Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 02:16 PM Nov 2012

How Democrats learned to stop worrying and love filibuster reform


Earlier this week, Sen. Harry Reid was calling for its reform. Now, Democrats are coming around. Here's why

BY ALEX SEITZ-WALD


How far we’ve come. This week, the White House endorsed reforming the filibuster and no one batted an eyelash. Of course the president supported filibuster reform, the entire Democratic establishment was already on board!

But just two years ago, senior Democrats were saying things like this: “I’m totally opposed to the idea of changing the filibuster rules. I think that’s foolish.” And: “I’m so vehemently opposed to the ideas to fundamentally change the rules of the Senate.” That was Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd, who really hated the filibuster, but there were others.

“I think as torturous as this place can be, the cloture rule and the filibuster is important to protect the rights of the minority… My inclination is no,” Arkansas Democrat Mark Pryor told The Hill’s Alexander Bolton when asked about reform in 2010.

“I think we should retain the same policies that we have instead of lowering it… I think it has been working,” added Hawaii Democrat Daniel Akaka.

complete article:
http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/how_democrats_learned_to_stop_worrying_and_love_filibuster_reform/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

patrice

(47,992 posts)
1. Won't ending the week-long delay of going into Conference Committee alone REVEAL some of
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 02:37 PM
Nov 2012

the hidden doors into secret back-rooms where PRIVATE deals are done before the House-Senate committee takes a bill up? It seems like that delay would have been very instrumental in some folks getting their ducks all in a row before the people (Ha!) get a crack at what's on the table.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
2. And actually speaking for the duration of a filibuster could be VERY instructive to the public...
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 02:40 PM
Nov 2012

at large.

I look forward to this great educational opportunity!

Filibuster Harry

(666 posts)
4. If the Rs are going to filibuster 100 + times in 2013 I want to see them stand and
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 04:16 PM
Nov 2012

talk, and talk, and talk. You want to obstruct go and earn it boys.
Mitch, " we are going to make him a 1 term president" is now complaining and crying. God works in mysterious ways and this time he is on OUR side.

musiclawyer

(2,335 posts)
5. Article is behind a pay wall
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 08:40 PM
Nov 2012

So I don't know why they have come around according to the author. But the reason should be obvious. A broken senate means blame is displaced evenly. A reformed filibuster or nuked filibuster (what I want) totally exposes the GOP for what it is. Obstructionist. You get the Dem Senate to pass good laws and see the house stop everything, guess who gets the blame ?
The key is getting things passed. Grinding gridlock assures no Dem house in '14.
On the other hand when people see a functioning Senate followed by an obstructionist GOP house, my money is on a House flip in '14.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How Democrats learned to ...