Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 02:36 AM Sep 2013

CA Legislature Approves Dangerous Bill to End All Federal Testing of State E-Voting Systems


A new bill that would grant unprecedented and unchecked powers to the California Sec. of State --- including those that could allow him or her to approve new e-voting systems for use in actual elections with no testing at all --- was approved late last week by the state legislature along partisan lines. It is now on its way to Gov. Jerry Brown (D) for his signature or his veto.


he Governor should veto SB 360, a sweeping, dangerous, ill-conceived and dishonestly presented piece of legislation, passed with little debate in public or in either chamber of the state legislature.


Sponsored by 2014 Sec. of State candidate, measure grants unprecedented power to Sec. of State to approve new e-voting systems for use in real elections, even with no testing at all

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10256
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CA Legislature Approves Dangerous Bill to End All Federal Testing of State E-Voting Systems (Original Post) UCmeNdc Sep 2013 OP
OTOH do we want NSA testing the machines? Downwinder Sep 2013 #1
Has Federal Testing made e-voting systems Downwinder Sep 2013 #2
Yes. BradBlog Sep 2013 #3
Has it been the Government that found security holes or institutions Downwinder Sep 2013 #4
Both and neither BradBlog Sep 2013 #5
i would be more inclined to trust Academic testing Downwinder Sep 2013 #6

BradBlog

(2,938 posts)
3. Yes.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 07:31 PM
Sep 2013

"More secure or reliable" than it would have been without it? Yes, absolutely.

As to "honest", without the ability for citizens to oversee their own results, any speculation about "honesty" is meaningless.

BradBlog

(2,938 posts)
5. Both and neither
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:54 AM
Sep 2013

Most of the testing at the federal level has historically bee jobbed out to third parties (usually corporate, as opposed to academic institutions). But those processes have been overseen by government entities. More so now than previously.

ALL of those various levels have discovered security issues along the way. As I said in my initial coverage of the terrible SB 360, more testing is better than less testing. Getting rid if an entire layer if independent testing is madness, particularly given how many massive security issues have still managed to get through to systems actually used in live elections even WITH the two levels of testing and certification (at both federal and state levels) that currently exist for CA systems, but won't anymore as if Jan 1, 2014, if Jerry Brown signs this ill-considered piece of legislation.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
6. i would be more inclined to trust Academic testing
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 03:53 AM
Sep 2013

than Corporate or Government. Let CAL Tech, USC, UCLA, Oxy, and Harvey Mudd certify the system, I would be satisfied.

They are talking about wireless hot spots at all of the polling stations here.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»CA Legislature Approves D...