Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 11:12 PM Nov 2013

Warren vs. Clinton in 2016? Don't buy it

By David Rothkopf
November 13, 2013

(CNN) -- Speculation among political "analysts" has recently heated up around the idea that newly minted Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts might pose a real challenge to Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination.

Never mind that Warren has zero executive experience, has been in Washington for the blink of an eye and has spent much of her life as an academic -- because of course, that's a formula that seems to have worked for the current occupant of the Oval Office (if not, as at least half the rabid commenters beneath this column will also argue, for the country.)

Never mind that she has expressed no interest in the job. Never mind that the election of 2016 is three full years away and that almost anything can happen in that time including, according to a recent study in the journal Nature, many more asteroid strikes than we originally believed possible.

Facts and sound reasoning be damned. Birds gotta fly and pundits gotta pundit. So off we go.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/13/opinion/rothkopf-warren-clinton/index.html

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren vs. Clinton in 2016? Don't buy it (Original Post) Beacool Nov 2013 OP
Similar Facts Didn't Seem To Slow Obama Down cantbeserious Nov 2013 #1
Obama at least had been a state senator for some years. Beacool Nov 2013 #4
Warren 2016 cantbeserious Nov 2013 #14
You should brush up on Obama's history Tx4obama Nov 2013 #6
Warren For President 2016 cantbeserious Nov 2013 #13
A very good point davidpdx Nov 2013 #15
The Left that keeps complaining about Hillary being too centrist would go for Cuomo? Beacool Nov 2013 #16
No, I'm not davidpdx Nov 2013 #17
There will be other people running. Beacool Nov 2013 #18
I'd be shocked if Warren ran davidpdx Nov 2013 #32
I wouldn't blame anyone for not wanting to run. Beacool Nov 2013 #33
Yep, the adage "be careful of what you wish for" applies davidpdx Nov 2013 #34
I assume that they'll go there for the holidays. Beacool Nov 2013 #35
Ok Ms Bea--you and I know that HRC eats controversy for breakfast Always Randy Nov 2013 #40
I think that it would be tough on anyone. Beacool Nov 2013 #42
Do you REALLY think she can run the path? Cosmocat Nov 2013 #36
I don't have a whole lot of love for Clinton Warpy Nov 2013 #2
Other than staying in the Senate where she could be a liberal voice similar to Ted Kennedy's, Beacool Nov 2013 #3
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Warpy Nov 2013 #11
i'm gonna have to follow you around with a blood pressure monitor and emergency bankies for all dionysus Nov 2013 #5
Well, I'm as much of a fighter as the lady in my avatar. Beacool Nov 2013 #8
"I am not running for president in four years. I am not running for president in 2008" - Obama NoOneMan Nov 2013 #7
wasn't David Rothkopf a former official in the Clinton Admin? Whisp Nov 2013 #9
All this publicity is giving her increased power in her current landmark position and it's great. libdem4life Nov 2013 #10
It wasn't Fred Astaire who said it. Beacool Nov 2013 #12
I tried to look it up...thanks. libdem4life Nov 2013 #22
The quote has been attributed to several people. Beacool Nov 2013 #23
Thanks, again. Sometimes I get a bit "carried away"...a unabashed political junkie. Still sad that libdem4life Nov 2013 #25
Yes, it is sad. Beacool Nov 2013 #26
and the SCOTUS. Justice Warren has a ring to it. libdem4life Nov 2013 #29
I never thought of her in the SCOTUS. Beacool Nov 2013 #30
Who would have thought President a few months ago? Looked at her bio...her specialty was Bankruptcy libdem4life Nov 2013 #31
This just shows the Clintons really Are worried about Warren. Whisp Nov 2013 #19
Try writing fiction, you have a wild imagination. Beacool Nov 2013 #20
Meh. It's just a crap article. HappyMe Nov 2013 #21
No one has said that there wouldn't be other people in the running. Beacool Nov 2013 #24
but lots have said if Hillary runs, it's hers. Whisp Nov 2013 #39
imo it'll come down to Warren... polichick Nov 2013 #27
Well then I'll just have to find somebody else to vote for in the primary tularetom Nov 2013 #28
You want the smart solution? Rosco T. Nov 2013 #37
The vice presidency is a hardly a stepping stone to the presidency TheKentuckian Nov 2013 #38
The 1% dreams of getting rid of Warren...first paragraph nails it. libdem4life Nov 2013 #41

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
6. You should brush up on Obama's history
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 12:05 AM
Nov 2013

Warren has no foreign policy experience and she is currently NOT loading up her resume` for a run in 2016.


Compare Warren's committees to those of Obama when he was in the U.S. Senate...

Senator Warren's committees: Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, Special Committee on Aging
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_warren#Committee_assignments



Senator Obama's committees
Obama held assignments on the Senate Committees for Foreign Relations, Environment and Public Works and Veterans' Affairs through December 2006.[89] In January 2007, he left the Environment and Public Works committee and took additional assignments with Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. He also became Chairman of the Senate's subcommittee on European Affairs. As a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Obama made official trips to Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia and Africa. He met with Mahmoud Abbas before Abbas became President of the Palestinian National Authority, and gave a speech at the University of Nairobi in which he condemned corruption within the Kenyan government.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama#Committees



And don't forget that Obama was Illinois State Senator for eight years: January 8, 1997 – November 4, 2004

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
15. A very good point
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 08:50 AM
Nov 2013

I highly doubt that Warren will run and I don't think Biden will either. With the exception of Hilary Clinton, we are going to have to recruit candidates.

The one person who I wish was a bit younger is John Kitzhaber, our governor in Oregon.

Some have mentioned Martin O'Malley. Andrew Cuomuo would be another possiblity.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
16. The Left that keeps complaining about Hillary being too centrist would go for Cuomo?
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 10:15 AM
Nov 2013

You must not be familiar with his record.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
17. No, I'm not
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 10:25 AM
Nov 2013

I'm merely throwing names out. In my opinion having names throw around as alternative is just thinking about it. I'm simply looking for other alternatives whether it be present or past governors, Congressman, etc.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
18. There will be other people running.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 10:32 AM
Nov 2013

It's too soon for them to announce, but I honestly don't think that one of them will be Liz Warren. The presidency may come with lots of perks and it sure is an ego booster, but it's mostly a very tough and thankless job. I wonder if Obama really knew what he was about to encounter when he ran in 2008. I know that Hillary was fully aware of the difficulties of the job having already been in the WH with Bill, but I think that most politicians underestimate the crap that they are going to have to go through. Warren may just not be interested in going through that process. She may be perfectly content with being a warrior for the middle class from her Senate perch.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
32. I'd be shocked if Warren ran
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 04:46 PM
Nov 2013

In fact, I think we are going to be shocked over a few people who decide it's not their cup of tea. Like you said, who can blame them.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
34. Yep, the adage "be careful of what you wish for" applies
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 04:59 PM
Nov 2013

It was 5 years ago this month he was first elected. After the next inauguration I'm sure he'll be headed to Hawaii for a vacation.

Always Randy

(1,059 posts)
40. Ok Ms Bea--you and I know that HRC eats controversy for breakfast
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 10:28 PM
Nov 2013

the more crap they throw at her the more energized she becomes-----I do think it is wearing on Obama ----because the biggest part of his opposition is racist ---HRC has been hated by them forever---I really do think they are in for a good ol ass whoopin from HRC----Obama seems to think he must be reserved------I really hope he gets a congress to back him for his last two years----

Cosmocat

(14,566 posts)
36. Do you REALLY think she can run the path?
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 05:38 PM
Nov 2013

Rs and the "liberal media" have spent 8 years ravaging Barrack Obama, and they WILL have him framed in a VERY negative manner by the time the next election comes around.

Do you really think comparing her to him relative to experience when he is going to be framed a weak and ineffectual leader is going to get her elected in 2016?

And, I like Barrack Obama and I don't view him that way personally.

But, that is absolutely what more than 50% of this country is going to think.

Warpy

(111,276 posts)
2. I don't have a whole lot of love for Clinton
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 11:28 PM
Nov 2013

but that would change should she pledge to put either Elizabet Warren or Eliot Spitzer into the AG spot.

I will vote for whatever stiff the party presents me with, of course. I just hope there are more possibilities than Clinton by early 2016.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
3. Other than staying in the Senate where she could be a liberal voice similar to Ted Kennedy's,
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 11:31 PM
Nov 2013

wouldn't a better job be Secretary of the Treasury. She's an economist after all.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
5. i'm gonna have to follow you around with a blood pressure monitor and emergency bankies for all
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 12:00 AM
Nov 2013

the shit you're gonna get on DU for the next three years!

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
8. Well, I'm as much of a fighter as the lady in my avatar.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 12:40 AM
Nov 2013

We fall down, shake ourselves off and keep going.........with the aid of a few bankies from friends.







 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
7. "I am not running for president in four years. I am not running for president in 2008" - Obama
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 12:29 AM
Nov 2013

Speculation even about who has no interest in a job is premature. In any case, don't take your eye off of 2014

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
9. wasn't David Rothkopf a former official in the Clinton Admin?
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 01:22 AM
Nov 2013

seems to ring a bell or two.

I think he might be one of the Oath Keepers so of course the Tone of this Tripe he wrote explains itself.

Nice try tho!
and weren't you one of those here that bellyached about talking about 2016 when it should be 2014 2014 2014
2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014
2014 2014 2014
2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 !!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Rothkopf

Prior to the establishment of Garten Rothkopf, Rothkopf was the chairman, CEO, and co-founder of Intellibridge Corporation, a leading provider of international analysis and open-source intelligence for the U.S. national security community and selected investors, financial organizations and other corporations. Before founding Intellibridge, Rothkopf was managing director of Kissinger Associates, the international advisory firm founded and chaired by former U.S. Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger. Immediately prior to joining Kissinger Associates, Rothkopf served as Acting U.S. Under Secretary of Commerce for International Trade. In this capacity, Rothkopf directed the 2400 employees of the International Trade Administration including the U.S. Commercial Service, the International Economic Policy Bureau, the Bureau of Import Administration, and the Bureau of Trade Development. He joined the Clinton Administration in 1993 as Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for International Trade Policy and Development.

---
sounds like a sweet little man with no agenda!

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
10. All this publicity is giving her increased power in her current landmark position and it's great.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 01:35 AM
Nov 2013

Each election cycle is different, 2008 was then, this is now.

Like Fred Astaire used to say, women have to do everything backwards and in heels...or something like that. Now we've got an embarrassment of riches...two winners !

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
12. It wasn't Fred Astaire who said it.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 02:13 AM
Nov 2013

This is the quote, "Ginger Rogers did everything Fred Astaire did, except backwards and in high heels".

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
23. The quote has been attributed to several people.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 12:13 PM
Nov 2013

The Ginger Rogers official website attributes the quote to Bob Thaves (he was a cartoonist). I remember that Ann Richards frequently liked to use that quote.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
25. Thanks, again. Sometimes I get a bit "carried away"...a unabashed political junkie. Still sad that
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 01:07 PM
Nov 2013

it's so currently descriptive.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
26. Yes, it is sad.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 01:36 PM
Nov 2013

Ann used that quote often because it describes what women have to go through, particularly in occupations that have been traditionally dominated by men. In politics we lag behind most industrialized nations. We've never had a woman president and we are still a small minority in the Senate and House.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
30. I never thought of her in the SCOTUS.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 02:29 PM
Nov 2013

She's an economist, would she even be interested in becoming a Justice?

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
31. Who would have thought President a few months ago? Looked at her bio...her specialty was Bankruptcy
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 03:38 PM
Nov 2013

Law. And certainly not in the near future. There are no intended retirements for the next 8 years, unless a Republican wins, so they say.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
19. This just shows the Clintons really Are worried about Warren.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 11:40 AM
Nov 2013

I mean, what an emotional, stupid hit piece.

I can hear it now. Bubba gets on the phone to David:

Hey, Davey bud, I need you to do something for me. remember how I bla bla bla for you when you were in that trouble in '94...
well I need a little favour. Can you write up some trash piece about Warren - she seems to be getting better press and chatter lately than my wife is. Try knocking her down a peg.

Yes, sir. Mr. President. Consider it done.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
21. Meh. It's just a crap article.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 11:47 AM
Nov 2013

I think the Clintons should be concerned about any primary candidates.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
24. No one has said that there wouldn't be other people in the running.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 12:20 PM
Nov 2013

This was written to counter the recent articles pushing Warren to run. Obviously not everyone is on the Hillary bandwagon, but not everyone is on the Warren bandwagon either.


polichick

(37,152 posts)
27. imo it'll come down to Warren...
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 01:46 PM
Nov 2013

either deciding the country needs her or that another leader will stand for the people against corporations and the 1%.

Rosco T.

(6,496 posts)
37. You want the smart solution?
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 06:02 PM
Nov 2013

Right now Warren is smart, sharp and concise. And a rookie in government. That's a simple fact, not a dig. But you can be dammed sure the GOP would use it against her..

Clinton/Warren 2016
Clinton/Warren 2020

Now with 8 years of SOLID EXPERIENCE

Warren/? (Schweizer?) 2024
Warren/? 2028

Unless having 24 years of Democrats in the white house just makes you unhappy

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
38. The vice presidency is a hardly a stepping stone to the presidency
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 02:34 PM
Nov 2013

All it could possibly do here is prevent Warren from having any actual power and instead making her a fig leaf for a politician ideologically aligned with the very same fuckers she is trying to oppose.

What you propose is making her a Palin style beard to sop up the energy from the base with some ethereal promise of supporting her in her, maybe down the line.

The vice presidency is the very place to stick someone difficult to make the irrelevant unless the actual President wants them to have juice, which makes them influential but still constitutionally powerless to move events.

Considering where Clinton is economically, Warren would be nothing more than decorative fly paper to attract dissatisfied voters and in the end sully here with being tied to all the shit neoliberal crap the Clinton love and preach.

Queue Admiral Ackbar on that, we need Warren in the Senate if she isn't going to have some power over policy in an administration not playing hood ornament for Clinton.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
41. The 1% dreams of getting rid of Warren...first paragraph nails it.
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 10:57 PM
Nov 2013

And so does the last paragraph. She's no hood ornament ... more like our strict mothers, or the nuns or our first grade teachers when they read us the riot act. Love it when she does it to the high and mighty banksters and to the entire Senate. She's good.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Warren vs. Clinton in 201...