cornell
West?

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
9. West is making a very good and logical deduction.
Sat Jul 30, 2016, 08:00 AM
Jul 2016


This is what a person who evaluates the problem and solves it in the best manner does.
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
10. Ha! Except that most of us reached this conclusion years ago, not some vague point in the future.
Sat Jul 30, 2016, 08:03 AM
Jul 2016

"Logical?"
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font][hr]

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Cornell West said tonight...