Is Hillary Clinton Trying To Influence Iran Deal Outcome On A Défavorable Way?

[mylye2222]

http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/311442/hillary-clinton-says-iran-will-always-be-existential-threat-to-israel/

Really we can wonder...

Lool as Hillary Clinton was not bad at all as SoS espercially re. Womens right issues, she has not been , unlike her sucessor Secretary Kerry , a risk-taker and it has shown up. Well, she may be fairly rewarded because she initiated it along with President Obama BUT didnt involved personnaly. Secretary Kerry has and is still spending countless hours working hard to succede a good deal.
Secondly the question is raised whatever she really wants a deal or not, and on worst case, trying to sink the deal... in certain political purpose, in highlighting her own State record.
On a more personnal politics tone, it shows she is once again backstabbing her own camp in order to personnal career gain. Totaly pathetic IMO if it is rhat so.
(And it would be not the first time Clinton camp backstabs Obama, and Kerry hum? )

[Maedhros]

1. I think that might be a bit of a stretch.

I see this more as pandering to AIPAC and pro-war Democrats.

[leveymg]

2. Yes. More Bibi than Bibi. That's what she seems to be trying to do with her statement here:

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said on Saturday that even if a deal is reached with Iran over its nuclear program, Tehran’s “aggressiveness will not end” and it will remain a principal state sponsor of terrorism.

“They will continue to destabilize governments in the region and beyond. They will continue to use their proxies like Hezbollah. And they will continue to be an existential threat to Israel,” Clinton said at a campaign event.

Read more: http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/311442/hillary-clinton-says-iran-will-always-be-existential-threat-to-israel/#ixzz3f904KSPj