Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Okay, Warren's not running. Bernie might be. (Original Post) KamaAina Aug 2014 OP
I hope he does yeoman6987 Aug 2014 #1
Bernie is almost 100% running PAProgressive28 Aug 2014 #2
I hope he stays in.... marlakay Aug 2014 #14
As if what they say in the primaries has any bearing on what they do once they win. n/t JoeyT Aug 2014 #21
True but what else do we do? Give up? n/t marlakay Aug 2014 #45
No, but we should at least stop thinking that forcing a candidate to act Nay Aug 2014 #55
He's 'almost 100% running' and you direct us to ... Reddit? wyldwolf Aug 2014 #19
I must say VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #3
What's so funny? KamaAina Aug 2014 #4
If Dennis Kucinich is a non-starter VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #5
Robert Reich is a socialist? KamaAina Aug 2014 #8
I thought this was about Bernie Sanders? VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #11
No, mainly about Reich. KamaAina Aug 2014 #27
when did reich decide to run? VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #33
He hasn't. KamaAina Aug 2014 #38
intriguing is not the word I would use... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #42
care to back that up? mopinko Aug 2014 #10
back up what? That Dennis Kucinich is a non-starter? VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #12
no, that reich is a socialist. mopinko Aug 2014 #16
i was never talking about reich... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #34
oh and please provide data that shows VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #6
since he isnt a candidate yet, mopinko Aug 2014 #17
nor is he a Democrat.... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #35
mopinko, any thread that floats a Dem candidate besides Hillary will be pounced upon with gusto! djean111 Aug 2014 #51
first of all Bernie is not a Dem..... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #52
i'm personally quite fond of hillary. mopinko Aug 2014 #54
Explain how he wins a national election brooklynite Aug 2014 #7
i think his take on issues is straightforward and understandable. mopinko Aug 2014 #9
That may be so....but it doesn't mean you win elections.... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #13
there is no poll. mopinko Aug 2014 #40
there is for Hillary Clinton VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #41
He ran unsuccessfully for Mass governor. elleng Aug 2014 #15
And he lost to Shannon O'Brien KamaAina Aug 2014 #24
Right, she lost to rmoney! In MASS! elleng Aug 2014 #26
That's right, it was Mittwit. KamaAina Aug 2014 #28
He spent MILLIONS to get that job, to use as a launching pad for the Presidency. MADem Aug 2014 #30
What If He Becomes The Ralph Nader & Takes Enough Democrat Votes Away, WE LOSE! Corey_Baker08 Aug 2014 #18
He would presumably run as a Dem KamaAina Aug 2014 #25
uh no he wont.... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #36
that is what his stated intentions were. mopinko Aug 2014 #39
you know what's so funny about this thread so far? wyldwolf Aug 2014 #20
The OP was mainly about Reich. KamaAina Aug 2014 #23
Well - I think it would be a first in at least one aspect in Presidential races karynnj Aug 2014 #22
Draft Sherrod Brown Adenoid_Hynkel Aug 2014 #29
Doesn't want to run either... brooklynite Aug 2014 #44
Draft isn't a "want to" centric word and no one cares about your alleged contacts TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #46
Sorry, I'll stick to the real world... brooklynite Aug 2014 #47
Not being rich I don't get one on one time at fundraisers and also have to do crazy shit like TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #50
Too bad nobody's invented a way to mail a letter... brooklynite Aug 2014 #56
Too bad no know one has invented reading comprehension, it would have made such action discernable TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #59
Reich has no national following. MADem Aug 2014 #31
As much as I like Reich I agree with you davidpdx Aug 2014 #32
And ... Obama is tall, and he had friends in the Senate when he was first running. MADem Aug 2014 #37
I guess you are right. Cal33 Aug 2014 #49
Bernie? Good! Now we can be guaranteed to lose the presidency! savalez Aug 2014 #43
I hope both Warren and Sanders run bigwillq Aug 2014 #48
Sanders won't win, I suspect he realizes that, and it wouldn't necessarily be good if he did. Unvanguard Aug 2014 #53
Sanders wouldn't be in a primary against Hillary so it won't matter. We need a lib dem alternative. craigmatic Aug 2014 #57
He has stated that if he ran, it would be as a Dem KamaAina Aug 2014 #58
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
1. I hope he does
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 01:32 PM
Aug 2014

Not only does he have great beliefs on the issues, but it would take away the BS age issue from Hillary which is exceptional!

PAProgressive28

(270 posts)
2. Bernie is almost 100% running
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 02:02 PM
Aug 2014

The only way I don't see him jumping in is Warren running or a serious re-consideration.

If you want to join whatever Bernie 2016 movement may exist to this point come check us out on Reddit at r/SandersForPresident

Nay

(12,051 posts)
55. No, but we should at least stop thinking that forcing a candidate to act
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 01:28 PM
Aug 2014

and talk like a progressive in the primaries will actually result in a progressive taking office. The main problem with, say, forcing Hillary to fake-talk like a progressive in the primaries is that the run-of-the-mill voters who only half pay attention to politics every 4 years may get the erroneous idea that she IS interested in helping them when she truly has never shown much interest in doing so.

I hope Hillary presents herself as she has presented herself over the last 20 years. That way, Bernie Sanders can stand out as a true progressive and we can go on from there, having a clear choice of what we want, without the muddying of the waters with every candidate pretending he gives a damn about being progressive.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
5. If Dennis Kucinich is a non-starter
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 03:00 PM
Aug 2014

What does that say about an actual Socialists chances? That is whats so funny.....besides he is also unqualified to be supported at DU.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
8. Robert Reich is a socialist?
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 04:26 PM
Aug 2014

He's served in three administrations, one of them Republican (Ford). I'm pretty sure there's never been an "actual Socialist" in any administration.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
27. No, mainly about Reich.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 12:18 AM
Aug 2014

mopinko floated his name on FB, so I thought I'd run it up the flagpole here and see if anybody saluted.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
34. i was never talking about reich...
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 11:19 AM
Aug 2014

And who gives a rat about him besides you....he has less a chance than the very longshot Sanders has....

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
6. oh and please provide data that shows
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 03:03 PM
Aug 2014

More than a snowballs chance in hell. Where are the polls that show him beating any not to mention ALL republican comers?

mopinko

(70,198 posts)
17. since he isnt a candidate yet,
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 07:41 PM
Aug 2014

i dont think the "data", which is to say- proof of his name recognition, is out there.
but, you cant discuss this person unless you think he can win?
nobody is telling you to vote for him. the thread is about whether he should run.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
51. mopinko, any thread that floats a Dem candidate besides Hillary will be pounced upon with gusto!
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 12:08 PM
Aug 2014

In this case, you floated Reich's name, and Kucinich was attacked, for some reason, but you get the idea.
Has the making of a good drinking game.
And doesn't do Hillary any favors.

mopinko

(70,198 posts)
54. i'm personally quite fond of hillary.
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 01:20 PM
Aug 2014

the neo-con stink that people spray doesnt bother me. she didnt pass nafta. tho i wish she had voted the other way on the iwr, and is hawkish, that, i think just a feint. she has to look tough in order to win. and she is too smart to shoot herself in the foot for a lost cause.
but i also know her to be a quite a competent peace maker and diplomat. it was bush's war, not hillary's.

i just want a good primary. a full and fair airing of the democratic platform. and i will work as hard as i can for the winner. so, my other than hill thoughts are with those that would bring a cogent debate, and not just a big bag of talking points.

re dennis, all short guys are alike dont ya know. and that was aaaalll that was wrong with dennis as a candidate. just being short.
right right.

brooklynite

(94,713 posts)
7. Explain how he wins a national election
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 03:43 PM
Aug 2014

A lot of people grab for someone who agrees with them philosophically; getting elected and governing effectively call for other skills.

mopinko

(70,198 posts)
9. i think his take on issues is straightforward and understandable.
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 04:34 PM
Aug 2014

he did make mention that he might run if it was gonna be only hillary.

only trouble i see is he is too short.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
13. That may be so....but it doesn't mean you win elections....
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 06:04 PM
Aug 2014

Show me ANY poll that says he can beat ALL Republicans!

mopinko

(70,198 posts)
40. there is no poll.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 12:30 PM
Aug 2014

unless it is his own, and he has chosen not to share it. so your criticism is moot. maybe you can pay for one.
and again, show me how he is a socialist. not that that is a bad thing. it might just ring with a big part of the base.
i am all ears.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
41. there is for Hillary Clinton
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 01:13 PM
Aug 2014

She beats all their asses. Until you all can produce someone who can do better...(esp a non Democratic Socialist...). I am backing the champ!

elleng

(131,077 posts)
15. He ran unsuccessfully for Mass governor.
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 06:56 PM
Aug 2014

There was a five-way battle for the Democratic nomination for governor, contested among Massachusetts State Treasurer Shannon O'Brien, President of the Massachusetts Senate Thomas Birmingham, former Democratic National Committee and American Israel Public Affairs Committee chair Steven Grossman, former United States Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, and former nominee for lieutenant governor Warren Tolman.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_gubernatorial_election,_2002

As much as I agree with him on policy, I don't think he'd be a great candidate. Charisma is necessary. I like him a lot, but don't think he'd be the best choice.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
28. That's right, it was Mittwit.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 12:20 AM
Aug 2014

I thought it might have been one of their other repukes , like Jane "None Too" Swift.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
30. He spent MILLIONS to get that job, to use as a launching pad for the Presidency.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 03:17 AM
Aug 2014

His ads were on constantly, he out-spent six ways to Sunday and lied out his ass.

He promised JOBS. He said he was a businessman who knew how to bring JOBS to western MA. People didn't know him then like they do now.

He lied. People who wanted JOBS believed him.

He brought NO jobs. In fact, many people left the state in search of ... JOBS.

And he didn't do the job he was elected to do. He left that to his incompetent 2nd banana--who did a HORRIBLE job, and lost to Deval Patrick. That's why he was a one term governor, aside from using the position to launch himself to national fame, he couldn't get re-elected on a bet--his constituents in MA thought he stunk on ice.

The joke was if you needed a MA state cop you had to go to NH, because Mittsy spent most of his time there and had a huge and bloated "protection" detail of flabby, fleshy staties to keep him safe from the unwashed masses.

mopinko

(70,198 posts)
39. that is what his stated intentions were.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 12:27 PM
Aug 2014

to prevent a hillary coronation, and force a primary discussion.

wyldwolf

(43,869 posts)
20. you know what's so funny about this thread so far?
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 08:27 PM
Aug 2014

The OP is about Sanders (mostly.) Sanders was called a socialist (which he is) and now people are demanding proof that REICH is a socialist. Bizarro.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
22. Well - I think it would be a first in at least one aspect in Presidential races
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 11:07 PM
Aug 2014

He spoke of having had a date with Hillary when both were single and in college.

http://content.time.com/time/video/player/0,32068,2695602210001_2153048,00.html

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
46. Draft isn't a "want to" centric word and no one cares about your alleged contacts
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 01:04 PM
Aug 2014

I also see little reason to care about the wants of politicians anyway, they need to worry about what the people need and want. The damn tail does not wag the dog.

brooklynite

(94,713 posts)
47. Sorry, I'll stick to the real world...
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 03:02 PM
Aug 2014

...where people run for office because they decide they want to, or don't (as "uncaring" as that might be).

By the way, care to share with us the efforts YOU've made to convince Brown, or Sanders or anyone else to do "what the people want and need"? Or is that someone else's job?

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
50. Not being rich I don't get one on one time at fundraisers and also have to do crazy shit like
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 11:59 AM
Aug 2014

work my 45 or 50 hours and maintain my home as not to have time to setting up packs and organizing election bids so all I can do is call and write making my request and my case that they do so, I am not of influence nor do I even really know people of influence at that kind of level.

What should I be doing O' Oracle?

brooklynite

(94,713 posts)
56. Too bad nobody's invented a way to mail a letter...
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 07:07 PM
Aug 2014

...or maybe even send one electronically! Then you could encourage them to run in your own words. And wouldn't it be great if there was technology to allow you to communicate with other like-minded and organize a coordinated effort to encourage your candidate to run? Well, maybe next time...

(FWIW-know how I got private face time with Brian Schweitzer at the Convention? I sent hom an email)

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
59. Too bad no know one has invented reading comprehension, it would have made such action discernable
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:36 AM
Aug 2014

in the previous post.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
31. Reich has no national following.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 03:35 AM
Aug 2014
He failed at the governor's race (not his fault, entirely, it was a big field).

He's never held elective office. He has been a cabinet official, but it's not one of the Top Three (State, Defense, AG).

He has no fifty-state fundraising machine, and he's unlikely to get any help on that score from the state movers/shakers or any of the congressional fundraising PACS, or any of the other popular PACS. As a never elected, no ground game pundit, he's late, late, LATE outta the gate--he would have needed to start going around and shaking hands at the state level two years ago--really.

He's SHORT, very short--as in "WAY too short to qualify to serve in the military" short. Short males have a hard time winning elections. That is not a disparagement (jury take notice), that is simply a fact. They've won, occasionally, but the taller candidate usually prevails: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heights_of_presidents_and_presidential_candidates_of_the_United_States

He's burned a few bridges. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/interviews/reich.html
If he'll tell tales on his boss/friend of many decades, he'll tell tales on anyone. Some perceive him as "disloyal."

I don't think he's got any potential as a candidate. I'd see Bill Richardson running (again) before Reich (and I don't know how likely he is, either).

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
32. As much as I like Reich I agree with you
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 06:49 AM
Aug 2014

Plus he's a policy wonk. Although Obama is as well, Obama is a very gifted speaker which is something that is rare.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
37. And ... Obama is tall, and he had friends in the Senate when he was first running.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 11:51 AM
Aug 2014

He was able to put together a ground game quite quickly. He had YOUTH on his side, too--people forget how YOUNG his daughters were when he first took office.

Reich CAN give a good speech, and he can handle himself in debate (though it comes off better on the radio) but I just don't think he's got "it."

Electing a President is a "visual" process, even if we don't want to admit that...it's also superficial on some levels!!!

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
48. I hope both Warren and Sanders run
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 03:44 PM
Aug 2014

The more candidates, the better, imo.

Let the people decide. May the best man or woman win.

Unvanguard

(4,588 posts)
53. Sanders won't win, I suspect he realizes that, and it wouldn't necessarily be good if he did.
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 01:09 PM
Aug 2014

If he does run, I'll probably vote for him anyway.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Okay, Warren's not runnin...