Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumVoting in favor of defense appropriations is not the same thing as voting for the IWR.
I'm sorry, but saying the two are even remotely similar is just silly.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 642 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Voting in favor of defense appropriations is not the same thing as voting for the IWR. (Original Post)
NuclearDem
Nov 2015
OP
It's all they've got... at least it shows they recognize how horrible her record is!
reformist2
Nov 2015
#1
reformist2
(9,841 posts)1. It's all they've got... at least it shows they recognize how horrible her record is!
reddread
(6,896 posts)2. that tactic appears juvenile in the extreme
looking smart isnt part of that equation.
msongs
(67,416 posts)4. politicians voting for endless war and killing by funding it ... now that's juvenile nt
reddread
(6,896 posts)5. as opposed to dishonesty
that path should not be respected.
bigtree
(85,998 posts)3. true, but funding isn't insignificant
...it's what fuels the military deployments, and refusing funding is what subsequently ends them.
It's no accident that the IWR references to the War Powers Act which recognizes Congress' ability to weigh in on these deployments initiated without prior congressional approval. Their constitutional role in approving or denying funds is their ONLY effective lever in limiting or neutering a president's ability to wage war.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)6. Hillary supporters seem to have a Republican - level problem
With false equivalence.
treestar
(82,383 posts)7. If Bernie were so against it
He'd at least symbolically vote against the funding.
That's the standard others would be held to.