2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum‘Apples to apples’: Advocate claims Trump calling woman the ‘c-word’ is like Hillary’s ‘deplorables’
TOM BOGGIONI
01 OCT 2016 AT 11:40 ET
An advocate for GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump spent her time on MSNBC Saturday morning attempting to spin the avalanche of misogyny that pours out of Donald Trumps mouth with Hillary Clinton more polished comments, calling them apples to apples Along the way, she said Trump calling a reporter the c-word was no different than Clintons basket of deplorables comment.
Appearing on AM Joy, Latinas for Trump founder Ileana Garcia seemed ill -prepared to discuss Trumps ongoing problems with both women and the Latino community and attempted to dismiss the ongoing controversy overt the fat- and slut-shaming of former Miss Universe Alicia Machado.
Explaining that she is more interested in economic issues, Garcia said, I try to cut through the fat and go straight to it, hes obviously a very transparent person. He has vulnerable moments, hes not the most politically correct person. Its not that Im justifying him, Im explaining to you how I feel as I watch it.
Host Reid brought her back to Trump talking about women, asking her if she was a parent and if she felt comfortable with Trump comments about women.
-snip-
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/apples-to-apples-advocate-claims-trump-calling-woman-the-c-word-is-like-hillarys-deplorables/
Curtland1015
(4,404 posts)Just another deplorable person rooting for Trump.
meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)I don't hear anyone referring to deplorables as "the d word".
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)Thanks for your astute observation! I hope you tweet this to high heaven!
You rock!
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,000 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Deplorable is an opinion whereas the c-word is not!
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)gender -- from making a judgement call as to Trump's followers attitudes, beliefs and behaviors (things held to be the result of decisions people make) -- as not being defensible, she is apparently not aware of the whole concept of being responsible for your behavior and beliefs and that some behaviors and beliefs, such as racism and sexism, are properly considered reprehensible and inconsistent with the founding principles of this nation. One would hope that someone running for the President of this country would not espouse or condone racism or sexism.
Justice
(7,185 posts)I'm being selfish and just thinking what policies will be better for me. Not focused on what stuff they say.
Joe Conason said you should read the taxes plans because his is not better for you. Then she got a little feistier but could not explain why policies better better.