2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNew Poll: Monmouth: HRC 48%, BS 21%, JB 17%
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/trackers/2015-10-19/clinton-support-rises-to-48-after-debate-monmouth-pollDemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 19, 2015, 12:48 PM - Edit history (1)
As you can see by my avatar I am a huge boxing fan...
There is a saying in boxing that "old boxers don't paint great canvases, they become part of them."
My advice to Joe is there is no shame in quitting while you're ahead.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I would not have given him my vote but I would have stood up for him at every turn. Now, not sure about that. I don't think many have really looked at how much time he has taken to make this decision. If one takes this long, they shouldn't be entering the race for the Presidency. At this point we know it wasn't all about family and soul searching. It's about watching the numbers. Something I fully understand and appreciate but I don't respect the deeply personal decision rhetoric anymore. That isn't what it is about and he dragged it out to the point it is obvious.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I'd always suspected that his stated reasons for delaying any announcement was so that he could better asses the situation and his chances of being successful. Of course, family matters are a part of the overall decision process, but that element can be determined in much less time than he's taken so far.
At this point, it appears that he's poll-watching and trying to figure out of there's enough donors left that will make him a viable candidate.
Nobody wants their (likely) last campaign to be unsuccessful, so I can understand his being hesitant. He's not the type of candidate who would run for pure vanity reasons. He's also not the type of candidate who would run simply to shape the debate or to pull the party further in one direction or the other. He'd only run if he truly believed that he could win it.
I think he's smart enough to know that he's not likely to win the nomination.
still_one
(92,381 posts)much respect for him anymore. This is the same Joe Biden who would not permit other witnesses to testify on behalf of Anita Hill at the Clarence Thomas hearings, and at the same time pontificated the other side was playing advocate for Thomas. Joe, NO one was an advocate for Anita Hill, and it was you and the Democrats who invited her to testify on sexual harassment charges against Thomas, and then left her hanging.
BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)I also really don't see his appeal. I don't see anything he offers that isn't covered by Clinton, Sanders, or O'Malley.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Let me preface my remarks by saying I am Barack Obama's most stalwart supporter but Hillary benefits from that she gets to run on everything people like about his policies and none of the stuff people dislike. Biden, as the sitting vice president, has to run on all of it...
Romulox
(25,960 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)"Biden will split the Center/Right vote in the primaries. That's why Hillary is scared."
very likely to support Biden actually switch their vote, Clinton would maintain a lead of 42% to 27% for
Biden, with Sanders falling to third place at 20%
http://tinyurl.com/nv9rcnc
If Biden gets in ,HRC will still have a solid lead in the polls, the battle between her and Joe will consume all the free media coverage, thus leaving none for the septuagenarian independent from Vermont.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)You are so often confused on some of these matters. Perhaps taking some time to familiarize yourself with the process will help you enjoy your participation here more.
juajen
(8,515 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Bernie Sanders' support is a mile deep and an inch wide and is mostly confined to homogeneous hamlets. Please post polling results from heterogeneous states like Florida, South Carolina, Nevada, California, New York, Georgia, North Carolina, et cetera.
Thank you in advance.
That being said, if I was approaching these discussions from a position of intellectual inferiority I might be tempted to camouflage it by patronizing my interlocutors as well but my stellar character would prevent me from doing so.
In that vein you shouldn't feel superior to anybody.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)If your "interlocutor" was someone as sensitive as you are, the temptation might prove irresistible!
That said, my point stands!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)And who is a servant of the status quo.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)-Franz Kafka
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Lisa D
(1,532 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)It was a cheap shot dressed up in highfalutin language to make it look grand.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)him and Hillary.
Bernie would dissappear.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)There is a segment of Bernie's support that is not positive towards him, but has gravitated to him as the anti-Clinton, not based on their relative positions, but just on dislike for her. A chunk of those folks may flip to Biden.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)It's amazing how some thought that someone like Hillary could be crushed in a debate.
I think they were expecting ner to be a babbling and stammering fool, shaking in her shoes with intimidation at the mere presence of Sanders.
Well...Surprise!
redwitch
(14,946 posts)She is polished, poised and professional. Any who thought she would be unprepared for anything asked of her is delusional. It didn't hurt either that Bernie Standers helped her with his "your damn emails" comment. Her response to that was wonderful. They both looked like good people for it.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)she'd implode on stage.
I agree that they both looked like good people woth the emails comment
juajen
(8,515 posts)I believe we should mimic their reaction, and have respect for people who disagree with us.
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)uponit7771
(90,359 posts)stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Stuckinthebush
(10,847 posts)NOTE: Clintons support is up from 42% a month ago; Sanders is about the same vs 20% last month; Bidens support is down from 22%
I think you are seeing voters settling down with their decisions. Barring any major mishap in future debates, it is all Hillary.
oasis
(49,401 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)uponit7771
(90,359 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)enid602
(8,648 posts)I think Biden was urged to run to ensure we have a strong dem candidate, should the witchhunt against Hillary proved successful. He is a patriot.