Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Uh oh. Unaffiliated CT Gov candidate Joe Visconti has just endorsed Tom Foley (Original Post) MANative Nov 2014 OP
Damn! hrmjustin Nov 2014 #1
My first reaction was also a four-letter word, but not that one. Ends in "k". MANative Nov 2014 #2
This may be too late. Dawson Leery Nov 2014 #3
That certainly did cross my mind, too. I'm also hoping that... MANative Nov 2014 #4
True, not a lot of time to get that news out there customerserviceguy Nov 2014 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #7
maybe it is his union busting past noiretextatique Nov 2014 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #9
No way! You can't be on a Democratic Underground forum talking against unions. Are you a troll? Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #10
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #12
so he did a good think by busting the union? noiretextatique Nov 2014 #11
Thanks so much! You caught that, too! Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #13

MANative

(4,112 posts)
2. My first reaction was also a four-letter word, but not that one. Ends in "k".
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 03:12 PM
Nov 2014

Feeling pretty certain that this was planned all along.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
3. This may be too late.
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 03:33 PM
Nov 2014

Visconti is on the ballot (an all absentee's have been sent in).
I expect him to take at least 2% on Tuesday.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
4. That certainly did cross my mind, too. I'm also hoping that...
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 03:38 PM
Nov 2014

people are so tired of all the hype that they've stopped listening, and won't pay attention to this. May not be a very realistic hope, but I've got to hang on to something.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
5. True, not a lot of time to get that news out there
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 10:17 PM
Nov 2014

Had he done it a week earlier, it might well have had some impact. Still, based on my personal observations, I expect Malloy to lose. I see a lot of CT license plates on the Garden State Parkway every morning that I sure didn't see five years ago.

Response to MANative (Original post)

Response to Name removed (Reply #6)

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
8. maybe it is his union busting past
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 12:14 AM
Nov 2014

They [former T.B. Wood's workers] say Foley fired hundreds of members of United Auto Workers Local 695 and brought less-skilled replacements into the plant he bought in 1986 and took over from the last of the family owners just before the 1990 strike. Foley sold the company in 2007 for about $40 million in his accumulated stock holdings.

When the 325 union members narrowly turned down a three-year contract, Foley refused to return to the bargaining table in the township of about 20,000 people, 50 miles southwest of Harrisburg.

A new contract was never settled, the strike finally fizzled out in 1993 and the UAW local died. Along the way, workers lost their homes, pulled children from college and tightened their belts while living on $100-a-week strike wages.

http://www.aflcio.org/Blog/In-The-States/A-Peek-into-Tom-Foley-s-Past-Broke-the-Back-of-the-Union-the-Heart-of-Their-Town

Response to noiretextatique (Reply #8)

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
10. No way! You can't be on a Democratic Underground forum talking against unions. Are you a troll?
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 12:41 AM
Nov 2014

Treat lightly!

Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #10)

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
11. so he did a good think by busting the union?
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 12:43 AM
Nov 2014

i am old enough to remember when the US auto industry was actually trying to make fuel-efficient cars. and now...they are making gas-guzzling muscle cars again. how, exactly, does that help anyone besides shareholders? perhaps if they had to fend for themselves, they'd make better decisions, like the businesses in the real world who don't have the option of running to the government to bail them out for the bad decisions they continue to make.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Uh oh. Unaffiliated CT Go...