Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
90 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton has a 79% favorability rating among our fellow Democrats (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 OP
And that is the only favorable we need! leftofcool Oct 2015 #1
Hillary is Likable is my new motto riversedge Oct 2015 #4
Democrats are 30% of the electorate. How do you plan to win the GE with 30%? (nt) jeff47 Oct 2015 #9
high favorables help with gotv 6chars Oct 2015 #16
GOTV of 30%. You still need another 20.1% to win the GE. jeff47 Oct 2015 #17
only if other side gets out 100% of its vote 6chars Oct 2015 #38
30% assumes we get 100% of our vote. So it's worse than that simplified subject for both sides. (nt jeff47 Oct 2015 #39
More evidence about why she's the front runner! MoonRiver Oct 2015 #2
There's actually positive movement among almost every demographics. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #3
slow but sure. Persistance pays off. riversedge Oct 2015 #5
... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #7
yes, see this if you have not already... riversedge Oct 2015 #84
Very impressive and stable. NCTraveler Oct 2015 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #8
Did somebody go there? DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #11
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #13
This is apocryyphal DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #27
Those are favorable/unfavorable and the 61% figure you cited is nowhere to be found, am I right? DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #37
I keep saying it the arithmetic....... Historic NY Oct 2015 #44
Name Removed can read what you wrote but he can't respond. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #47
At the risk of appearing to defend Name Removed, what does the 62 represent under "whites"? arcane1 Oct 2015 #79
Name Removed was alluding to a 61% figure which doesn't exist. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #80
Correct. It's apparently 62% n/t arcane1 Oct 2015 #81
Name removed said it was her untrustworthy numbers that weren't measured... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #82
Look at Bernie go with the top 4%! OilemFirchen Oct 2015 #10
What do you think about the toxic observation one of our interlocutors made in Post 8? DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #12
I think it tells us everything we need to know about that poster. (n/t) OilemFirchen Oct 2015 #14
Would you agree it is profoundly disappointing that one of the denizens of this august board... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #15
I would. OilemFirchen Oct 2015 #22
Perhaps we can take solace in the fact that this in the internet and folks aren't always who they... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #28
No "thinking" about it. It's been underscored and highlighted. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #18
If there isn't already a thread about this, there should be. OilemFirchen Oct 2015 #33
Our interlocutor changed his handle to Name Removed. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #43
Name Removed needs to get a fucking life... SidDithers Oct 2015 #58
It is annoying... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #60
Shocked! OilemFirchen Oct 2015 #73
+1 Historic NY Oct 2015 #45
Holy moley. But what's sad is that this will do absolutely NOTHING to put a dent in some Number23 Oct 2015 #87
The majority of Lions fans view QB Matt Stafford more favorably than leftupnorth Oct 2015 #19
Wrong. Stafford would be every bit as good as Rodgers if he played for Green Bay. Dawgs Oct 2015 #35
Lol! Touché leftupnorth Oct 2015 #42
79% of 30%! ibegurpard Oct 2015 #21
Thank you for kicking my thread. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #34
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #23
That is demonstrably false DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #40
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #46
There are twenty one sub groups DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #50
Record high numbers artislife Oct 2015 #24
Like I have said before. WHEN CRABS ROAR Oct 2015 #74
I think that, besides his large audiences, most people do not Maraya1969 Oct 2015 #25
Democrats will for the most part vote for the democratic candidate regardless Vattel Oct 2015 #26
What no bern? workinclasszero Oct 2015 #29
Stupid polling... MattSh Oct 2015 #30
Kick & highly recommended! William769 Oct 2015 #31
Months (decades) of media bashing and her numbers go up. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #32
Kick. She will never win the general. Dawgs Oct 2015 #36
In your head shenmue Oct 2015 #53
No minority problem for Sanders. zappaman Oct 2015 #41
It's impossible to win! With no president in 2016, I'm moving to Denmark. Hortensis Oct 2015 #48
These are good polling numbers for Hillary Clinton Gothmog Oct 2015 #49
And look who's doing better with independents and republicans? Bernie. Bread and Circus Oct 2015 #51
And who's Independent unfav numbers have increased since July? Bernie. DCBob Oct 2015 #56
Good catch DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #59
I merely posted the candidate's respective favorables but thank you for kicking my thread. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #57
Just because you posted it for one reason doesn't mean we can't point out it has stuff that undercut Bread and Circus Oct 2015 #62
Thank you, again, for kicking my thread DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #63
You are welcome and here's another bump. Bread and Circus Oct 2015 #68
I am not hip enough to know what "meep meeping" means but thank you for kicking my thread. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #69
Well I didn't get polled... SoapBox Oct 2015 #52
i never get polled. retrowire Oct 2015 #65
Black votes matter! DCBob Oct 2015 #54
well this completely explains Sheepshank Oct 2015 #55
I think alot of this stems from Bernie not being a Democrat. DCBob Oct 2015 #61
well I admit that not only does it irk me that he does just what you said, Sheepshank Oct 2015 #66
He's like the neighborhood punk throwing rocks at your house... DCBob Oct 2015 #85
Yeah this must be behind the "tea party digs Bernie" posts workinclasszero Oct 2015 #72
An excellent result for Clinton. hanks for posting. K & R nt Persondem Oct 2015 #64
Great numbers for Hillary! lunamagica Oct 2015 #67
If asked I would have given her a favorable rating... lame54 Oct 2015 #70
Me, too. KansDem Oct 2015 #76
Same here. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #78
I've Said It Before . . . Gamecock Lefty Oct 2015 #71
K&R! stonecutter357 Oct 2015 #75
K&R! stonecutter357 Oct 2015 #77
The other 21% are on DU redstateblues Oct 2015 #83
Its interesting Bernie unfavs with African Americans are so high. DCBob Oct 2015 #86
The only thing I can think of that explains that is his campaigning with Cornell West Number23 Oct 2015 #88
I think Cornell was a net negative for Bernie Sheepshank Oct 2015 #89
We were just talking about the Press Secretary's vanishing from public view a week or so ago Number23 Oct 2015 #90

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
17. GOTV of 30%. You still need another 20.1% to win the GE.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:39 AM
Oct 2015

(Subject assumes only two candidates for simplicity)

6chars

(3,967 posts)
38. only if other side gets out 100% of its vote
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:56 AM
Oct 2015

elections are more about motivating base these days than about winning swing voters.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
39. 30% assumes we get 100% of our vote. So it's worse than that simplified subject for both sides. (nt
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:58 AM
Oct 2015
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
6. Very impressive and stable.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:25 AM
Oct 2015

It will probably go up a notch as the email crew begin to get their asses handed to them. I predicted a while ago that her favorability will go higher as the email story continues. It happens every time after a right wing witch hunt on the Clintons. It will happen to even a greater extent now that isolationists and "socialists" helped to carry the water for Gowdy in pursuit of their "revolution."

Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
11. Did somebody go there?
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:30 AM
Oct 2015
Thanks for pointing out that 61% of the white voters do not trust Clinton.



Yes. Thank God it wasn't a Clinton supporter

Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #11)

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
20. This is apocryyphal
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:40 AM
Oct 2015
Thanks for pointing out that 61% of the white voters



Where did I point that out? It isn't the data I cited.

Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #20)

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
37. Those are favorable/unfavorable and the 61% figure you cited is nowhere to be found, am I right?
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:55 AM
Oct 2015

You were so much more entertaining when you were regaling us with your disquisitions on race.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
79. At the risk of appearing to defend Name Removed, what does the 62 represent under "whites"?
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 02:13 PM
Oct 2015

It appears to be a 62% unapproval. I'm happy to be corrected if I'm mistaken.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
82. Name removed said it was her untrustworthy numbers that weren't measured...
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 02:21 PM
Oct 2015

Don't fret ...Name Removed probably has more socks than the equipment manager for the New York Giants.


He will be back...

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
12. What do you think about the toxic observation one of our interlocutors made in Post 8?
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:32 AM
Oct 2015

Thank you in advance.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
15. Would you agree it is profoundly disappointing that one of the denizens of this august board...
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:37 AM
Oct 2015

Would you agree it is profoundly disappointing that one of the denizens of this august board uses those lens in which to see the world?

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
28. Perhaps we can take solace in the fact that this in the internet and folks aren't always who they...
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:48 AM
Oct 2015

Perhaps we can take solace in the fact that this in the internet and folks aren't always who they hold themselves out to be.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
33. If there isn't already a thread about this, there should be.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:52 AM
Oct 2015

After all, National Review is a must-post source for Sanders supporters. And, sans a few snarky sentences, it could have been lifted from HaHa Goodman.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
43. Our interlocutor changed his handle to Name Removed.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 12:07 PM
Oct 2015

I suspect Name Removed has already returned...

Maybe I am not twelve years old any more but i don't see the point of keep returning , again and again, to a venue from where i have been removed.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
60. It is annoying...
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 12:35 PM
Oct 2015

It takes a twelve year old's mentality to keep getting banned and keep returning. I would use the r word to describe the behavior but it's a pejorative.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
87. Holy moley. But what's sad is that this will do absolutely NOTHING to put a dent in some
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 09:32 PM
Oct 2015

people's beliefs here that Republicans think Sanders is a stronger candidate than Hillary.

leftupnorth

(886 posts)
19. The majority of Lions fans view QB Matt Stafford more favorably than
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:40 AM
Oct 2015

Green Bay QB Aaron Rodgers.

Even though Aaron Rodgers is a much better Super Bowl QB than Stafford.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
35. Wrong. Stafford would be every bit as good as Rodgers if he played for Green Bay.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:53 AM
Oct 2015

Go Lions! Go Dawgs!

leftupnorth

(886 posts)
42. Lol! Touché
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 12:02 PM
Oct 2015

Sadly, I think the lions are on track for another perfect 0-16 season.

After 58 years of failure to advance to the big show, it may be time to reconsider whether the Ford family should still own the team.

I guess I'm just fed up with mediocrity and failure, in politics and sports!

Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #40)

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
50. There are twenty one sub groups
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 12:16 PM
Oct 2015

There are twenty or so sub groups:





She is up in 19 ? 20? of them.



If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.

-Albert Einstein

WHEN CRABS ROAR

(3,813 posts)
74. Like I have said before.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 01:47 PM
Oct 2015

Now is the time for a real progressive populist movement, but the message needs to be clear and not overly complex and it needs to be repeated over and over to drive it home into the minds of the people.

Then Bernie will win.

Maraya1969

(22,497 posts)
25. I think that, besides his large audiences, most people do not
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:45 AM
Oct 2015

know about him. They need to do a lot more TV ads. I've asked about 5 people if they new of Bernie Sanders and they all said, "no"

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
26. Democrats will for the most part vote for the democratic candidate regardless
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:45 AM
Oct 2015

of whether it is Bernie or Hillary. And Bernie has a much better favorable to unfavorable ratio than Clinton does with independents. Moreover, Bernie's favorable to unfavorable ratio among all registered voters is better than Clinton's. So this poll makes it look like Bernie is more electable than Hillary. But that's inconceivable!

MattSh

(3,714 posts)
30. Stupid polling...
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:51 AM
Oct 2015

Why is Biden even in this thing? To dilute Bernie's numbers?

Biden ain't declared nothing, so he's irrelevant, regardless of what ABC and WaPo would like you to believe.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
51. And look who's doing better with independents and republicans? Bernie.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 12:16 PM
Oct 2015

Your own post punctures your own "electibility" argument.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
62. Just because you posted it for one reason doesn't mean we can't point out it has stuff that undercut
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 12:39 PM
Oct 2015

undercuts one of your core arguments. Which in fact does have.

I don't mind bumping your thread that shoes Bernie Sanders has been fav/unfavs with indys and repubs than Hillary which undercuts one of your core arguments. No. Not at all.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
68. You are welcome and here's another bump.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 12:54 PM
Oct 2015

Am I supposed to regret responding to you now? Are you meep meeping me?

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
54. Black votes matter!
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 12:27 PM
Oct 2015

Fav/Unfav with Black voters:

Hillary: 80-18
Bernie: 37-33

Clearly that is huge problem for Sanders. He cannot win with numbers like that.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
55. well this completely explains
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 12:30 PM
Oct 2015

why Bernie must try to appeal outside of the party he previously scorned but now tries to attach hinself to. He must try to appeal to Republicans. Excellent move that should make other liberal Dems feel warm and fuzzy about.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
61. I think alot of this stems from Bernie not being a Democrat.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 12:37 PM
Oct 2015

I think it irks many people he is trying to get the nomination without joining the party.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
66. well I admit that not only does it irk me that he does just what you said,
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 12:51 PM
Oct 2015

it irks me that Bernie badmouthed the Party and and said it would be hypocritical to run as a Dem when he scorned the Dem Party, and Bernie Supporters think that is just fine and dandy. I suppose anything goes when trying to get ones foot into the Whitehouse, including flagrant hypocrisy....which doesn't make Bernie any more special that any other candidate in that respect. I am irked that this special noble mantel is bestowed on Bernie when he has treated the Dem Party so shoddily.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
85. He's like the neighborhood punk throwing rocks at your house...
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 07:39 PM
Oct 2015

then expects to be invited for Christmas dinner.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
72. Yeah this must be behind the "tea party digs Bernie" posts
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 01:18 PM
Oct 2015

Because he lost the base voters of the democratic party so.....

lame54

(35,321 posts)
70. If asked I would have given her a favorable rating...
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 01:14 PM
Oct 2015

Last edited Tue Oct 13, 2015, 02:09 PM - Edit history (1)

but she's not getting my primary vote

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
78. Same here.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 02:13 PM
Oct 2015

I like Sec. Clinton, and will absolutely agree that she's well-qualified to be President. I will campaign for her and gladly vote for her, should she win the nomination, but Bernie's getting my primary vote.

Gamecock Lefty

(700 posts)
71. I've Said It Before . . .
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 01:18 PM
Oct 2015

Bernie may have held liberal positions longer than others that have evolved over time, but the fact he is running as a Dem still irks me especially since he has abhorred the two-party system for so long.

If I was flat-out honest I’d say I align with Bernie’s positions a little more (without all his anger) than any other candidate, but the fact is I like Hillary better and believe she will make a better leader than BS.

I was even disappointed with her decision regarding TPP. I was actually in favor of that trade agreement!

Make America Even Greater – Elect Hillary!

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
86. Its interesting Bernie unfavs with African Americans are so high.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 07:42 PM
Oct 2015

I never thought he would connect very well with AA voters but I wouldn't have thought he would be seen as being unfavorable. He's really in a hole now and I doubt he will be able to dig himself out.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
88. The only thing I can think of that explains that is his campaigning with Cornell West
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 09:40 PM
Oct 2015

or perhaps his exchanges with BLM.

Hillary's black support hasn't changed much either way. But Bernie's unfavorables with black voters have gone UP by over 10% since July.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
89. I think Cornell was a net negative for Bernie
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 10:39 PM
Oct 2015

He was working to improve the BLM kerfuffle, and the fell off the track with Cornell. I thought he was on a better track when he hired a female BLM organizer (I think she was an organizer or spokesperson). I never heard from her again after her welcome to the sanders campaign. There was hope this was supposed to lead towards something positive.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
90. We were just talking about the Press Secretary's vanishing from public view a week or so ago
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 10:47 PM
Oct 2015

in the AA forum. Some of the members there said the same thing you just did. After all the fanfare over her assuming the role it's incredibly odd that she hasn't been heard from since.

She seemed to be a bright woman, so I wouldn't be surprised if she was one of the many, MANY poc who tried to tell Sanders that campaigning with Cornell West at his side was the last thing he needed to be doing if he wanted to rally black folks to support him.

Sanders' message hasn't changed that much so beyond his interactions with BLM and campaigning with Cornell, I honestly don't know what else could be behind the spike in his unfavorables with black voters.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton has a 79%...