Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:58 AM Nov 2012

PPP's Tom Jensen: Republican polling analysts are 'morons'

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/11/polls-in-the-end-ended-up-making-sense.html

And the polling outfit that had as good a performance as any was one that may have sparked even more pre-election conservative ire than Silver. Public Policy Polling, a small polling firm in North Carolina, conducted a whopping 255 public polls in 2012, and it often seemed like polling skeptics (and even other pollsters) had a bone to pick with each one. This was partly because PPP uses automated dialers. It was also because PPP is a Democratic polling firm. But when the results came in, PPP’s polls had called all 50 states correctly in the presidential race (assuming Florida ultimately goes to Obama), every Senate race, and every important ballot initiative. Its private polling — like the 23 surveys it did of Kentucky legislative races for one client — was similarly on the mark.

When I talked to Tom Jensen, PPP’s director, this morning, he was understandably in the mood to gloat. “These supposed polling experts on the conservative side are morons,” Jensen crowed. “Jay Cost” — the Weekly Standard’s polling expert who’d waged a number-crunching war against PPP — “is an idiot.”


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
4. Gallup needs to start over. For the last couple of elections, they have become really unreliable.
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 12:36 PM
Nov 2012

They tend to come in a little closer at the end but that in itself is very suspicious. How can they be so far off a week out from the election day results. Polls just don't move that quickly.

And it appears that the problem is with their likely voter model. If they scrapped it and just used registered voters they likely would have a much better result with less volatility.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»PPP's Tom Jensen: Republ...