2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy It’s Ridiculous To Call Bernie Sanders Sexist
Battles are won by identifying the enemy and defeating them, not by imagining enemies and shooting blindly into the darkness."
Here's the full article.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)This kind of thing can alienate a lot of people who would be allies.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)our society operates and the messages we recieve. Many of us hold sexist views that we do not notice. I certainly do at times.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Read it.
As a senator from a rural state, what I can tell Secretary Clinton, that all the shouting in the world is not going to do what I would hope all of us want, and that is keep guns out of the hands of people who should not have those guns and end this horrible violence that we are seeing.
https://medium.com/@thorbenson/why-it-s-ridiculous-to-call-bernie-sanders-sexist-e3988e5ebc4b#.ve7vfmax4
There is no accusation that Hillary was shouting. Bernie agreed with Hillary that the goal is "to keep guns out of the hands of people who should not have those guns and end this horrible violence that we are seeing."
There is no suggesting that Hillary is doing the shouting, and indeed, she was not shouting.
But Bernie is right. Shouting about gun legislation will not change the gun culture in our country. We need a movement that brings Americans together to change the gun culture.
merrily
(45,251 posts)He used a phrase talking about gun control that he's used for years and Hillary's campaign made up bs that he was accusing her of shouting and accusing women of shouting is sexist.
Give me a damned break.
RandySF
(59,182 posts)By getting off the topic. If you're explaing, you're losing.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)be interpreted as directed at Hillary. There were others on the stage. Hillary was not shouting.
It is a cheap trick on Hillary's part to accuse Bernie of meaning women or her in that sentence.
I do wonder about the level of language comprehension of those who claim that statement is sexist.
There is not one word in it directed at women or Hillary.
What a cheap trick on the part of the Hillary camp.
It's downright dishonest.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)There, I fixed it for you. He directly addressed her.
thesquanderer
(11,991 posts)...does not have to mean he was talking ABOUT her.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Men shout just as women do. I can think of other words that Bernie could have used that would have been sexist, but that sentence is not sexist.
It is not sexist for one candidate to respectfully address another. Using the words "Secretary Clinton," and addressing a statement to her using that title and name is not disrespectul or sexist.
This is an absurd, overly sensitive complaint. It reflects badly on Hillary and her fans.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Kind of like those Rovian Swiftboaters.
The Bush campaign could say, "WE're not implying that Kerry was a coward. (nudge, nudge, wink wink)"
Crafty but not exactly ozzing with integrity.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Not that you care a lick no doubt.
The feeling is quite mutual.
There is NO case against Sanders here. Despicable what you are doing.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)You guys keep lists now? Well, bye Felicia.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Well done.
boston bean
(36,223 posts)that prop up this system of equality, we ought to ignore it?
Because those inequalities don't exist in a vacuum. They exist in each and every single one of us. And to combat it, we need to be aware of our subconscious biases, that we learn from this inequal society we live in.
No one can do that if it's not able to be discussed, because some man, white person, straight person, is so delicate that they can't handle some introspection.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)and totally agree. The victim spin the Hillary camp tried to put on a very interpretable phrase trivializes and dilutes the much deeper issues women, particularly working class women, face in our society: getting fair wages, access to healthcare, good childcare, etc. There was no verbal insult, and to make one up unfortunately has the effect of weakening the cause and hurting women. This should be beneath her.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)your post is perfect and I'm just going to stand here next to you...
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Nitram
(22,869 posts)Sanders thoughtlessly accused everyone else of shouting rather than calmly discussing the gun control issue. At lest that's what it sounded like. He probably didn't mean it that way. We get it. So what. It's small potatoes. Let it go. take a deep breath and move forward. Obsessing over this very trivial bump in the road is a waste of time. Blowing it totally out of proportion is a waste of time.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Women are smart and when they hear suggestions or accusations of sexism they want to know what the hell is going on. The campaign was hoping to create an implication or mood towards Bernie of him being sexist. They dialed their language specifically to have this effect.
The more people talk about this the more my female friends ask "what did he say that was sexist?"
When they hear about it they usually roll their eyes and some of the feminists I speak to actually get upset about throwing around the word "sexist" or implying it when there are real issues on the table.
Nitram
(22,869 posts)If you find any by Clinton supporters, maybe we could count them up and compare.
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)He could have said "tilting at windmills" or he could have said "pissing in the wind" and that wouldn't have meant that people were literally doing either of those things. Same with "shouting."
===============
Robbins
(5,066 posts)being racist or not caring about immigrants can't work so being sexist is all they got.
the Clinton playbook is to play the victim.
azmom
(5,208 posts)For trying to discredit Bernie with this kind of smear.
I hold Hillary in contempt for using such a vile attack.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)It always takes me almost two weeks to figure out if a statement is insulting.