Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Oct 1, 2016, 03:29 PM Oct 2016

‘Apples to apples’: Advocate claims Trump calling woman the ‘c-word’ is like Hillary’s ‘deplorables’

TOM BOGGIONI
01 OCT 2016 AT 11:40 ET

An advocate for GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump spent her time on MSNBC Saturday morning attempting to spin the avalanche of misogyny that pours out of Donald Trump’s mouth with Hillary Clinton more polished comments, calling them “apples to apples” Along the way, she said Trump calling a reporter the “c-word” was no different than Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” comment.

Appearing on AM Joy, Latinas for Trump founder Ileana Garcia seemed ill -prepared to discuss Trump’s ongoing problems with both women and the Latino community and attempted to dismiss the ongoing controversy overt the fat- and slut-shaming of former Miss Universe Alicia Machado.

Explaining that she is more interested in economic issues, Garcia said, “I try to cut through the fat and go straight to it, he’s obviously a very transparent person. He has vulnerable moments, he’s not the most politically correct person. It’s not that I’m justifying him, I’m explaining to you how I feel as I watch it.”

Host Reid brought her back to Trump talking about women, asking her if she was a parent and if she “felt comfortable” with Trump comments about women.

-snip-

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/apples-to-apples-advocate-claims-trump-calling-woman-the-c-word-is-like-hillarys-deplorables/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
‘Apples to apples’: Advocate claims Trump calling woman the ‘c-word’ is like Hillary’s ‘deplorables’ (Original Post) DonViejo Oct 2016 OP
The "funny" thing about this is that she's just proving Hillary's point. Curtland1015 Oct 2016 #1
Obviously it's not the same if you have to refer to it as "the c word" meadowlark5 Oct 2016 #2
Seriously. It's that simple. uppityperson Oct 2016 #3
You've given us the perfect response to this ridiculous statement! displacedtexan Oct 2016 #7
No. So pitiful to read about surrogates having to try to defend Donald J. tRump, and flailing. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2016 #4
I wonder what her JPR username is. nt msanthrope Oct 2016 #5
cyberpj? grossproffit Oct 2016 #10
As a man I find the use of the c-word offensive and derogatory liberal N proud Oct 2016 #6
If Garcia can't see the difference between objectifying women & denigrating them solely for their Bill USA Oct 2016 #8
She had a very sly ploy - kept saying Justice Oct 2016 #9
Couldn't be 'apples to apples.' 'Deplorable' is too kind. Mamajami Oct 2016 #11

Curtland1015

(4,404 posts)
1. The "funny" thing about this is that she's just proving Hillary's point.
Sat Oct 1, 2016, 03:33 PM
Oct 2016

Just another deplorable person rooting for Trump.

meadowlark5

(2,795 posts)
2. Obviously it's not the same if you have to refer to it as "the c word"
Sat Oct 1, 2016, 03:35 PM
Oct 2016

I don't hear anyone referring to deplorables as "the d word".

displacedtexan

(15,696 posts)
7. You've given us the perfect response to this ridiculous statement!
Sat Oct 1, 2016, 04:15 PM
Oct 2016

Thanks for your astute observation! I hope you tweet this to high heaven!

You rock!

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
6. As a man I find the use of the c-word offensive and derogatory
Sat Oct 1, 2016, 03:42 PM
Oct 2016

Deplorable is an opinion whereas the c-word is not!

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
8. If Garcia can't see the difference between objectifying women & denigrating them solely for their
Sat Oct 1, 2016, 04:35 PM
Oct 2016

gender -- from making a judgement call as to Trump's followers attitudes, beliefs and behaviors (things held to be the result of decisions people make) -- as not being defensible, she is apparently not aware of the whole concept of being responsible for your behavior and beliefs and that some behaviors and beliefs, such as racism and sexism, are properly considered reprehensible and inconsistent with the founding principles of this nation. One would hope that someone running for the President of this country would not espouse or condone racism or sexism.




Justice

(7,185 posts)
9. She had a very sly ploy - kept saying
Sat Oct 1, 2016, 04:40 PM
Oct 2016

I'm being selfish and just thinking what policies will be better for me. Not focused on what stuff they say.

Joe Conason said you should read the taxes plans because his is not better for you. Then she got a little feistier but could not explain why policies better better.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»‘Apples to apples’: Advoc...