Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
Mon Aug 27, 2012, 11:57 AM Aug 2012

If Akin should go then so should Holmes (lets tie them together).

Background from Rachel's show. You need only watch the first minute or so to see what I am talking about but the whole thing is worth watching.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/#48732520







This man said that "Concern for rape victims is a red herring because conceptions from rape occur with approximately the same frequency as snowfall in Miami".

He also has a lifetime appointment as a Federal Judge.

If Akin is unacceptable, even to Republicans, for an elected position that lasts only 6 years then how can Holmes be acceptable in a lifetime position?

Isn't there political advantage here to making them explain their hypocrisy? It also brings to light that Akin was not an isolated case. These people actually believe these things.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Leon_Holmes

^snip^

James Leon Holmes (born 1951) is a United States federal judge. He currently serves as Chief Judge of the Eastern District of Arkansas.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Akin should go then so should Holmes (lets tie them together). (Original Post) Motown_Johnny Aug 2012 OP
These guys aren't fringe Republicans, they're now mainstream Republicans. Scuba Aug 2012 #1
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If Akin should go then so...