Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Looks like the Comey sucker punch failed 538 shows 70+% is the bottom for Clinton (Original Post) Monk06 Nov 2016 OP
That wasn't a sucker punch, it was trolling America. Coyotl Nov 2016 #1
What makes you think it's the bottom? n/m ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2016 #5
70% likelihood is equal to 4.5 point favorite in football Awsi Dooger Nov 2016 #6
It was 69% today obamanut2012 Nov 2016 #7
PredictWise has it 84-16 trof Nov 2016 #8
Hope so budkin Nov 2016 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2016 #10
The sucker punch worked like a charm. Clinton was on track for a 10 point win. StevieM Nov 2016 #14
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
6. 70% likelihood is equal to 4.5 point favorite in football
Wed Nov 2, 2016, 01:10 PM
Nov 2016

Last edited Wed Nov 2, 2016, 02:34 PM - Edit history (1)

Prior to Comey, Nate Silver had Hilllary at 81%.

That 81% is the equivalent of a 9.5 point favorite in an NFL game. I am incorporating money line (straight up) relationship to the pointspread, based on charts and my 30+ years of experience.

So it's absurd to pretend there hasn't been a dramatic shift. If the odds plummeted on an NFL game from -9.5 to -4.5 in a few days, everybody in the wagering community would be scrambling to understand what happened. Or it could be very obvious. An injury to an elite quarterback replaced by a shaky backup could be worth 5 points adjustment in the spread, although normally it would be less than that.

On edit: Here is that NFL money line chart. It's a bit different than the one I use, but close enough after a quick online search. You'll notice that an edge of slightly above 4/1 (81%) equates to 9.5 point favoritism. Slightly above 3/1 (76%), which is where Nate moved the race after early Comey news drops matters to 7.5 point favoritism. Now the drop to 70%, which is slightly above 2/1, drops further. This is hardly linear. Losing 5 or 6% in a lower range is more significant. In my chart 70% is tight to 4.5 point favoritism. In the linked version it's closer to 5 point favoritism. I'll accept that. I researched win probability based on pointspread decades ago and came up with a homemade chart. Other versions may vary somewhat, but not significantly.

http://www.sportility.net/nfl/moneyline_points.html

There is juice on both sides. For a man to man price, which is what we're interested in, split the difference. For example, at -470 (470 to win 100) and +375 (100 to win 375) at 9.5 point favoritism, the no-juice middle would be slightly above 4/1 theoretical edge, which aligns with that 81% from Nate's site pre-Comey.

Response to Monk06 (Original post)

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
14. The sucker punch worked like a charm. Clinton was on track for a 10 point win.
Wed Nov 2, 2016, 02:08 PM
Nov 2016

Comey and Chaffetz have successfully deceived the public with their violation of the Hatch Act.

I thought we had a chance of taking the House back. Now that is over. And the Senate will be close.

Hillary will still win, just not by as wide of a margin.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Looks like the Comey suck...