2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRepublicans block a vote for no reason and the entire conservative media repeats an untrue smear
The increasingly ridiculous Hagel oppositionRepublicans block a vote for no reason and the entire conservative media repeats an untrue smear
BY ALEX PAREENE
Here it is, everyone, the absolute epitome of Lindsey Graham statements:
Sen Graham: "Unless there's some bombshell, I'd be prepared to move on" and vote for cloture on Hagel, after 10 days.
Todd Zwillich (@toddzwillich) February 14, 2013
Lindsey Graham on Hagel: "10 days from now I'll feel better about it."
Todd Zwillich (@toddzwillich) February 14, 2013
Sen. Graham and his best friend John McCain have been blocking the confirmation of Chuck Hagel as Defense secretary, because they want to know whether President Obama called the president of Libya the night of the Benghazi attack. While thats not a very good reason to filibuster a Cabinet nominee, it is at least a reason. The White House has complied, giving Graham and McCain what they want. Grahams response: Now he is just going to pointlessly delay the Hagel vote, because it will make him feel good. As always, with Lindsey Graham, being a senator is all about feelings.
While Lindsey Graham says he will have changed his mind on Hagels suitability in 10 days time, lots of other Hagel opponents are definitely not going to feel better, because they have all convinced themselves that Hagel is basically Americas Worst Anti-Semite. Here is some proof, from a guy who writes for the depressing website named after Andrew Breitbart:
On Thursday, Senate sources told Breitbart News exclusively that they have been informed that one of the reasons that President Barack Obamas nominee for Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, has not turned over requested documents on his sources of foreign funding is that one of the names listed is a group purportedly called Friends of Hamas.
more
http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_increasingly_ridiculous_hagel_opposition/
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)right after the vote scolding anyone who referred to it as a 'filibuster'.
So...*filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster* *filibuster*
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)sound bombshell-y. Or take any random utterance, or any group he's ever belonged to or gotten paid by, and make it bombshellish. Basically, anything having to do with Israel (or substitute words for Israel: Iran, Hamas, etc.).
pscot
(21,024 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)One way or another. It is clear now they had no particular reason, they are just being vindictive because they are pissed at Hagel because he supported Obama in 2008 and was critical of how Bush was running the Iraq war. Benghazi had zero to do with it.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)IF they say "no" to the ultra-conservative Chuck Hagel, maybe we'll get a real Democrat in there instead? Wesley Clark?