Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Targetsmart? (Original Post) cilla4progress Nov 2016 OP
Here is some information about how the poll was conducted: femmocrat Nov 2016 #1
Is 311 a statistically sufficient cilla4progress Nov 2016 #3
Here is a DU post about it: femmocrat Nov 2016 #4
I watched him on the O'Donnell show and he seemed very creditable. shraby Nov 2016 #2

cilla4progress

(24,736 posts)
3. Is 311 a statistically sufficient
Wed Nov 2, 2016, 01:45 PM
Nov 2016

poll size? Clearly, they think so. Not finding pollster ratings easily...

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
4. Here is a DU post about it:
Wed Nov 2, 2016, 06:50 PM
Nov 2016

I couldn't find it on 538's rating list of pollsters. That sample size does seem small, especially since they said they contacted actual voters. Don't know.


***Details on TargetSmart/ William and Mary poll of Florida***

https://www.scribd.com/document/329698329/TargetSmart-William-Mary-Florida-Poll-of-Early-and-Likely-Voters

Looks like a pretty good poll to me. Sample size is less than desirable.

Review of findings
HRC leads in early vote 55-38
28% republicans crossing over to vote for HRC in early vote
Predicted final vote HRC 48 DT 40


http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512574860

shraby

(21,946 posts)
2. I watched him on the O'Donnell show and he seemed very creditable.
Wed Nov 2, 2016, 01:42 PM
Nov 2016

He explained how they got the results and the upshot is without Florida, the donald is toast.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Targetsmart?