Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Democrats Ascendant

(601 posts) Sun Nov 6, 2016, 10:38 AM Nov 2016

Bill Weld

Wondering if Hillary will give him some sort of position, and how dems would react to that. He's been very complimentary to her.... Thoughts?

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bill Weld (Original Post) Democrats Ascendant Nov 2016 OP

He seems like a great guy. LisaL Nov 2016 #1

The best thing he can do this last couple of days is resign from Johnson's ticket book_worm Nov 2016 #2

Yep, I think that would be a good move! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2016 #6

I've always thought of Bill Weld as one of the good guys. I know they seemed to RKP5637 Nov 2016 #5

LisaL

(44,974 posts)

1. He seems like a great guy.

Reply to Democrats Ascendant (Original post)

Sun Nov 6, 2016, 10:39 AM

Nov 2016

Of course libertarians aren't very happy with him right now.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)

2. The best thing he can do this last couple of days is resign from Johnson's ticket

Reply to Democrats Ascendant (Original post)

Sun Nov 6, 2016, 10:40 AM

Nov 2016

and formally endorse HRC.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)

6. Yep, I think that would be a good move! n/t

Reply to book_worm (Reply #2)

Sun Nov 6, 2016, 11:08 AM

Nov 2016

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)

5. I've always thought of Bill Weld as one of the good guys. I know they seemed to

Reply to Democrats Ascendant (Original post)

Sun Nov 6, 2016, 11:07 AM

Nov 2016

like him in Massachusetts, a democratic state. He reminds of the old time moderate republicans. Had some ideas and just wanted to get the job done so the majority of people might be happy with decisions by both parties.

Reply to this discussion