Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 12:44 AM Jun 2012

Why wasn't Tammy Baldwin, or better still, Russ Feingold, the recall candidate?

Instead we had to settle for the same guy who got whipped by Wanker in 2010. And he got slapped in the face again, this time literally.

More to the point, why can we only win if we have a once-in-a-generation rock star candidate like Obama, but they can win with any old frat boy who got a coed knocked up? (that could be either Wanker or Bush**, by the way)?

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. Feingold is on the POTUS reelection team as a campaign co-chair.
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 12:52 AM
Jun 2012
http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/02/obama-campaign-announces-cochairs-115161.html

I think he's teaching at the university level, as well.

I would guess that Baldwin is needed in the House, we are trying to take that back, after all... but I don't know much about her.

marasinghe

(1,253 posts)
6. that's what a number of us were wondering.
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:16 AM
Jun 2012

guess the fact of Russ Feingold losing his seat in the last election should have been a reminder & a warning to us that -
the US electorate has the enlightened self-interest and common sense of the apocryphal swan-dive of lemmings into fjords.
at least Russ has the intelligence not to put himself at the electoral mercy of a mob of sheep being led to slaughter.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
7. Because they didn't want to lose?
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:28 AM
Jun 2012

And they would have lost too. The jackass won by a point more than he won the original election. He is who Wisconsin wanted the first time and most of the voters thought he was unfairly recalled whether they liked his latest policies or not.

Both of the suggested candidates would have been outspent 7:1 as well. Hell, more, much more if it looked like there was any chance Walker would lose.

Take what little good came out of last night and run with it.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
10. If Feingold couldn't retain his Senate seat in WI
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 12:22 PM
Jun 2012

Even as an incumbent ... What makes you think he could have done better than Barrett in the governor recall election.?

Do you really think the problem was that the Democrats didn't have a sufficiently progressive candidate? If so, I think you are not seeing the picture of what the electorate in states like WI is about.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
11. Actually, I thought the problem was that we had the same candidate who had just been beaten
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 03:52 PM
Jun 2012

Same old, same old.

Baldwin and Feingold are the two highest-profile WI Dems I could think of offhand. It doesn't hurt that they're progressive, either.

Hippo_Tron

(25,453 posts)
14. A loss (especially a narrow one) isn't a referendum on one's entire career
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 12:41 AM
Jun 2012

LBJ, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama all lost elections before becoming President of the United States.

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
13. Maybe they didn't want it.
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 07:01 PM
Jun 2012

Considering how recalls generally go, if I were either one of them I probably would have passed as well. Would love to see Feingold go for it after this term is over though. That would be awesome!

Julie

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why wasn't Tammy Baldwin,...