Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumState and National Polls Tell Different Tales About State of Campaign
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/24/state-and-national-polls-tell-different-tales-about-state-of-campaign/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter-snip
In theory, state polls and national polls must ultimately agree with each other: the whole must equal the sum of the parts. In practice, they leave a different impression about the state of the presidential race.
Consider that as of Tuesday afternoon, President Obamas lead in the RealClearPolitics average of national polls was 1.3 percentage points over Mitt Romney.
But Mr. Obama led by a mean of 3.5 points in the RealClearPolitics averages for the 10 states (Ohio, Virginia, Florida, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Iowa, Nevada, Michigan, New Hampshire and Wisconsin) that are most likely to determine the election outcome, according to our tipping point index. If the list is expanded to cover the five other marginally competitive states where RealClearPolitics calculates a polling average Arizona, Minnesota, Missouri, New Mexico and North Carolina Mr. Obamas lead averages 3.1 points, according to the numbers.
While that isnt an enormous difference in an absolute sense, it is a consequential one. A one- or two-point lead for Mr. Obama, as in the national polls, would make him barely better than a tossup to win re-election. A three- or four-point lead, as in the state polls, is obviously no guarantee given the troubles in the economy, but it is a more substantive advantage.
The difference isnt an artifact of RealClearPoliticss methodology. The FiveThirtyEight method, which applies a more complicated technique for estimating polling averages, sees broadly the same split between state and national polls.
Or if you prefer a bare-bones approach, you can take a count of the polls conducted in swing states: how many show leads for Mr. Obama, and how many put Mr. Romney on top?
In polls from the top 10 tipping point states since June 1, Mr. Obama has led by any margin in 43 surveys, while Mr. Romney has held the lead in nine of them. more at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1187 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
State and National Polls Tell Different Tales About State of Campaign (Original Post)
flamingdem
Jul 2012
OP
NBC poll, today, gave Obama a six point lead nationally. 49-43. Posted some where here today.
demosincebirth
Jul 2012
#1
demosincebirth
(12,543 posts)1. NBC poll, today, gave Obama a six point lead nationally. 49-43. Posted some where here today.
longship
(40,416 posts)2. Meaningless national poll.
We elect by state, not by national. Although it is nice to see Obama ahead, citing a national poll doesn't mean much of anything.
It is thet electrical college thang.