2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPoll Shows Hillary Clinton Is Seen as More Likely Than Bernie Sanders to Be Effective
With the Democratic presidential nomination contest all but officially a two-person race, Hillary Rodham Clinton appears vastly better positioned than Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont to persuade party primary voters that she would be more effective at passing her agenda and dealing with international crises, according to a New York Times/CBS News survey released Thursday.
Mrs. Clinton even undercuts Mr. Sanders on his core political message, with 62 percent of Democratic primary voters saying she could bring about real change in Washington, compared with 51 percent for Mr. Sanders.
The promise of change, always a popular lure in politics, is at the heart of a striking paradox in the Democratic race. Democratic primary voters say that the ability to deliver needed change is the most important quality they seek in a candidate, and Mr. Sanderss popularity is highest with voters who want change. Yet 60 percent of Democrats also want their nominee to continue President Obamas policies, and these voters support Mrs. Clinton over Mr. Sanders by about a 2-to-1 margin.
This advantage for Mrs. Clinton may reflect all-around skepticism that Mr. Sanderss leftist candidacy can prevail: Her partys primary voters expect Mrs. Clinton to be their eventual nominee by more than a 4-to-1 margin over Mr. Sanders.
His chief indictment against Mrs. Clinton, that she is an establishment politician who is captive to big-money special interests and inconsistent on liberal priorities, simply has not persuaded many Democrats to abandon her. While 84 percent of them see Mrs. Clinton as under the sway of special interests, she is still the heavy favorite among Democratic primary voters seeking a candidate who is a strong leader with the right experience to be president.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/13/us/politics/poll-shows-hillary-clinton-is-seen-as-more-likely-than-bernie-sanders-to-be-effective.html?_r=0
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Congress. Clinton is a mover and shaker, works with others, knows how to move on issues and apparently by Sanders grading of Clinton she has performed quiet well.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Hope that helps.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Work well with others. Ted Kennedy worked well with other members, got things accomplished, worked across lines. A one man castle in congress just draws a pay check.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)I don't see much of the same spoken about Clinton, but I'm happy to be proved incorrect.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Veterans issues since that time. BTW, he is in the committee.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)This is the poll I've been looking for...the issue of which candidate can best get things done and bring real change in Washington. She has the experience, the political clout, and congressional support, and I'm happy to read that a majority of Democrats polled agree with me.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)as well as strong gains in the house. The US Supreme Court, too.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)In fact, the response was 100% in favor of not giving a FF. I conducted the poll and was the only respondent.
One of the worst things about our political/electoral process is all the focus on the horse race, like it's a sporting event with fans wearing team colors.
Seriously, shouldn't a mature discussion board focus on ideas, qualifications, and plans to fix what's wrong with our country?
These incessant polls (some in favor of Bernie, some in favor of Hillary) are worse than useless. Essentially, they are taunts in a partisan spectator sport.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)WILL she? Is the question everyone should be asking... and based on her record she won't.