Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 01:10 AM Feb 2014

Republicans Reject Effort To Vote On Judicial Nominees, So Harry Reid Moves Forward Anyway


Republicans Reject Effort To Vote On Judicial Nominees, So Harry Reid Moves Forward Anyway

WASHINGTON -- It appears Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has had it with Republicans refusing to let judicial nominees get votes. So he moved forward without them on Wednesday night.

Reid filed a so-called cloture motion that sets up votes on four federal district court nominees who have been waiting all year for action, but were stymied by Republican delays. The nominees include Jeffrey Meyer for the District of Connecticut, James Moody Jr. for the Eastern District of Arkansas, James Donato for the Northern District of California, and Beth Freeman for the Northern District of California.

The move marks the first time this year that Reid has taken it into his own hands to move on stalled judicial nominees. For weeks, he and other Democrats have tried to work out "unanimous consent" agreements to allow certain nominees to immediately get votes, but Republicans have refused. By filing a cloture motion, Reid can set up votes on the nominees without the consent of Republicans, though the process is more time-consuming. It appears the majority leader decided a lengthy confirmation process is better than no process at all.

Reid tried to get a unanimous consent agreement for Wednesday's nominees, but was rebuffed by Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who signaled that Republicans will keep gumming up the nominations process as payback for Democrats pushing through filibuster reform last year. Democrats revamped filibuster rules in response to GOP obstruction of many Obama nominees for political reasons.

-snip-

Full article here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/12/harry-reid-judicial-nominees_n_4776552.html



The U.S. Senate will return from break February 24th and will begin the debate/voting process: http://democrats.senate.gov/2014/02/24/senate-floor-schedule-for-monday-february-24-2014/#.UvxTSfsynZc

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans Reject Effort To Vote On Judicial Nominees, So Harry Reid Moves Forward Anyway (Original Post) Tx4obama Feb 2014 OP
Finally! Prophet 451 Feb 2014 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #2
Fuck the obstructionists davidpdx Feb 2014 #3
Does Cornyn realize how ridiculous he sounds when he says: okaawhatever Feb 2014 #4

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
1. Finally!
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 06:32 AM
Feb 2014

In the last five years, I've gone from thinking the filibuster was an important tool for giving the minority a voice to thinking they should have to stand up and talk like they di in the old days.

Response to Tx4obama (Original post)

okaawhatever

(9,462 posts)
4. Does Cornyn realize how ridiculous he sounds when he says:
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 05:14 PM
Feb 2014

Reid tried to get a unanimous consent agreement for Wednesday's nominees, but was rebuffed by Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who signaled that Republicans will keep gumming up the nominations process as payback for Democrats pushing through filibuster reform last year.


So basically, you are punishing them for changing the filibuster by doing what you were doing before they changed the filibuster?
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Republicans Reject Effort...