2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDKos's One Pissed Off Liberal...nail on head again.
Performance and polish vs policy and truthIt seems a bit silly to me to argue about who 'won' the debate. Not because I thought my guy, Bernie, lost, I don't think that at all, but because people who have already chosen a candidate will see it through the 'optics' of their preexisting views. I'm sure Hillary won in the eyes of her supporters and the same goes for Bernie and his supporters. I think all of that is beside the point.
....There were also contrasts between the democratic candidates, perhaps subtler but no less important contrasts. While Bernie was characteristically blunt, others were threading needles, back peddling and dodging questions.
Webb scary fucker, don't throw a hand-grenade at him.
O'Malley polished, self-absorbed and devoid of honest emotion.
Chafee goofy and uninteresting. His claim to fame? Never had a scandal.
Hillary polished and charming but threading needles and dodging questions, particularly on Iraq and Wall Street.
Bernie blunt and honest with the best interests of the American people clearly at heart.
Except for Bernie, they were all performers in the classic sense. They were trying to look presidential. Hillary won that competition. She was smooth and well rehearsed. I'd give O'Malley a not-so-close second on that point. He was very polished and well-spoken but his determined effort to immediately turn every answer to his record, while maybe a 'smart' debate tactic, underscored what he is most interested in, himself.
wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)It seems a bit silly to me to argue about who 'won' the debate. Not because I thought my guy, Bernie, lost, I don't think that at all.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)for arrows (thinking about your logo or should I say Hillary's)
wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)Perfect for Sandernistas.
Response to wyldwolf (Reply #6)
Post removed
wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)...for a Third Way corporatist.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)HRC camp got that down pat.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)2. TIME: Sanders 60% | Clinton 12%
3. CNN: Sanders 81% | Clinton 12%
4. Drudge: Sanders 61% (126,448 votes) | Clinton 6.74% (13,925 votes)
5. Dailykos: Sanders 59% (7,970 votes) | Clinton 34% (4,659 votes)
6. Slate: Sanders 75% | Clinton 18%
7. Syracuse: Sanders 78.11% (3,190 votes) | Clinton 15.77% (644 votes)
8. Fox5: Sanders 77.35% (30,248) | Clinton 15.86% (6,204 votes)
9. MSNBC: Sanders 81% | Clinton 12%
10. Wishtv8: Sanders 77.65% | Clinton 13.15%
11. Advocate: Sanders 77% | Clinton 19%
12. Nationalreview: Sanders 558 votes | Clinton 39 votes
13. 9news: Sanders 8.9k votes | Clinton 2.2k votes
14. Wwnc: Sanders 78% | Clinton 15%
15. Philadelphia.cbslocal: Sanders 81.03% | Clinton 14.56%
16. Postonpolitics: Sanders 84% | Clinton 10%
17. AJC: Sanders +225 -20 | Clinton +62 -108
18. Controversialtimes: Sanders 84.42 | Clinton 10.39
19. Tcpalm: Sanders 74% | Clinton 18%
20. WRIC 8NEWS: Sanders 75% | Clinton 6%
21. WGY: Sanders 68% | Clinton 12%
All three focus groups declared Sanders the victor.
1. Frank Luntz Focus Group: The participants agreed overwhelmingly that Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders was the big winner at the first Democratic debate.
2. Fusion Focus Group: Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders was the most popular candidate among a group of young registered Democrats responding to Tuesdays Democratic presidential debate in Las Vegas. The panel voted 8 to 3 for Sanders against the runner-up Hillary Clinton, with one panellist saying it was a tie between the two.
3. CNN Focus Group: Majority of CNN Focus Group Think Sanders Won First Debate
http://www.emediaworld.com/politics/sanders-won-the-cnn-poll-but-you-must-see-this.html
nolabels
(13,133 posts)Wasn't there a poll one time or another where 16-17% of the populous believed there have been space in aliens that have been or currently in contact with earth.
Funny thing how they have came out with a new thing today that they have discovered a large space aliens structure only a few thousand light years away.
wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)Perfect for Sandernistas.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)There is some serious seething in those posts....
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Been going on for years.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)Not sure why I thought that.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)rwsanders
(2,606 posts)and the fact that you made sure you posted first must mean he did really, really great.
wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)The progressive conspiracy and faux outrage engineers have been working too long today.
rwsanders
(2,606 posts)Buh bye.
wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Hillary presented herself very well. Didn't win my vote, but she has her act together.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,216 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)That was my honest impression of Hillary's performance about 3/4 way through the debate. I thought Bernie did well, but then my support is based on more than a debate performance or a poll or a blog post... People on DU are losing their shit trying to prove THE WINNER!!1! My question, like the OP's, is to what end? What do you think winning the DU fracas buys you? Nothing was decided last night and there's a long way to go.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)There are two camps at issue in this regard... the group of pundits who gave their corporate-directed opinion, and all the other groups who participated in polls.
2. TIME: Sanders 60% | Clinton 12%
3. CNN: Sanders 81% | Clinton 12%
4. Drudge: Sanders 61% (126,448 votes) | Clinton 6.74% (13,925 votes)
5. Dailykos: Sanders 59% (7,970 votes) | Clinton 34% (4,659 votes)
6. Slate: Sanders 75% | Clinton 18%
7. Syracuse: Sanders 78.11% (3,190 votes) | Clinton 15.77% (644 votes)
8. Fox5: Sanders 77.35% (30,248) | Clinton 15.86% (6,204 votes)
9. MSNBC: Sanders 81% | Clinton 12%
10. Wishtv8: Sanders 77.65% | Clinton 13.15%
11. Advocate: Sanders 77% | Clinton 19%
12. Nationalreview: Sanders 558 votes | Clinton 39 votes
13. 9news: Sanders 8.9k votes | Clinton 2.2k votes
14. Wwnc: Sanders 78% | Clinton 15%
15. Philadelphia.cbslocal: Sanders 81.03% | Clinton 14.56%
16. Postonpolitics: Sanders 84% | Clinton 10%
17. AJC: Sanders +225 -20 | Clinton +62 -108
18. Controversialtimes: Sanders 84.42 | Clinton 10.39
19. Tcpalm: Sanders 74% | Clinton 18%
20. WRIC 8NEWS: Sanders 75% | Clinton 6%
21. WGY: Sanders 68% | Clinton 12%
All three focus groups declared Sanders the victor.
1. Frank Luntz Focus Group: The participants agreed overwhelmingly that Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders was the big winner at the first Democratic debate.
2. Fusion Focus Group: Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders was the most popular candidate among a group of young registered Democrats responding to Tuesdays Democratic presidential debate in Las Vegas. The panel voted 8 to 3 for Sanders against the runner-up Hillary Clinton, with one panellist saying it was a tie between the two.
3. CNN Focus Group: Majority of CNN Focus Group Think Sanders Won First Debate
Clearly, the overwhelming majority thinks Bernie won. It's not even close.
http://www.emediaworld.com/politics/sanders-won-the-cnn-poll-but-you-must-see-this.html
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)I was impressed when he found out he had inadvertently hurt someone's feelings. He posted a big apology post. That's being kind.
Uncle Joe
(58,424 posts)Thanks for the thread, madfloridian.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)instead of re-iterating his policy positions & making it about him, he instead
reflected on how cool it was to be one-of-5 on a debate stage having an intelligent
debate about real issues voters deeply care about -- in stark contrast to the GOP freak-
show of insults & petty bickering about how best to screw the American "Little People",
immigrants & minorities & poor folk, along with how best to further destroy the
middle-class in America.
I liked that.
I'm a Bernie support however, and feel Bernie did great over-all.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)MadCrow
(155 posts)He definitely highlighted the contrast between the Democratic and Republican debates.
O'Malley also made points with this Bernie supporter. I think the OP was too rough on him.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)I disagree with him on that.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Although I do think Hillary showed some flashes of fire and unscriptedness. She needs to do that more.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Not necessarily. But maybe a little.
elleng
(131,128 posts)for a candidate about whom many knew little, and whose most important asset is his record accomplishing difficult tasks as an executive.
Too damn bad some see this as 'self-absorbed.'
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)FSogol
(45,527 posts)Whose record and ideas should have O'Malley spoken about?
Reminds me of during the last election when the Washington Post printed an article accusing HRC of being ambitious. Like anyone running for the Presidency of the US wouldn't have ambitions.
* OP meaning the writer of that article, OPOL. I'm not referring to madfloridian.
elleng
(131,128 posts)FSogol!
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)And he put on a good showing.
Now America has a better grasp of who Bernie is. Hillary has been running forever, Bernie just started. Bernie wins!
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)I totally agree with you. Both sides can argue, but undeniably, Senator Sanders won for the reasons you gave. You hit the nail on the head.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)No, no, it's not that SHE is unlikable, it's that people tend to like men more as they become more powerful and tend to like women less as they become more powerful. That why her enemies on the right and in the MSM have been telling their audiences every day how unlikeable she is.
That people are talking about everything in politics BUT the giant factor of her womanhood does not mean it doesn't exist. It means it's far more pernicious and embedded in our power structures than people realize.
That's only one of the "she did everything they did but did it dancing backwards and in high heels" things that went on on that stage last night. Women have to be better to be seen as equal. And she was SO great that she managed it, and then some.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Four of them were in a debate, Hillary was auditioning for DWTS.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)What is that cartoon in your responses? I see it every time you post, but I have no idea what it is. It's great art
DJ13
(23,671 posts)I ran across it in a .gif search on Google a long time ago, then decided to use it.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)I can't stop watching it! I like your Hitch Hiker's Guide avatar too! I picked Dean as my avatar long before he endorsed Hillary. I'm pretty disappointed in him for that.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Power corrupts I guess.
FSogol
(45,527 posts)tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Her being the first woman POTUS is an advantage since she brought it up all on her own last night.
Her answer to the question of how her presidency would differ from President Obama's was kind of weird.
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)She completely turned me off last night.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)I wouldn't vote for anyone just because of gender and I don't think that should be a campaigning point (if it were, VP Palin would have been a selling point for McCain).
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Becoming more powerful has endeared more people to Elizabeth Warren, not less.
Hillary comes across as an authoritarian, something she inherited from her classical conservative dad.
But she did come across as more likable in this debate. She was very polished, and part of that is appearing "likable". She's had some tutoring.
To me the appearance does not matter. It's the meat of the debate that matters and in my opinion, Bernie still won, because he does not have to play games in getting his point across and accidentally saying something he really does not mean. Truth always wins out.
eridani
(51,907 posts)--part. That reminded me of "We came, we saw, he died." Utterly disgusting. Iranians certainly aren't saints, but they are thousands of times better than the Saudis.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)Just put aside the propaganda spewed forth by the corporate mouthpieces. Put aside the inside-the-Beltway crowd and just ask this one question: who walked out of that auditorium with much more than they walked in with? If the stats being reported as to money raised as a result of the debate, number of new Facebook followers, and opinions of focus groups, the answer is Bernie Sanders walked out with much more than he arrived with.
I call that a winner.
Sam
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Thousands of new followers on the web, 2 million dollars in overnight donations...A lot.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)People like reality shows, celebs and fashion fueled by the pathetic media. I wish America would grow up.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)historylovr
(1,557 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Thanks OPOL!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)Then yeah, Hillary won in that area.
NonMetro
(631 posts)I think that kind of language should be reserved exclusively for people like Ben Carson and Ted Cruz. Now there's a pair of "scary fuckers!"
Dem2
(8,168 posts)It seems the author's bias came shining through at this moment since clearly this is open to interpretation.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)as answers by the others on various subjects. His Black Lives Matter and gun control answers were learned a few months ago but of course only he can evolve. Everyone else is lying.
I doubt he can ever live up to the expectations of his supporters. At some point they will see him as yesterday's news.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)So, what does that say?
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)How Hillary Clinton supporters thought she won the debates between her and Barack Obama, back in 2008.
It doesn't mean much, does it?
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)Until the BernieBots took over.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Interesting.