Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,860 posts)
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 11:20 PM Oct 2015

DNC approves Black Lives Matter presidential town hall.

'The Black Lives Matter movement seemingly has more clout with the Democratic National Committee than Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb and former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s political opponents may not have been able to secure more debates for the 2016 presidential primaries, but the DNC has agreed to a town hall discussion hosted by the #BlackLivesMatter network and Campaign Zero activists.

“We believe that your organization would be an ideal host for a presidential candidate forum – where all of the Democratic candidates can showcase their ideas and policy positions that will expand opportunity for all, strengthen the middle class and address racism in America,” DNC CEO Amy K. Dacey said Wednesday in a letter to movement’s leaders, the Washington Post reported.

The ball is now in their court.

Black Lives Matter organizer Elle Hearns said the DNC’s decision not to host an additional debate on racial themes, after a request was made Tuesday, was disappointing.

“Their response to our request is unsatisfactory. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should be more mindful of her responsibility not only to the DNC, but to the American people,” Hearns told the newspaper.

Activist DeRay Mckesson said Wednesday he is working to secure commitments from all presidential candidates to attend a town hall, the Post reported. He will also attempt coordinate a similar effort with the Republican National Committee.

“We want to bring together all of the candidates, not focused on either political party, to have a conversation centered on race and criminal justice,” Mckesson said.

http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/dnc-approves-black-lives-matter-presidential-town-hall/

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DNC approves Black Lives Matter presidential town hall. (Original Post) elleng Oct 2015 OP
Very cool! Agschmid Oct 2015 #1
excellent! ibegurpard Oct 2015 #2
great now let all the other groups get a "town hall" and presto, more debates nt msongs Oct 2015 #3
Sounds good to me bravenak Oct 2015 #4
Heh. Remember when BLM was called "Soros funded" and a "pro-Hillary" organization?? Number23 Oct 2015 #6
Hell yeah!!! bravenak Oct 2015 #7
Theyon't "feel comfortable" in the AA? ... Good! ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2015 #11
I remember. Agschmid Oct 2015 #15
No shame. No moral compass. joshcryer Oct 2015 #25
Results LiberalArkie Oct 2015 #34
Thanks, Arkie. And serious props to Juror #1 because the truth is exactly what my post was Number23 Oct 2015 #37
Fabulous!! Thanks for posting this! Number23 Oct 2015 #5
Damn that DWS! ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2015 #8
Don't you know? BLM wants REPUBLICANS to be there too! joshcryer Oct 2015 #29
They wanted a debate, but only got a forum jfern Oct 2015 #9
And the difference ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2015 #13
Usually by a forum they mean they interview the candidate sequentially jfern Oct 2015 #14
Every "forum" that I have seen/benn a part of ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2015 #18
I think Rachel described the one she's 'conducting' as sequential, no dialogue. elleng Oct 2015 #20
Either way, this is a good thing, although a debate-style format would have been better. DWS at least deserves partial credit for putting BLM issues front and center. InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2015 #35
They also want Republicans there. joshcryer Oct 2015 #27
Barely, they're trying to get Twitter to host it. joshcryer Oct 2015 #26
Well the logo "debate" in 08 changed my mind gwheezie Oct 2015 #33
Great! a debate would be better but I'll take this marym625 Oct 2015 #10
Yes...at least it's a start in addressing BLM issues. InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2015 #36
I hope the discussion is good, but I doubt that it will be. Vattel Oct 2015 #12
first time I ever "recced" a World Nut Daily article!nt m-lekktor Oct 2015 #16
I figured that Chitown Kev Oct 2015 #23
Here is a better link BumRushDaShow Oct 2015 #30
They worried about us black turning on the status quo. JRLeft Oct 2015 #17
Since We Haven't Seen Anything Resembling the Mythical "Debate" in Decades The Roux Comes First Oct 2015 #19
outstanding Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #21
Now I guess that the entire DNC has Stockholm Syndrome, I guess. Chitown Kev Oct 2015 #22
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #24
Inside snark referring to a post here... joshcryer Oct 2015 #28
This is good news yuiyoshida Oct 2015 #31
that's fine and all AnAzulTexas Oct 2015 #32

Number23

(24,544 posts)
6. Heh. Remember when BLM was called "Soros funded" and a "pro-Hillary" organization??
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 11:34 PM
Oct 2015

And when certain folks high fived Ben FREAKING Carson for dissing BLM in the most dishonest, ignorant and craven ways possible??

And isn't it just precious and adorable that the same folks who said these sorts of things are now racing around DU talking about how they don't "feel comfortable" in the AA forum???

Who'd have thunk it?????

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
7. Hell yeah!!!
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 11:38 PM
Oct 2015

They are being oppressed!
By the few blacks that remain.
All fifteen of us have them hostage!!
Why are they still here? Stockholm Syndrome? I have it so maybe they are unwell with SS too.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
11. Theyon't "feel comfortable" in the AA? ... Good! ...
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 11:46 PM
Oct 2015

Discomfort is the first step in problem solving.

LiberalArkie

(15,708 posts)
34. Results
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 03:52 AM
Oct 2015

On Thu Oct 22, 2015, 03:45 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Heh. Remember when BLM was called "Soros funded" and a "pro-Hillary" organization??
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=711988

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Shit stirring.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Oct 22, 2015, 03:51 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Truth *isn't* sh_t stirring. Leave.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Just an opinion. Not over the top.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Just saying what is.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Cannot reply to automated messages

Number23

(24,544 posts)
37. Thanks, Arkie. And serious props to Juror #1 because the truth is exactly what my post was
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 04:07 PM
Oct 2015

And it appears that the alerter knew that entirely.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
8. Damn that DWS! ...
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 11:43 PM
Oct 2015

She is SOOO in the tank or HRC, she'll even approve a BLM forum for the Democratic candidates ... that have largely ignored speaking directly to BLM, and other issues of interest to the Democrat's most loyal base.

But that said, why limit it to BLM?

I know ... I know ... I'll NEVER be satisfied!

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
29. Don't you know? BLM wants REPUBLICANS to be there too!
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 01:14 AM
Oct 2015

PROOF that DNC is IN THE TANK with Republicans and that the BLM movement is merely a shill for the oligarchy!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
13. And the difference ...
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 11:49 PM
Oct 2015

especially, in these highly scripted formats, is what?

Actually, "forums" can/will be more illuminating, as they are more unpredictable.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
14. Usually by a forum they mean they interview the candidate sequentially
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 11:52 PM
Oct 2015

and they're not on the stage at the same time. But I don't know if that's the format here.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
18. Every "forum" that I have seen/benn a part of ...
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 12:07 AM
Oct 2015

except the republican "values" thing has had a panel of participants, with a question asked and plenty of dialogue among the participants ... Which for me is more useful than a series of scripted, and predictable, questions ... allowing the participant to give, largely, unchallenged, non-answers.

elleng

(130,860 posts)
20. I think Rachel described the one she's 'conducting' as sequential, no dialogue.
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 12:25 AM
Oct 2015

I agree your version more useful than scripted questions.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,122 posts)
35. Either way, this is a good thing, although a debate-style format would have been better. DWS at least deserves partial credit for putting BLM issues front and center.
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 08:04 AM
Oct 2015

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
26. Barely, they're trying to get Twitter to host it.
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 01:11 AM
Oct 2015

They don't technically have a venue or anything like that. But if this gets pressure and a lot of press we can get someone to host it. As of now they only have the DNC's blessing. Hopefully the DNC comes out and actually hosts it somewhere.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
33. Well the logo "debate" in 08 changed my mind
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 01:42 AM
Oct 2015

Even though it wasn't a debate, I watched it. It changed my opinion about 2 candidates who I decided I would never vote for based on their responses to lgbt issues. Edwards and Richardson were awful. Gravel and kucinich were terrific on that issue but I had other reasons for not supporting them. Obama was pretty good but had some tortured response about his faith. Hillary had a similar position as Obama but was less uncomfortable answering the questions. So I wrote off Richardson and Edwards. I wanted to like Edwards but after that forum, debate whatever I couldn't stand the guy.
So I hope they all attend the blm forum it may be more enlightening than a debate.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
12. I hope the discussion is good, but I doubt that it will be.
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 11:48 PM
Oct 2015

The subject tends to bring out the worst in politicians.

The Roux Comes First

(1,298 posts)
19. Since We Haven't Seen Anything Resembling the Mythical "Debate" in Decades
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 12:20 AM
Oct 2015

why quibble about what it is called?

It's great to have BLM front and center and with a potential op to ask pointed questions of those candidates with sufficient courage to show up!

Response to Chitown Kev (Reply #22)

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
28. Inside snark referring to a post here...
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 01:12 AM
Oct 2015

...equating black support for DNC/Clinton as being held under Stockholm syndrome.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»DNC approves Black Lives ...