Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 02:52 PM Jul 2015

Martin O'Malley expresses 'extreme displeasure' in PAC publishing anything negative against anyone

___Reporters ask leading questions, snotty questions, inappropriate questions and questions that are important to furthering the public’s knowledge. The latter is the business of a free press, but, alas, they often forget. Rather than the press, it was inquisitive people, some of them supporters, some merely the curious, in this particular audience who asked sensible questions. Some of O’Malley’s answers to some of the good questions Sunday were:

“The genius of our land is immigration.” This in answer to what he thinks of immigration problems.

“No other people leave their kids with a mountain of debt.” This in regard to student college loans that bankrupt our kids before they even get a job.

“A good trade treaty raises standards for workers and the environment.” This in regard to a question about his position on the Trans Pacific Partnership in Congress right now. O’Malley does not support this trade agreement because he thinks it’s too secret, it takes even more jobs away from the U.S. than we’ve given up to date and it doesn’t consider the environment.

“We live in a perverse system where there are no limits on super PACs,” he said. “Citizens United should be called ‘Citizens Don’t Matter.'” This O’Malley answer was in response to a negative ad under his name published by a super PAC. He told them of his “extreme displeasure” in their publishing anything negative against anyone, including Democratic Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders (‘Bernie Sanders is no progressive when it comes to guns’) or, if it came up, to Hillary Clinton, the top runner in the Democratic field.


read more: http://greenecountynewsonline.com/2015/07/01/will-omalley-be-an-extension-of-obama/

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Martin O'Malley expresses 'extreme displeasure' in PAC publishing anything negative against anyone (Original Post) bigtree Jul 2015 OP
K & R Koinos Jul 2015 #1
all of the wailing and gnashing of teeth over that PAC ad bigtree Jul 2015 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #3
he's already 'disassociated' from it bigtree Jul 2015 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #7
How many months until the Iowa Caucus and NH primary? How many until FSogol Jul 2015 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #12
I vote in 11 months! JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #13
In 11 months his lead will increase to 50,542,106,513,726,817% FSogol Jul 2015 #15
I noticed that also Andy823 Jul 2015 #4
Right, Andy, and I ain't playing, elleng Jul 2015 #6
I expect nothing but the same accountability from every other candidate when a bad PAC ad Raine1967 Jul 2015 #10
Glad to hear it. n/t FSogol Jul 2015 #9
And that is all he can do. Raine1967 Jul 2015 #11
Thanks for posting bigtree JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #14
Truth has a funny way of killing nonsense. Koinos Jul 2015 #16

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
2. all of the wailing and gnashing of teeth over that PAC ad
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 03:32 PM
Jul 2015

...and questions about why O'Malley doesn't denounce them.

Then, crickets when he does so...hard to take these complaints seriously.

Response to bigtree (Reply #2)

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
5. he's already 'disassociated' from it
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 03:44 PM
Jul 2015

...by law.

It's amazing how many people make up their own narrative about his collusion with the PAC and rail against him for the ad from that imaginary point. I'd listen to the candidate and anything actually put out by his campaign, rather than fringe political groups.

The suggestion that he's in single digits because of that ad is some laughable prognostication, but you go with that if it helps your brand of advocacy.

Response to bigtree (Reply #5)

Response to FSogol (Reply #8)

FSogol

(45,476 posts)
15. In 11 months his lead will increase to 50,542,106,513,726,817%
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 09:06 PM
Jul 2015


Uh oh, looks like another Ham sock has left the building.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
4. I noticed that also
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 03:39 PM
Jul 2015

I think it's the same bunch of complainers who started out going after president Obama, then the democratic party as a whole, then Hillary Clinton, now O'Malley, and who knows who they will complain about next! The sad thing is most of them have jumped on the
Sanders bandwagon, and when they play the "victim" card all the time with Bernie it comes off bad for Bernie. I really like Bernie and his message, I like O'Malley's more because of his record of doing things, however those who constantly post negative things, or play the "victim" card, no matter which candidate they may support, are just playing their old games, and are NOT helping their candidate.

elleng

(130,865 posts)
6. Right, Andy, and I ain't playing,
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 04:01 PM
Jul 2015

not commenting any longer on 'he should blah blah blah.'

I like him because of his record of doing things, his clear ability to accomplish even in VERY difficult circumstances, and his 'heart.'

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
10. I expect nothing but the same accountability from every other candidate when a bad PAC ad
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 05:10 PM
Jul 2015

comes out…

Actually I don't.

That brouhaha was silly and I am glad to see Martin saying this.

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
11. And that is all he can do.
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 05:13 PM
Jul 2015

It's not he can legally go to the PAC and say take it down and stop it.

Thanks for posting this, big tree.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Martin O'Malley expresses...