2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy Are Politicians So Boring?
I was on the phone with an avid supporter from Philadelphia a few minutes ago. He told me that he really liked me. Flattered, I asked him why. Because, he said, Im not boring.
Not boring. These days, that is high praise for any elected official.
Turn on any news channel in America today, and you will find yourself drenched in trite nonsense. Nothing but tautological talking points, and vapid buzzwords. Its ubiquitous. Its as though everyone were reading a bad script written by Ed Wood, the winner of the Golden Turkey Award for Worst Director of All Time.
I take a different approach. Sometimes Im right and sometimes Im wrong, but I always try to be interesting. I figure that if youre going to take the time to listen to what I have to say, I owe you that much. Think of me as the love child that Oscar Wilde and Dorothy Parker never had, possibly because she was just seven years old when he died.
But, frankly, that way, I seem to be a minority of one. And Ill tell you why. The others are afraid.
They know that if they say anything even remotely entertaining or thought-provoking, they will be gutted like a fish. Theyll get the Full Monty: hourly attacks on Fox News, round-the-clock vilification on Hate Radio, evisceration at hundreds of right-wing websites, and blistering thirty-second smear ads.
In fact, Im being attacked that way right now, just ten days before our election.
My opponent has set up a slur-site that not only viciously assails my personal life and my professional accomplishments, but also catalogs what she calls hate speech. That, basically, is every interesting thing Ive ever said. Needless to say, she is particularly ticked off about the things that Ive said about Republicans:
● When her mentor Dick Cheney called for US troops on the ground against ISIS, I said that Cheney never met a war he didnt like.
● When Cheney attacked President Obama unjustly at the beginning of his first term, I said that many Americans wished that Cheney would STFU.
● Calling out Congressional Republicans for their obstructionism, I said that on CNN that they are foot-dragging, knuckle-dragging Neanderthals.
● When MSNBC publicized a photo of President Bush and a Saudi prince kissing each other, I suggested that if Bush had let him get to second base, gasoline might be only a dollar a gallon.
● I referred to the sewer money that the GOP poured in against me in 2010 as 30 pieces of silver.
● After Ted Cruz shut down the U.S. Government, I said that Cruz represents the party of the GOP that is trying to hasten the Apocalypse.
● And, of course, I mocked the Republican Party for their healthcare plan: Dont get sick, and if you do get sick, die quickly.
To me, these critiques are all richly deserved which is why I said them. But to my opponent, theyre hate speech.
Ill admit, I have been guilty of the occasional metaphor. Also alliteration, allusion, analogy, anticlimax, antithesis, consonance, ellipsis, epanodos, euphemism, homography, hyperbole, mimesis, rhythm, rhyme, puns, sibilance, syncope, synecdoche, and my personal favorite, irony. Yes, Im guilty, guilty, guilty. (Oh, God, theres epanodos again.) When it comes to figures of speech, Im a serial swiller.
And this revs up the right-wing indignation machine to 1,000,000 CPM (counterrevolutions per minute). All the conservative pearl-clutchers clutch their pearls. (Whats the phrase? Pearls before swine?) They fret about the corrosive effect of truth on civilization. And my opponent depicts stylistic devices as weapons of mass destruction.
The good people of Orlando, my fair city, have seen millions of dollars of Koch Brothers TV ads condemning me as a national embarrassment solely because I simply say whats on my mind and more often than not whats on your mind too. And to fight back, I need your help today. Not tomorrow. Today.
We are approaching a point where every progressive candidate in America will face a choice: be neutered, or spayed. I am trying to demonstrate that there is a different way to do this job: say what you mean, mean what you say, fight like hell for whats right, and win.
And we can win. But only with your help. Give us that help, right now.
I often portray what we do as a campaign for justice, equality and peace. But its also a campaign for intelligent, evocative, mental liberation. And against boring, clichéd tripe. Help us keep it going.
[Warning: double musical allusion below.]
Courage,
Rep. Alan Grayson
I stand accused of the things Ive said.
● U2 and B.B. King, When Love Comes to Town (1988).
You tell me its the institution.
Well, you know, youd better free your mind instead.
● The Beatles, Revolution (1968).
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Why do they always ask for money?
demwing
(16,916 posts)Duh?
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)If I was to ask for money, I would make sure I answer at least a few of the posts.
demwing
(16,916 posts)your response was neither respectful, nor deserving of anything more responsive than my retort.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Im still waiting for his response.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Your petulance is noted. While you wait, I encourage you to hold your breath.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)No effing shit. That's what I'm talking about.
demwing
(16,916 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)If youre not his spoke person.
The point seem to be flying over your head.
demwing
(16,916 posts)But I don't think you want a serious response, unless "Why do they ("They" being politicians, and in this case, specifically Rep. Grayson) always ask for money" is your idea of a serious question.
I think you just wanted to be snarky, thus my similarly snarky response.
Response to demwing (Reply #14)
darkangel218 This message was self-deleted by its author.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)Do you get the impression that Rep Grayson is reluctant to answer? The guys seems fearless. If he's not answering, I doubt it's because the question is intimidating.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)you're free to respond, and I'm free to defend him
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... to be interesting - some because of their devotion to democracy, some because of their off-the-wall bat-shit craziness, and everything in between.
I think the ones I find truly boring are those who speak in blue links - that ALL lead back to filling their campaign coffers.
demwing
(16,916 posts)elections cost money, and someone as intelligent as you should appreciate how hard it is to raise the funds to stay competitive without nursing from the corporate teat.
RKP5637
(67,088 posts)many democrats waffle and follow the right wing drift. It's a losing model, and IMO loses the respect of voters. If one wants a really right leaning democratic, they might as well vote for the real thing, republicans. And waffling democrats fracture the party leading to loss elections. IMO many Americans respect those having the guts to stand true to the values of their party and not running around trying to be, for example, a "me too" republican.
The democratic party truly needs a paradigm shift. IMO, the democratic party is in a rut, those trying to be more right wing thinking that gets votes. It is stupid! If the democratic party wants to secure elections, then all the wood needs to be behind one arrow!
Alan Grayson is one of the few democrats I have a lot of respect for, because he stands true to the democratic party and does not take any bullshit.
demwing
(16,916 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)All they want to do is take our money, be it through donations or through taxes.