2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumComplaining about Superdelegates at this point is kinda sad.
Everybody knew the rules before the game started. Bernie knew the rules before he finally became a member of the team.
That's like complaining that the free throw line is too close during the NBA finals.
It's too late for that.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)No excuse.
edited to add: Superdelegates suck.
brooklynite
(94,595 posts)...each individual Superdelegate had to be wooed, or decided to support Clinton on their own.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)And it is a house anyone can join because it belongs to all the members!
plus5mace
(140 posts)If Bernie, or anyone else, gets more actual delegates than Hillary, super-delegates will flip as they did for Obama. Winning candidates suddenly find themselves very popular with other politicians.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Because they aren't willing to discuss issues.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Then you better believe there will be hell to pay. Right now they aren't an issue. They need to reflect the will of the voters in general.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)But DWS is that stupid...
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Super Delegates have never determined the outcome of a primary and would only do so if it came down to a convention floor vote. I guarantee you, if by some magical miracle Sanders actually won more state delegates that Hillary (about a 0.0000000000000001% chance), the super delegates would switch sides so fast it would make your head spin.
In fact, 50 did so when it became clear Obama was going to win the nomination in 2008.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)the supers will support the will of the people. i don't see what all the hoopla is about honestly.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)and no candidate has the required 50%+1 delegates chosen in the primaries, then the super delegates will make the final decision.
In essence, they will serve to break what would really be a tie.
I cannot deny that this produces another hurdle for Sanders. He must clearly win and that's an almost impossible bar, because in anything resembling a tie, Hillary will come out on top.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)it won't be that close. if bernie wins, it will be because a tide turns and he will win with enough margin. i could be really wrong, just a gut feeling.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I think it shows she learned from '08. Obama and his team were extremely strong networkers. It's damn near all they did for a bit and it's still going on today. How aggressive he was in that area paid off big. Much of that has transferred over to Clinton. It's been a big part of her teams focus.
Karma13612
(4,552 posts)NPR announced that Hillary has now secured over 50% of the superdelegate's support and commitments.
Basically, it was just a dog whistle tactic. For those not fully aware of the superdelegate arrangement, many listeners are thinking that Hillary has sewn up the nomination. It's a foregone conclusion.
And that always sets in motion the feeling that you should vote for the winner, before the winner is even decided.
So, it's a tricky little way to get more people thinking that they might as well vote for Hillary in the primaries because she is already in the lead with superdelegates.
A self-fulfilling prophecy.
Once again, NPR is playing games.
Darn it.
Cha
(297,304 posts)else's fault but his.