2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSo it's Supply Side Warhawk Hillary now? I guess Progressive Clinton is so "last week."
Well a few weeks ago it was Hillary the Progressive.
This week she's out criticizing taxes to pay for liberal social programs. And rattling the sabres now that the nation's is currently in Terror24/7 mode (at least for now).
Amazing how that "I'm the real progressive" stuff got shed. So what's on the plate next week in the ever-shifting message?
MisterP
(23,730 posts)that's how it works, Armstead
ruffburr
(1,190 posts)Changes her positions more often than she changes her pant suits, She is a Third Way Democrat not a Progressive by any stretch of the imagination.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)No up/down, backwards/forwards, left/right, higher/lower.
It adapts to different environments.
Sometimes it's wrong.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)IIRC they had to pry him off the chambermaids a lot, too
WillyT
(72,631 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)She's been lying. Now the phony populist is gone
The ge might be tough without the bernistas, and she and her mob have gone to great lengths to insult them, belittle them, and lie to and about them. Interesting times.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Ino
(3,366 posts)always chasing a trend, isn't she? A true leader!
BainsBane
(53,056 posts)Good God.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Let's just say she is riding the anti-tax bandwagon and using the GOP tactic of "no taxes are good" and exploiting the fear of that to and distort the perception and scuttle valid social programs.
BainsBane
(53,056 posts)is so far beyond Clinton's it's not even funny. And you just admitted your claim about supply side was false.
She isn't scuttling social programs. She proposes raising taxes on the wealthy and cutting them for the poor and lower-middle class. WTF is this even about?
If you're talking about Syria, Bernie was totally on board with that during the debates. They both support coalition-based military intervention.
BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)I actually disagree with making such a blanket statement, but it is what it is.
The criticism on this issue is borne out of willful ignorance, and indicates a desire to believe the worst, regardless of the evidence. It's the kind of fact-free adherence to ideology that we rightfully criticize on the other side. And by the other side, I mean the Republicans, not other Democrats, in case anyone forgot.
What a damn cesspool this place has become.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)follow Bernie to the left? Guess she took it seriously for whatever reason. Those guys are SO afraid of the Left, going after Warren, Bernie, VOTERS even, coming out of the shadows lately to attack anyone who DARES to oppose their right wing policies and getting slapped down btw.
They sound so petulant, so arrogant, so nasty when they do emerge from their Wall St funded Mansions to lecture the 'little people' and to admonish their candidates of choice should they move even slightly from the right, just a teeny bit.
Saw their admonishment to Hillary recently. It sounded like a warning. When they did it to Elizabeth Warren she more or less told them to go 'stuff it'.
Hillary otoh, seems to be doing as they told her.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Her moral compass is spinning like she's in the Bermuda triangle
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)3, 2, 1....
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)An act of desperation.
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)will the real HC please bow out?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 21, 2015, 07:27 PM - Edit history (1)
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)that nobody will watch the next debate(s), and feels totally
as the permanent front runner.
Thus she can run already all the way to the middle.
When Bernie gets closer in his challenge, then she
might reconsider.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)The only thing she's been in the middle of in the last 25 years is a major sh*t storm of one kind or another.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)If Hillary wins, TEAM BLUE wins!!! What's a Democrat, anyway... or a liberal for that matter. All that matters is that our side wins!!!
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)Depends on what "our side" is.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)I mean, I'm used to Republicans beating the drums for war - that's what they do.
But seeing Democrats beating the drums just because our guy (or gal) is president, that's going to be a lot more difficult to deal with...
DianeK
(975 posts)chama, chama, chama chameleon!
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Because they cut into her military defense budget plans.
Evidently she wants pyramids built for her in the deserts of Nevada, too.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)dive into the trenches and join the brigade! We can draft son's and daughters of rich politicians and corporatists first. I'm sure no one will object. They are surely eager to dig rifle pits, hump ammo and supplies into forbidding areas, watch their friends die and be part of one burial detail after another. Yeah rah, rah, go team. My god is bigger and better than their God...
BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)And I see this thread, and every comment is full of unvarnished hate for Clinton.
What the heck has happened to this place?
ismnotwasm
(42,007 posts)And people like to pretend Democrats and Republicans are the same, and only Sanders can save us. Or something.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)If you haven't been here for a week or so then perhaps you missed it when Hillary called for a ground war against ISIS? She's also come out against single payer health care and has actively criticized the idea on the grounds that, "the middle class doesn't need a tax hike." This is the stuff that Republicans campaign on.
BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)Even the OP has said that this post is hyperbole.
I'm not so much talking about the positions (on which I would argue, but more pleasantly-- among other things, to say she called for an American ground war against ISIS is a huge exaggeration). But in this thread, there is a reference to Orwell's 1984, someone calling her a Chimera, a juvenile gif of a spinning weathervane, a comparison to Sybil, a reference to someone being inbred, among other things.
That's not pointing out facts-- that's outright hatred.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)Maybe it's all harmless. It's just depressing to read on a board supposedly aimed at talking about Democratic issues and candidates.
I'd like to read mostly positive posts about our candidates. All of this pie-flinging makes me grumpy. Maybe it's time for another week's break.