Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumChristie vs. Cuomo: Trickle-down vs. middle-out economics
Both 2016 presidential hopefuls fancy themselves populists, but only one supports raising minimum wage
BY RICHARD KIRSCH, NEXT NEW DEAL
Two potential candidates for president in 2016, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, have taken opposing positions on raising the minimum wage in their states. The debate between the two governors draws a sharp distinction between competing economic visions: trickle-down vs. middle-out economics. At the same time, it also shows how limited the current debate is when it comes to dealing with whats needed to meet the needs of working families and, in doing so, change the direction of economic policy.
In late January, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie vetoed a small increase in the minimum wage, from the current federal minimum of $7.25 an hour to $8.50 an hour. Christie said that raising the minimum wage would jeopardize New Jerseys economic progress. Christie based his opposition on concerns about small business, although two out of three low-wage workers are employed by corporations with over 100 employees.
Across the Hudson, New York Governor Cuomo argued just the opposite in his State of the State address. Cuomo made the economic case for how putting more money into peoples pockets by raising the minimum wage will move New Yorks economy forward:
Increasing the minimum wage leads to greater economic growth. Low-income individuals spend a larger percentage of their income than higher-income earners and salary increases in low wage occupations lead to increased demand for goods and services. Empirical evidence suggests that an increase of $1 in the minimum wage generates approximately $3,000 in household spending per year. Increased household spending will increase demand for goods and help businesses grow, thereby creating more jobs for New Yorkers.
more:
http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/christie_vs_cuomo_tickle_down_vs_middle_out_economics_partner/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 951 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Christie vs. Cuomo: Trickle-down vs. middle-out economics (Original Post)
DonViejo
Feb 2013
OP
Cuomo's ideas certainly make more sense than Christies...another stingy ReRhug.
Auntie Bush
Feb 2013
#2
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)1. History tells us
that it will be a win for Cuomo on this issue.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)2. Cuomo's ideas certainly make more sense than Christies...another stingy ReRhug.
I hope the vast majority can see and understand the reasoning behind Cuomo's beliefs.