Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,810 posts)
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 08:55 PM Jul 2012

"New Poll Shows Obama’s Ads Having Greater Influence In Battleground States"

New Poll Shows Obama’s Ads Having Greater Influence In Battleground States

by Pema Levy at TalkingPoints Memo

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/07/new-poll-shows-obamas-ads-having-greater-influence-in-battleground-states.php

"SNIP.......................................

The barrage of ads from both the Romney and Obama campaigns are informing the voting decisions of a small but decisive number of voters in swing states — and according to the latest USA Today/Gallup poll, President Obama’s ads are proving more influential than Mitt Romney’s.

In the new poll of voters in 12 battleground states — where the dozens of campaign ads are running — one out of 12 voters said that they had changed their minds about the candidates. Among that small number of voters, a whopping 76 percent now support President Obama while just 16 percent now prefer Romney.

Overall, the race is all but tied in the swing states, with Obama leading Romney 47 percent to 45 percent.

We gave them new information,” Obama campaign manager Jim Messina told USA Today, explaining why Obama’s ads are proving more effective.

.....................................SNIP"
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"New Poll Shows Obama’s Ads Having Greater Influence In Battleground States" (Original Post) applegrove Jul 2012 OP
It isn't "all but tied," it's tied. Only a 2 point difference with a 4 point margin of error. pnwmom Jul 2012 #1
It depends on how you define "swing states" quaker bill Jul 2012 #2
The aggregate battleground poll numbers are useless. woolldog Jul 2012 #5
good point. n't pnwmom Jul 2012 #6
A better point is that people want to believe bad news about Rmoney quaker bill Jul 2012 #3
Mittens may have $$ treestar Jul 2012 #4

pnwmom

(108,996 posts)
1. It isn't "all but tied," it's tied. Only a 2 point difference with a 4 point margin of error.
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 09:16 PM
Jul 2012

I thought Obama was supposed to be ahead in the swing states. Now it looks like he must be losing ground.

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
5. The aggregate battleground poll numbers are useless.
Tue Jul 10, 2012, 12:40 AM
Jul 2012

You need to look state to state. Romeny could have a huge edge in one state and Obama a small edge in most and the battleground poll would be close.

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
3. A better point is that people want to believe bad news about Rmoney
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 09:40 PM
Jul 2012

everyone knows he is rich, and everyone knows that a substantial portion of the RW does not trust him. Obama's team is simply filling in the blanks for them.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"New Poll Shows Obam...