Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Clinton's vote is responsible for the Iraq War (Original Post) BainsBane Nov 2015 OP
Let's have an intra-party skirmish, or maybe let's not. L. Coyote Nov 2015 #1
Well, feel free to tell that to BainsBane Nov 2015 #2
Hillary supporter logic 101 AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #3
It is a perfect analogy BainsBane Nov 2015 #5
are you making a specific accusation? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #21
Oh looky, the Thought Police Android3.14 Nov 2015 #28
And where is it wrong or illogical? Do tell. Squinch Nov 2015 #27
HRC Bought And Paid For By The Oligarchs, Corporations and Banks cantbeserious Nov 2015 #79
It's so fucking stupid and pretzel. morningfog Nov 2015 #96
That would be the crime bill she vocally supported as Kelvin Mace Nov 2015 #4
The very crime bills --two of them-- BainsBane Nov 2015 #8
The war was the fault of anyone who voted for it, Kelvin Mace Nov 2015 #16
I disagree BainsBane Nov 2015 #19
Do you seriously wish me to ennumerate all of her bad votes and decisions? Kelvin Mace Nov 2015 #23
Yes, enumerate other bad votes besides the Iraq War BainsBane Nov 2015 #37
I didn't just say her "bad votes" Kelvin Mace Nov 2015 #98
Bad votes of Hillary Clinton include The Patriot Act Eric J in MN Nov 2015 #36
Thank you. nt BainsBane Nov 2015 #38
You're welcome. (NT) Eric J in MN Nov 2015 #55
She has more bad votes despite only being on Congress for 8 years jfern Nov 2015 #43
According to Hillary & her supporters, she is not to blame for anything negative that happens as a askew Nov 2015 #66
Both are true HassleCat Nov 2015 #6
My actual view BainsBane Nov 2015 #9
Your assertion 2 is not an outcome. Warren Stupidity Nov 2015 #17
That is one theory. Some feel, zero tolerance worked and others feel the largest reason askew Nov 2015 #67
They can feel whatever they want to feel. Warren Stupidity Nov 2015 #97
You forgot outcome #3: The violence against women act jeff47 Nov 2015 #39
That's some Republican - level false equivalence ibegurpard Nov 2015 #7
How on earth is it false? BainsBane Nov 2015 #11
Yea they act like only Hillary's votes counts treestar Nov 2015 #10
Not just that BainsBane Nov 2015 #13
Who else is running that voted on it? ibegurpard Nov 2015 #14
Not running for POTUS treestar Nov 2015 #33
Not to mention the majority of the American public with blood in their eye... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #22
I don't think anyone has claimed her vote alone Warren Stupidity Nov 2015 #12
People claim it every day BainsBane Nov 2015 #15
Again, she shares responsibility. Warren Stupidity Nov 2015 #18
Then those people are wrong, Kelvin Mace Nov 2015 #20
Did Bernie give a 19 minute speech... 99Forever Nov 2015 #24
I don't know about that, but I do know he voted for thewar in Afghanistan Sheepshank Nov 2015 #72
I see the OP gave no answer to my very simple and straight forward question. 99Forever Nov 2015 #75
We are all responsible for our choices. The powerful even more so. Are you trying to argue otherwise? Romulox Nov 2015 #25
So you accept that Clinton must take responsibility for her part in that travesty Android3.14 Nov 2015 #26
But BS marched with MLK so that gives him a get out of jail giftedgirl77 Nov 2015 #29
Something that no one has ever said. n/t Dawgs Nov 2015 #47
Right? The desperation would be amusing if wasn't so pathetic. beam me up scottie Nov 2015 #49
Bullshit giftedgirl77 Nov 2015 #58
You're right. Bernie Sanders should have voted against the Clinton Crime Bill. Eric J in MN Nov 2015 #30
Correct me if I'm wrong floriduck Nov 2015 #81
She donated those donations to charity after people protested. Eric J in MN Nov 2015 #88
Thanks. Good logic. riversedge Nov 2015 #31
she is most definitely a part of the problem, jkbRN Nov 2015 #32
So having the highest prison population in the world is no longer a concern? BainsBane Nov 2015 #44
Kick & highly recommended! William769 Nov 2015 #34
Though I opposed it, I can list some good outcomes from Bill Clinton's Crime Bill. bvar22 Nov 2015 #35
That is an excellent point. I'd love to see a Hillary supporter answer that question. askew Nov 2015 #68
I can! JonLeibowitz Nov 2015 #89
We should not measure with a double standard Nonhlanhla Nov 2015 #40
The vote FOR the Iraq War was not complex. bvar22 Nov 2015 #71
Was the Violence Against Women Act attached to the Iraq war vote? jeff47 Nov 2015 #41
Well, that makes it okay BainsBane Nov 2015 #42
Aren't you the one who talks about having to compromise? jeff47 Nov 2015 #50
My comment was not about you personally BainsBane Nov 2015 #57
No kidding, there'd be endless ops about how he hates women. beam me up scottie Nov 2015 #48
Bernie opposed the crime bill but finally voted for it because of the VAW act and AW ban: beam me up scottie Nov 2015 #45
Perfect... Just PERFECT!!! bvar22 Nov 2015 #46
That's Clinton supporter logic for you. n/t Dawgs Nov 2015 #52
Yep. Rogue Democrat Nov 2015 #63
At least the OP acknowledges the awfulness of Hillary's Iraq war vote. reformist2 Nov 2015 #51
For crying out loud! It seems as if more people asjr Nov 2015 #53
Out of ALL the Democrats running for President in 2016, bvar22 Nov 2015 #54
They are helping to rewrite history for Bush and the GOP. JoePhilly Nov 2015 #56
By George, I think you have nailed it. Thanks. asjr Nov 2015 #59
It wouldn't be an issue if Hillary wasn't a candidate for POTUS Fumesucker Nov 2015 #60
I disagree. bvar22 Nov 2015 #64
Sanders made an impassioned speech in the senate in favor of incarcerating millions? nt Bonobo Nov 2015 #61
which crime bills caused the mass incarceration of millions? Vattel Nov 2015 #62
Hillary owns that crime bill as well. She campaigned for it and took credit for it up until 2015. askew Nov 2015 #65
Naturally Bernie isn't responsible for his own votes BainsBane Nov 2015 #69
Of course, Bernie is, but so is Hillary. She owns that bill just as much. askew Nov 2015 #70
No, but two fuckups are more than one fuckup. Warren DeMontague Nov 2015 #91
Clinton's vote is only partly responsible for the Iraq War. She could have been courageous... Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #73
She is partially responsible AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #74
It Is Increasingly Clear That HRC Must Withdraw From The 2016 Election For Her Role As A Neocon cantbeserious Nov 2015 #76
Clear to whom? BainsBane Nov 2015 #77
Clear To All Those That Voted Against Neocons In Prior Elections cantbeserious Nov 2015 #78
Show some data to support your claim that opinion is widely held BainsBane Nov 2015 #84
Jury Results oneshooter Nov 2015 #85
sad riversedge Nov 2015 #87
Jury results: 6 to 1, leave it alone. Divernan Nov 2015 #86
HRC's vote was only one among many. Bush and Cheney are the responsible ones. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #80
The take-home message is that Hillary is not a leader, not willing to stick her neck out. reformist2 Nov 2015 #83
Or, Bernie is responsible for Sandyhook and Colorado ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #82
If (something no one has said) then (intended as unpalatable conclusion) Warren DeMontague Nov 2015 #90
Of ALL the members of the Senate in 2002, Hillary should have known Bush was peddling a pack of lies Dems to Win Nov 2015 #92
Apropos analogy Sheepshank Nov 2015 #93
A non sequitur statement Fearless Nov 2015 #94
They're so desperate. Cha Nov 2015 #95

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
1. Let's have an intra-party skirmish, or maybe let's not.
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:07 PM
Nov 2015

[center]Better let's not. Let's talk about the clown car instead.

Sometimes things can be summed up in just two words.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
2. Well, feel free to tell that to
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:09 PM
Nov 2015

any of the dozens of threads in GD-P skewering Hillary Clinton right now. I await your criticism in those threads.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
5. It is a perfect analogy
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:12 PM
Nov 2015


If a single vote is responsible for all the victims of war, then a single vote is likewise responsible for all the incarceration that resulted from those crime bills. Clearly you have a problem with consistent standards.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
8. The very crime bills --two of them--
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:14 PM
Nov 2015

That Bernie voted for. But we all know the Iraq War was Laura Bush's fault, not W's or Hillary's, so the crime bill is not the responsibility of the congressmen who voted for it but the First Lady.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
16. The war was the fault of anyone who voted for it,
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:18 PM
Nov 2015

or advocated for it it in any way. That would include Laura Bush. The New York Times (Judy Miller), etc.

Sanders claimed that he voted for the bill to support the attached rider supporting victims of domestic violence.

Be that as it may, he voted for it, and is, by my definition, responsible for all that came with it.

The difference between him and HRC, is that he doesn't that many bad votes/decisions to atone for.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
19. I disagree
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:22 PM
Nov 2015

His bad votes: 5 times voting against the Brady Bill; votes for immunity for gun corporations; voting to allow loaded guns in National Parks; other similar votes allowing guns in other federal spaces; voting against the Amber Alert; voting against Immigration reform; voting for the Minutemen; voting for the Wall; voting for and continuing to support the boondoggle of $800 billion to Lockheed-Martin for the F-35.

How many bad votes does Clinton have?

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
23. Do you seriously wish me to ennumerate all of her bad votes and decisions?
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:27 PM
Nov 2015

You are probably not going to like the results. Also, if I do give you a list that proves more death, destruction and waste of money, will it affect your view?

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
98. I didn't just say her "bad votes"
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:11 AM
Nov 2015

I said bad decisions and vocal support. I hold people responsible for advocating for the war, not just voting for it. So, the question is do you wish me to enumerate all of her bad decisions as well as bad votes?

Also, there was my second question. Will it really matter to you if I do?

I really don't understand why HRC supporters have their knickers in a twist. HRC is the establishment candidate. The DNC and Wall Street will see to it she wins the nomination. After she is elected, she will shift back to her usual modus operandi and sacrifice those who believe she is a genuine "progressive" on the altar of "pragmatism" and "bi-partisanship". And when called on it, her supporters will claim it is all part of an elaborate 11 dimensional chess plan that is really clever and she only seems to be selling us out.

Now with the attacks in Paris we can expect her to support the next endless war that will squanders hundreds of thousands/millions of lives and another trillion dollars that's always available for killing, but never available to build schools, roads, bridges or provide needed care for the poor.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
36. Bad votes of Hillary Clinton include The Patriot Act
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 04:53 PM
Nov 2015

and the 2001 Bankruptcy Bill.

She also co-sponsored an anti-flag burning law which didn't get a roll call vote.

askew

(1,464 posts)
66. According to Hillary & her supporters, she is not to blame for anything negative that happens as a
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:35 PM
Nov 2015

result of her actions. Hillary "the buck stops over there somewhere" Clinton is how I think of her.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
6. Both are true
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:12 PM
Nov 2015

Members of congress who voted for the crime bills are responsible for the outcomes, which include (1) a whole lot more people locked up, and (2) a significant drop in crime. Members of congress who voted for the Iraq war are responsible for the outcomes, which include (1) converting Iraq into a peaceful democracy with no loss of life, and (2) drastic weight gain by our solders from eating all the candy thrown at them by grateful Iraqis. In each case, gotta take the good with the bad, I guess.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
9. My actual view
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:15 PM
Nov 2015

Is that they are responsible for their part in the process, their votes that contributed to it. That is not the same is it being entirely their fault, as many have insisted is the case for Clinton and the war, while likewise holding her responsible for the crime bills that Bernie voted for.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
17. Your assertion 2 is not an outcome.
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:20 PM
Nov 2015

Certainly draconian policies filled out prisons. However demographics dropped the crime rate, as evidenced by similar stats from countries that did not go down the lock em up and throw away the key route.

askew

(1,464 posts)
67. That is one theory. Some feel, zero tolerance worked and others feel the largest reason
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:38 PM
Nov 2015

drop in crime is the decrease in lead paint in poor neighborhoods. Lead intake as a child changes the way the brain develops and can lead to impulse control issues, etc.

There are a lot of theories as to why the crime rate dropped but none of them have been proven to be the sole reason.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
39. You forgot outcome #3: The violence against women act
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 05:05 PM
Nov 2015

It was contained in those evil, terrible, no good crime bills.

The vote for the Iraq war was only about one thing: Invading Iraq.
The vote on the crime bill was about everything in the omnibus legislation. Some of it sucked, some of it was good.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
10. Yea they act like only Hillary's votes counts
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:15 PM
Nov 2015

not the rest of Congress, Bush, or the voters of that time. It is judging people's action in 2002-3 by the situation now.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
13. Not just that
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:17 PM
Nov 2015

Clinton is responsible for the mass incarceration from the crime bills too, even though Bernie voted for them. But somehow he didn't really mean his two votes, so that's okay. Or something similarly incomprehensible.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
33. Not running for POTUS
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 04:26 PM
Nov 2015

does not make others not part of what they were part of. That includes the entire country. Anyone who remembers the couple of years after 911 knows it was a different time and judging people then by what the situation is now is wrong.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
12. I don't think anyone has claimed her vote alone
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:17 PM
Nov 2015

was responsible.

Your op is nonsense. However Clinton should at least make it clear that her vote was a terrible mistake and that she bears some responsibility for the disaster that ensued. And no, blaming her vote on bad information doesn't cut it.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
15. People claim it every day
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:18 PM
Nov 2015

They post pictures of the fallen in Iraq and say she killed them. Seriously.

I'm not defending her vote. I haven't, and I won't. What I am doing is demonstrating the double standard that reigns around here.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
20. Then those people are wrong,
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:23 PM
Nov 2015

since she didn't literally"kill them". However, to borrow a Biblical metaphor, "the blood is on her hands", i.e. she bears responsibility for their deaths,

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
72. I don't know about that, but I do know he voted for thewar in Afghanistan
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:57 PM
Nov 2015

And the fund he war in Iraq.

There is plenty of blame to pin in sanders too.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
75. I see the OP gave no answer to my very simple and straight forward question.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:36 PM
Nov 2015

I expected as much.

All shit stirrer, no real substance.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
25. We are all responsible for our choices. The powerful even more so. Are you trying to argue otherwise?
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:32 PM
Nov 2015
 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
26. So you accept that Clinton must take responsibility for her part in that travesty
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:33 PM
Nov 2015

Good to see.

And what was Hillary supporting at the time Bernie voted for that crime bill? It was Bill Clinton's bill, so i would guess she was supporting the mass incarceration as well.

Your support of HRC makes no sense, but thank you for playing.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
30. You're right. Bernie Sanders should have voted against the Clinton Crime Bill.
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:45 PM
Nov 2015

When a Rep has to decide on a large bill with things he like and things he dislikes, it may be difficult to choose. Sanders chose wrong that time. He shares responsibility for mass incarceration.

Looking to the future however, Bernie Sanders is advocating the biggest criminal justice reform: making marijuana legal under federal law.

He's also promised that when he's president, the US won't have the most prisoners in the world. None of the other candidates have promised that.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
81. Correct me if I'm wrong
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:51 PM
Nov 2015

but doesn't Hill get contributions from the private prison corporations? I thought I saw that before.

jkbRN

(850 posts)
32. she is most definitely a part of the problem,
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 04:21 PM
Nov 2015

and if you want to be commander in chief, that IS a BIG problem that many people take issue with. GET. OVER. IT.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
44. So having the highest prison population in the world is no longer a concern?
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 05:24 PM
Nov 2015

Is that your claim?
The point is intellectual consistency, and you refuse to as much as engage with the question.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
35. Though I opposed it, I can list some good outcomes from Bill Clinton's Crime Bill.
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 04:43 PM
Nov 2015

Can you name ANY good outcomes from the Iraq War?

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
40. We should not measure with a double standard
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 05:06 PM
Nov 2015

I don't like Bernie's votes on the crime bill but I can see why he voted for it. These bills are always more complex and a vote for or against it is never a simple matter.

But the same is true of Hillary's vote for the war. I don't like her vote, but if you listen to what she said then as well as later, it becomes clear that she did not actually want to go to war. She was assured by people like Chuck Hagel that the administration would first let the UN inspectors do their job and only go to war as last resort. Here is a nice summary from an old Dailykos article"
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/5/22/1386838/-Hillary-Clinton-Never-Supported-the-Bush-Cheney-Invasion-of-Iraq

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
71. The vote FOR the Iraq War was not complex.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:54 PM
Nov 2015

There was a handful of laughably fabricated "evidence",
and cartoon drawings used by Powell at the UN to "Prove" Saddam had WMD...
Cartoon Drawings of (beat war drum here) MOBILE WEAPONS LABS!!!!!
Not photographs...but real cartoon drawings!!!

I laughed so hard snot came out my nose.
I couldn't wait to get on DU so we could all laugh together,
but instead, I found a steady stream of, "Well. He convinced me" posts,
copied from the Talking Heads who were "IN" on the deal.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
41. Was the Violence Against Women Act attached to the Iraq war vote?
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 05:06 PM
Nov 2015

No?

Huh....almost like the Iraq war vote was only about invading Iraq, whereas those evil, terrible crime bills contained a lot more than one issue.

Btw, if Sanders had voted "No", we'd have a dozen posts from you about how Sanders hates women for voting against the VAWA.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
42. Well, that makes it okay
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 05:21 PM
Nov 2015

He's only responsible for the good stuff, not the bad. All the bad stuff is Clinton's fault anyway.

Either a candidate is responsible for the outcome of his votes or not. You all don't even make an effort to apply any kind of consistent standard.

Violence against women. I'm touched that people suddenly decide that's important, albeit retrospectively. It would have been nice if folks were thinking about justifying Bernie's votes when I was being attacked for having the nerve to post out the issue because to even discuss it in public, I was told, was sexist and man-hating. And when I pointed out that victim blaming of battered women was hurtful, I got a hide for "bullying." I then got a subsequent hide for posting the jury results. I learned I was not allowed to discuss such issues since they violate community standards, but now I'm told it's so important that it justifies the rise of the carceral state. My, how times do change. I guess I need to learn that if I am to raise concerns about women's lives, it needs to be in the context of promoting the career of a great man.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
50. Aren't you the one who talks about having to compromise?
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 05:46 PM
Nov 2015
He's only responsible for the good stuff, not the bad

No, he's responsible for deciding that the good stuff outweighed the bad.

Either a candidate is responsible for the outcome of his votes or not. You all don't even make an effort to apply any kind of consistent standard.

Go ahead and cite the "good stuff" from the Iraq war vote. Then we can decide if it outweighs the bad.

"Sanders voters demand purity" is a talking point from Clinton supporters. We're well aware that legislative "sausage making" is far from ideal. So instead we have to base our evaluations on what the candidates based their votes on - what did they say at the time for why they voted a particular way. Sanders cited the positive elements in those bills, such as the VAWA.

Clinton obviously couldn't vote on the bills, but her public statements from the time and "It Takes a Village" praise the "tough on crime" aspects, as well as things like the VAWA.

As an example of the inverse, the people attacking Sanders for voting against Brady - his decision to vote against it had specific reasons behind it. That is instead characterized as being "a gun nut".

The AUMF for Iraq did not have any other issues attached. So one can't claim there was "good" in the bill that outweighed the "bad".

I'm touched that people suddenly decide that's important, albeit retrospectively.

Considering this is the first time you and I have talked about VAWA or domestic violence in general, as far as I know, you have no clue what I think about it. But thanks for the attack! I really appreciate being held responsible for everything you don't like.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
57. My comment was not about you personally
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 06:30 PM
Nov 2015

but my experience talking about violence against women on this site. Suddenly everyone is eager to champion that issue because it helps them explain away Sanders votes on the crime bills.

We have talked about prostitution, which is accompanied by a great deal of violence and enslavement of women. We did not agree on the issue. I don't recall enough specifics about our conversation, but I do know that the general response by members here is that the consumer's rights and desires came first. Human trafficking and battery, I was told, were already illegal, so there was no need to consider it in the equation that dictated the male bourgeoisie's desire to purchase sex took priority. Yet now, a rider to a bill that dealt with violence against women is more important that the crime bill and the resulting carceral state (except when it can be blamed on the evil First Lady). You'll have to forgive me for suffering from vertigo from all the changes.

Clinton has her justifications for her war vote as well. She insists the vote was to enable the Bush administration to exert greater influence with Iraq through the UN and avoid war. I will not justify it, however. I protested that war and continue to object to it and votes that enabled it, including Sanders many subsequent votes funding that war effort. However, it is clear that you are more than willing to consider Sanders reasons for his bad votes and not at all interested in Clinton's.

Then of course we have his vote for immunity for gun corporations, for which there is no good, unless of course one takes the view that moar guns and unfettered profits for the multi-billion dollar gun industry is good.

Then there are his votes for the Minutemen, the Wall, and against Immigration reform. Against the Amber Alert and his votes and continued and ongoing support for $800billion in corporate welfare for Lockheed Martin for the F-35.

Then of course we have his efforts to point to the mentally ill as responsible for gun violence, despite the fact that CDC data shows that the mentally ill are in fact less likely to commit violence than the general population. But if we have to create a second-class rank of citizenship to protect the gun lobby, that's all okay. Those are good corporations. Like Lockheed-Martin they profit from murder, which makes them so much better than Wall Street.

But Bernie is not responsible for the results of any of his votes. Instead, a woman who was First Lady at the time was responsible because Bernie is never responsible for anything that is bad, including his own votes. The story gets tiresome and it becomes clear that issues are the least of what matters.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
48. No kidding, there'd be endless ops about how he hates women.
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 05:41 PM
Nov 2015

Her vote for war cannot be defended, this is just another attempt to deflect.


beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
45. Bernie opposed the crime bill but finally voted for it because of the VAW act and AW ban:
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 05:25 PM
Nov 2015
Sanders opposed the Violent Crime Prevention Act of 1991 during his first year in the U.S. House of Representatives.

"All over the industrialized world now, countries are saying, ‘let us put an end to state murder, let us stop capital punishment’," Sanders said in a 1991 speech on the House floor. "But here what we’re talking about is more and more capital punishment."

The bill, which included provisions to authorize the death penalty as appropriate punishment for crimes involving the murder of a law enforcement officer, terrorism and drug trafficking, never reached the desk of President George H.W. Bush.

In 1994, however, Sanders voted in favor of the final version of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, a bill that expanded the federal death penalty. Sanders had voted for an amendment to the bill that would have replaced all federal death sentences with life in prison. Even though the amendment failed, Sanders still voted for the larger crime bill.

A spokesman for Sanders said he voted for the bill "because it included the Violence Against Women Act and the ban on certain assault weapons."

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/sep/02/viral-image/where-do-hillary-clinton-and-bernie-sanders-stand-/



And Bernie didn't lie about anything to get the bill passed like Hillary did when she claimed that Saddam was harboring al Qaeda:

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members...

It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well, effects American security.

This is a very difficult vote, this is probably the hardest decision I've ever had to make. Any vote that might lead to war should be hard, but I cast it with conviction."



Trying to defend her vote by claiming a vote for Clinton's crime bill is comparable to an illegal war that killed thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis is despicable.


bvar22

(39,909 posts)
46. Perfect... Just PERFECT!!!
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 05:28 PM
Nov 2015

Here we have Bernie Sanders, voting with the Majority of Democrats, supporting a Democratic President's Agenda, and taking flack from supposed DEMOCRATS on a DEMOCRATIC site.

OTOH, we have Hillary voting AGAINST the Majority of Democrats to support a Republican President's Bill (possibly the WORST Bill in American History), but some here want to make Bernie the bad guy.

Not Working.

asjr

(10,479 posts)
53. For crying out loud! It seems as if more people
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 05:59 PM
Nov 2015

would blame Hillary Clinton for the Iraq war than those who caused it. Her Iraq vote comes up all the time as if no one else voted for it. That is stretching it when she was a senator.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
54. Out of ALL the Democrats running for President in 2016,
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 06:06 PM
Nov 2015

which one voted AGAINST the Democratic MAJORITY to support a REPUBLICAN President's WAR?
The optional Cheer Leading for the Republican WAR and Shock & Awe are inexcusable.
THAT makes it significant.
She hasn't gotten any smarter.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
56. They are helping to rewrite history for Bush and the GOP.
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 06:13 PM
Nov 2015

Whether intentional or not, that is what they are really doing.

Congress gave Bush the authority to go to war, if necessary. The goal was to get Saddam to allow the inspectors back in. That worked. Saddam let the inspectors back in a month later. Bush meanwhile, abuse the power he was given.

Some on the left hate Hillary so much, they'd rather give Bush cover, and blame Hillary.

I don't trust them. They are either intentionally helping to rewrite the history, or they aren't sharp enough to know that's what they're doing.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
60. It wouldn't be an issue if Hillary wasn't a candidate for POTUS
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 10:14 PM
Nov 2015

It's big part of her considerable baggage train and people are going to talk about it.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
64. I disagree.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:14 PM
Nov 2015

That vote against the Democratic Majority to align herself with the Republicans to help a Republican President start and illegal and immoral WAR the killed near a MILLION INNOCENTS will follow her FOREVER.

askew

(1,464 posts)
65. Hillary owns that crime bill as well. She campaigned for it and took credit for it up until 2015.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:33 PM
Nov 2015

She also wanted to make it more draconian by putting in harsher sentencing, etc.

And yes, Hillary owns the Iraq War. She had an opportunity to stand up and lead with principle to do the right thing. And instead, she chose to support an unjust and unnecessary war that destabilized an entire region and created the chaos that ISIS needed to rise.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
69. Naturally Bernie isn't responsible for his own votes
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:07 PM
Nov 2015

or what results from them. Those too are Clinton's fault.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
73. Clinton's vote is only partly responsible for the Iraq War. She could have been courageous...
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:12 PM
Nov 2015

but instead she was a coward and caved.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
77. Clear to whom?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:42 PM
Nov 2015

The ever shrinking number of people who support Sanders? She has an enormous lead in the polls. It is pretty astounding that you feel your own views should take precedence over the democratic choices of the vast majority of Americans, but then that is what self-entitlement is all about.

It would be nice if you bothered to figure out what the term neocon actually means. I won't hold my breath.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
84. Show some data to support your claim that opinion is widely held
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:01 PM
Nov 2015

Of course you can't. You merely assume your own views are universal and absolute.

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
85. Jury Results
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:15 PM
Nov 2015

On Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:10 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

It Is Increasingly Clear That HRC Must Withdraw From The 2016 Election For Her Role As A Neocon
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=806619

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Calling a Democrat a "Neocon" is entirely inappropriate.

This member has been posting this same thing in several threads on DU today. The one below was hidden by a 6-1 vote. Please hide this one too.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027345320#post1

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:13 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Personal opinions are still allowed on DU
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I wouldn't say she's a neocon but a kissing cousin neolib.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: You're kidding, right?
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
86. Jury results: 6 to 1, leave it alone.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:17 PM
Nov 2015

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Calling a Democrat a "Neocon" is entirely inappropriate.

This member has been posting this same thing in several threads on DU today. The one below was hidden by a 6-1 vote. Please hide this one too.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027345320#post1

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:13 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Personal opinions are still allowed on DU
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I wouldn't say she's a neocon but a kissing cousin neolib.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: You're kidding, right?
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
80. HRC's vote was only one among many. Bush and Cheney are the responsible ones.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:46 PM
Nov 2015

The rest were enablers.

Any that assign blame to HRC are stretching, to say the least.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
90. If (something no one has said) then (intended as unpalatable conclusion)
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:52 PM
Nov 2015

Obviously her vote alone wasn't responsible for the Iraq War, derp.

It is still a stain on her record. The largest foreign policy clusterfuck since Vietnam.

Sanders should be called to account for bad votes, too, however unlike HRC he is directly addressing a major component of mass incarceration by calling the War on Drugs a failure and standing up for the descheduling of marijuana, a long-overdue step towards ending the filling of prisons with non-violent drug offenders.

 

Dems to Win

(2,161 posts)
92. Of ALL the members of the Senate in 2002, Hillary should have known Bush was peddling a pack of lies
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 06:34 PM
Nov 2015

Hillary is not solely responsible for the Iraq War, but she is the only Democrat who voted for the war who is asking for my vote to be president.

Hillary was 'co-president' from 1993-2000, when the US bombed Iraq weekly or monthly to enforce the no-fly zones enacted after the first Iraq War. The Clinton White House enforced crippling sanctions on Iraq the whole time. It made not a bit of sense that Iraq had an active weapons of mass destruction program when the country couldn't even get spare parts to repair their sewage treatment plants. Never for an instant did I, and the millions marching against the war, believe Iraq could possibly be a danger to the US after the destruction of the First Iraq War and subsequent bombings and sanctions.

It never made a bit of sense that secular Saddam, known for brutally repressing the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood, had anything to do with Al Qeada and 9/11. Not for a single moment did I, or the millions of others marching in the streets, believe Saddam had anything to do with 9/11. Hillary should have known this, too.

If she is smart and competent and the co-president during her husband's term, she would have been leading the charge for NO votes on the IWR. Instead, she voted yes and authorized the epic travesty of the Iraq War and all that followed, the biggest mistake the US has made during my lifetime.

Without the Iraq War, there would have been no Al Queda in Iraq, no ISIS, no Paris attacks.

I hope Bernie and Martin bluntly point out her poor judgement and the tragic consequences of that poor decision tonight.

Bernie's responsible for some votes I disagree with, too. I wish Rep. Barbara Lee was running for president. She was right to vote NO on the Afghanistan War, too, which has had no good results, either. But at least Bernie voted NO on one of the 2 biggest manmade disasters of my lifetime, one that I and many others KNEW would be an epic disaster AT THE TIME.

Hillary's IWR vote is inexcusable and unforgivable, imho. And the consequences have been unquestionably horrific.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If Clinton's vote is resp...