2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPoll: Hillary Clinton bests Sanders as the Democrats' "change" candidate
Democratic primary voters think former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, not Sen. Bernie Sanders, is the candidate more likely to bring about change if elected president, according to a new CBS News/ New York Times poll.
Sixty-two percent of Democratic primary voters think Clinton, the current Democratic front runner who served in the Obama administration for four years, could bring about real change in the way things are done in Washington. Fifty-one percent half think Sanders could do the same.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-hillary-clinton-bests-sanders-as-the-democrats-change-candidate/
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)If you are not sure what that means let me know.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I can't hear your polls I do not like...
Wait until you finally discover you are in a minority of voters....
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)And will very likely win the nomination.
I can accept reality.
You on the other hand, not so sure.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I was the only one that was saying for weeks that Sanders was going to HAVE to proclaim he was a Democrat in public because he was't one....or the campaign was over.....to much ridicule from the Sanders supporters and it was even brushed off by Clinton Supporters...
Turns out I was absolutely right....
And you try to say "I" am unaware?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)be in tune with reality. In his quarter century in Congress, what great changes has Bernie brought about? Yes, he's done a few things, everyone's done a few things. But the agent for major change supporters like to think he is? No. No yet anyway.
Mark Leibovich in "This Town: Two Parties and a Funeral" quotes Washington Post editor Meg Greenfield in her memoir, "Washington": "Loners may be able to sell themselves electorally at home, but they cannot win in Washington, no matter how bad or good they are. Winning here means winning people over--sometimes by argument, sometimes by crafts, sometimes by obsequiousness and favors, sometimes by pressure and sometimes by a chest-thumping, ape-type show of strength that makes it seem prudent to get with the ape's program."
Let's face it, she's talking about the Bernies in D.C., the ones whose colleagues choose to endorse someone else by the hundreds. Of course, presidents are in a special and more powerful position, to put it mildly, but the fact that he'd never made a real impression on anyone until he took up Elizabeth Warren's banner may be showing in this poll.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)naming a Post Office in Vermont...and VA benefits. Wow ....way to stick your neck out for "change"
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)But that's just my opinion.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)be a more effective agent of change than Bernie. It doesn't mean you should support her. It's just a statement to discuss. Like, "Oh, yeah? Well, those people are just a bunch of dumb doo-doo-heads."
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Would you please ask my/our interlocutor to post his curriculum vitae or resume so us plebeians can decide how much weight we should assign his instruction.
Thank you in advance.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)If I need instruction in interpreting polls I assure you the denizens of this board would be the last group of people I would look. But thank you anyway.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I will use the same process that courts use to determine if an opinion qualifies to be an expert one.
Thank you in advance.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Should we all post our CV's on DU before speaking?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)-Bread and Circus
If you are not sure what that means let me know.
-Bread and Circus[
Only if they hold out themselves out as an expert.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Does it make you feel uncomfortable?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I am quite comfortable....comfy chair and my coffee...how about yourself?
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Do you want me to help you?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I love how Sanders supporters think they are smart...simply because they support Sanders!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)What happened to the old saw, "that self recommendation is the least effective form of praise" ?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)If you are not sure what that means let me know.
You post your education in the field of social science and social science research and I'll post mine, fair?
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)If you are not sure what that means let me know.
-Bread and Circus
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)What part of my first response would lead you to believe I wasn't being earnest? Do you not see I was giving you the benefit of the doubt?
And why after all this have you not addressed what I hinted at in the first place?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)IMHO, my thread upset you and you patronized me as a way to give voice to your uneasiness. That's okay. Your associates were upset at my posting of the thread too and lashed out in other ways, often with me as a target.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)That would have been a better question.
Which candidate is more likely to get things done?
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Of course, we know there are other factors at play.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)"a woman running the country? Hell Nah!"
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It is because they cannot refute the premise. It's what they do.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)She's been changing her positions to sound like Bernie & Elizabeth all year.... Too bad she'll 'evolve' back to her WallStreet friendly coroporatist ways if nominated. Also too bad the only thing she's stayed steady on is being a warhawk.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)she listens!
Oh and by the way....you must be talking about someone else.....because lord knows...you haven't read the public record.
http://ontheissues.org/Hillary_Clinton.htm
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Thank you.
NBachers
(17,120 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I was hoping some Bernie person would be a little more creative. Those memes are so old and time worn they aren't fun to read anymore.
Come on get a little original and spice this primary up some more. Obvious by the poll 61% do not believe those old memes.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Throw out bull shit talking points then tell somebody to defend against them
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)By the way, Dems dislike Corporatists and war hawks and flip floppers... the right wing, on the other hand, likes all those... since they benefit from them.
In other words, none of those detractions originate from the right wing. They come from dems who're critical of hillary... but please feel free to post any evidence you have to the contrary.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)You're the one being directly challenged here... not people.
Attacking the arguments being used against your candidate, and expecting to not be asked to justify those attacks leaves you with a very weak position.
You don't have to provide proof... but I wont take you seriously otherwise. If you're okay with that, then we've nothing more to discuss.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)it isn't somebody else's job to prove it is bull shit.
It deserves to be ignored
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)You're the one claiming that Hillary's well know status as a corporatist, war hawk and flip-flopper is nothing more than a meme. So, you're the one with the burden of proof. You are right, your comment does deserve to be ignored... but I thought I'd give you an opportunity to back up your statement.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)If that is your standard.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)how uninformed many are. Bernie's positions are the furthest from the status quo through any intellectual measure.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)positions being the furthest from the status quo, the poll seems to be less about the positions themselves than about which candidate will actually be able to implement the positions s/he espouses.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I don't like it, and apparently a lot of others feel the same way I do.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)They seem to treat me unpleasantly.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)
I suspect that many of the most grumpy ones were already like that to begin with. Perhaps Bernie's demeanor has made them feel more comfortable in displaying their true selves. It appears those social norms have been discarded, and one's normal internal-filters and self-control now play no role in their behavior.
So, with regard to many (not all) of them, he didn't "make" them that way, nor did he "change" them to be anything different that what was already lurking beneath the surface. Instead, he allowed them to be more comfortable with letting it all hang out and with an anything-goes approach.
I think it's interesting to note that so many of Bernie's supporters become disproportionately outraged when their behavior is returned in-kind. Even the mildest snark or humor is met with despair and overreactions and swarms of indignant self-righteous alerts. I often wonder exactly what it is they are expecting?
If that subset is expecting it to improve Bernie's poll numbers, or if they're expecting to change people's minds, then it's obviously not working very well. I wonder if they'll realize that and try to figure out what they could be doing differently that would produce better or more desirable results.
Many of them appear to be more interest in drawing battle-lines and digging trenches, instead of building bridges and opening lines of communication.
(PS: Don't let them get to you. I think you're great.) <3
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Thank you.
I believe a lot of what you discuss is a function of their absolute moral certitude...Folks who believe they have a monopoly on moral certitude make me uncomfortable. I am proudly heterodox and eschew all forms of orthodoxy. That's why I am a small (l) liberal.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)What will it be next week? His age, hair, like of blue shirts, the suits her wears or the fact he flies coach on the plane?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)And yes, since you brought it up ... his wash-and-wear polyester suits and un-ironed shirts and uncombed hair are also off-putting as well. It's not exactly the proper image that commands respect as a world leader. There's a certain level of gravitas that one should expect from a world leader, and their grooming and personal presentation is part of the entire picture. He's clearly lacking in that area.
justhanginon
(3,290 posts)If I want to see a curmudgeonly old man I just have to go and look in the mirror. Since I live alone, my occasional yelling doesn't bother anyone.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)WOW, just wow --- "curmudgeonly old man"....
justhanginon
(3,290 posts)of a sense of humor about aging. And please stay off my damn lawn!!!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Actually he IS old. Calling it "age discrimination" when someone points it out doesn't change that fact.
It's pretty clear that the objection here is that he comes across as a grumpy coot. That won't play well on the world stage. I'd find it to be a bit embarrassing.
Policy-wise, he scores within 2% points of Hillary in an online "who's your match" quiz I recently took. So in that regard, I have no big issues. It's just that I have serious doubts as to how someone with his surly demeanor would be able to be persuasive.
If everyone is laughing at him behind his back, and rolling their eyes when he walks off of Air Force One looking like he just woke up from a nap in his Lay-Z-Boy recliner, he won't be successful.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)And this....Well, WOW, just WOW --- maybe stepping away from the keyboard might be BEST for ya....as its obvious you have not been at DU long enough to do know might have went a wee bit over the top with this....
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)by private messages. What exactly were you expecting to happen on a public thread?
If people object to others participating, or if honest observations and difference of opinions are so distressing, then "stepping away from the keyboard" might instead be good advice for them.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #111)
Post removed
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)See post: 66. Now it's Bernie's "Demeanor"....
I did not harangue YOU for "jumping in" on a subthread that didn't originally include you. Why would I? What a silly thing for anyone to get so upset over!
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)On Fri Nov 13, 2015, 11:18 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Hypersensitive much?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=802545
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Age discrimination, no matter what our feelings, thoughts or ideas are about a candidate for POTUS or the cross-promotion of such there of, should not be tolerated at DU.
The two examples:
"If everyone is laughing at him behind his back, and rolling their eyes when he walks off of Air Force One looking like he just woke up from a nap in his Lay-Z-Boy recliner, he won't be successful."
And this one is worst, same thread and really below any standards for DU:
"And yes, since you brought it up ... his wash-and-wear polyester suits and un-ironed shirts and uncombed hair are also off-putting as well. It's not exactly the proper image that commands respect as a world leader. There's a certain level of gravitas that one should expect from a world leader, and their grooming and personal presentation is part of the entire picture. He's clearly lacking in that area."
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Nov 13, 2015, 11:29 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: While I abhor the argument, it needs push back, not hiding. The same can be said about Hillary's pants suits and her often appalling hair. Degrading statements about candidates based on appearances is below the belt but not grounds for a hide.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It is not "age discrimination" to point out the advanced age of someone might be a problem...not pointing it out with Reagen led to two years of a rudderless
Presidency.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Yes,this is all ageist bullshit designed to antagonize and disrupt, like virtually everything this person posts. MIRT needs to take a careful look at this poster.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I don't hide much, but that last paragraph fits the bill of hurtful and rude to more than just Bernie supporters.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)It was alerted, as it should have been. The end result was REAL CLOSE -- which should tell the poster something -- but its doubtful considering the tone overall in this thread. Sad to see. Real sad.....
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I need only look across the room. (A cranky coot, but I love him anyway.)
onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)she is the candidate best able to implement change are corporations? Is that what you are saying?
I'm afraid that your sense of reality and mine do not coincide.
onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)If you have evidence of any corporations doing so, you really should contact the Justice Department.
onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)If you mean changing her mind on issues. She'll make your head spin she flip-flops so fast!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Last edited Fri Nov 13, 2015, 10:46 AM - Edit history (1)
effectiveness by now. It is used so often and nobody is laughing not even you.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)She spins me right round baby right round.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)No matter who the candidate is, we need them to promise Change before global warming and WWIII do it for us.
gordyfl
(598 posts)Clinton resists change. Bernie Sanders is the only candidate in either party who seems to feel our politics shifting, perhaps because hes expected the change for so long.
His battle with Hillary could become epic, forcing not just her but the Democratic Party to choose between the middle class and the donor class; between corporate and democratic rule.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)one he is quickly losing...
She is not the one that had to BECOME a Democrat!
I guess Sanders moved huh?
retrowire
(10,345 posts)do you honestly believe this and why?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)next!
Rogue Democrat
(71 posts)Very interesting.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)yes I do...
you asked why....
I answered...polls..
next!
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)It's a question of willingness. Hillary cannot be trusted as an agent of change...unless that change is a march towards further privatization of public goods and services. Her record just doesn't show anything else.
moobu2
(4,822 posts)for the good guys.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)moobu2
(4,822 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts). . .for the good guys.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Bernie's been in Congress for nearly 25 years.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Has been dead since 1996 so, yeah, and, what does 2Pac has to do with Hillary Clinton run for President in 2015/16?
Robbins
(5,066 posts)Clinton the candiate of the establishment and insider candiate of change
On issues alone Bernie is break from both the Clinton/Obama corporistism and the republicans.
Bernie is the outsider who is consent.Clinton isn't.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)coyote
(1,561 posts)Because they know they cannot defend her on the issues, but she looks "presidential". I guess they are easily fooled by putting lipstick on a pig.
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)Changes all the time, depending on who she is talking to.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)...... they already know her name.
And obviously that's about it if they think she's gonna bring change.
Her entire popularity is based on name recognition. It's so obvious.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)With 418 unweighted and 431 weighted, anyone could make this poll say whatever they wanted it to say. This is another bad poll. The lack of a margin of error is a dead give away.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)So it looks like whoever participated in this poll wouldn't know change if it hit them in the face.
We're going to have to get used to the idea that the Democratic party doesn't necessarily represent the views liberal voters in this country.
If Clinton does win the nomination and her Presidency doesn't reflect the traditional Democratic Party perspective she's campaigning on we'll see a continuation in the decline of people registering as Democrats.
They'll have to get Debbie Wasserman Shultz to work has hard for the Democrats has she has for the Republicans in the name of saving the illusion of a two party system.
William769
(55,147 posts)Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)so generous to her campaign.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)This is so funny
DCBob
(24,689 posts)will help her to get things done. Which I wholeheartedly agree.