2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumToday's BernieBash™ meme: "Bernie is a war-mongering right-wing loon..."
"Bernie is a war-mongering right-wing loon, who panders to everyone"
What next? He used to be FLOTUS?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Surely you can back up your quote with a link.
MineralMan
(146,345 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)There it is!
Hekate
(90,956 posts)cheapdate
(3,811 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)In fact, I see no mention of war.
You wouldn't be lying, would you?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)then discussion is pointless.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)We used to not do that. I liked that better.
Of course to claim that is a "meme" is ridiculous, but saying it is will stoke the flames and that's the point, I guess
MADem
(135,425 posts)I think the schtick is overused.
Or it could be--like with this effort--that the material is just not very good.
You know what I just thought about?
Vanilla Ice was really cool for a brief and shining moment...and then he wasn't. He packed 'em in at massive concerts, and then he couldn't fill the corner bar in his own neighborhood.
Not sure why that came to mind, but I'll bet there's a relationship there, somewhere, somehow.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)But it's good to get this insight from you.
PatrickforO
(14,602 posts)Manny's become a giant Onion...
pnwmom
(109,021 posts)Well, some of us think that's fine and others don't.
Lancero
(3,017 posts)And some people what to bring politics back to the old days, where despite ideological differences both sides were willing to work together in a attempt to better the nation.
I agree with you - Some of us think that's fine, and others don't.
Still though, if he can make some Republicans open their eyes to how much the party is screwing them, and get them to embrace more Democratic values - Be they moderate or progressive - wouldn't that be a good thing? Fewer Republican voters, more Democratic voters. I consider getting more Democratic voters to be a fine thing, but I suppose that others here don't.
pnwmom
(109,021 posts)suggest that millions of Republican women, especially the older women who have waited for this all their lives, might cross party lines to vote for the former Senator and Secretary of State? Who was one of the most liberal members of the Senate when she was there, despite what some people here think.
ontheissues.org
Lancero
(3,017 posts)I'd think that'd be a fine thing, unlike others who think more Republican voters is great. I might disagree with their choice of candidate ofc, but I'll - unlike many in this thread - admit that more Democratic voters is a good thing.
Still though, I find it funny that people try to claim the moral high ground for supporting Hillary's attempts to outreach to Republican women when they just before labeled them as thugs.
pnwmom
(109,021 posts)by the party they grew up with, and might realize this if HRC were the nominee.
And I distinguish between the thugs who run the party and many of the voters who joined a very different party decades ago.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)"We, as Democrats right now, should tap into the discontent of Republicans. I want some Obama Republicans!"
"We are bringing together Democrats and independents, and yes, some Republicans. I know there'sI meet them when I'm shaking hands afterwards. There's one right there. An Obamacan, that's what we call them."
Armstead
(47,803 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)for the Democratic Party. We certainly would not want to lessen the chances of a Republican winning!
What in hell is wrong with some of you?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)As long as they're women I guess it's different.
merrily
(45,251 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Martian to English translation:
If Republican men vote for Bernie: Bad!
If Republican women vote for Hillary: Good!
Makes perfect sense!
merrily
(45,251 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Loved everything about that movie.
merrily
(45,251 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Too funny, maybe she thinks Republican women's votes really are different.
merrily
(45,251 posts)not be the worst thing in the world for Democrats, after all. So out came the scattershot.
I'm pretty sure that, contrary to some reports, I've never once posted that it would be awful if Hillary got the votes of Republican women because I've been posting that I don't think she'll get Republican votes, let alone posted it countless times. smh
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)So if you're expecting intellectual honesty I wouldn't hold your breath.
merrily
(45,251 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Okay, got to go. I never meant to get started on this thread, anyway. Not sufficiently blessed and celebratory, LOL.
See you again another time.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Most of the time it's not. Like Barney Frank said it's like arguing with a dining room table.
Have a good one, merrily!
merrily
(45,251 posts)You know, there's a lot to be said for dining tables. For one thing, they very rarely claim to be couches. For another, I've never seen one flailing. For a third, they almost never go ad hom within 0 to 3 posts. But, I digress.....
Have fun.
pnwmom
(109,021 posts)What's wrong with luring Republican women -- millions of whom have been left behind by a party that has lurched to the far right -- to voting for a Democrat named Hillary Clinton instead of a Republican?
merrily
(45,251 posts)would think it a bad thing if Sanders lured Republicans to vote for him. Hmm. Maybe that makes it a straw man and a false equivalency. I'll have to think about that. But, your post contains at least one logical fallacy, that's for sure. Often happens when someone raises an issue, gets a response to the very point they raised, then wants to change the subject, maybe because the response was not what they expected.
pnwmom
(109,021 posts)about how she could get Republicans to vote for her, you'd be instantly saying something disparaging about Hillary.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I'm supposed to answer for everything I've ever posted on any thread you choose simply because you feel like raising something you claim a I posted in the past? Wowza.
If Hillary's supporters were bragging about how she could get Republicans to vote for her, you'd be instantly saying something disparaging about Hillary.
And now you have a crystal ball, too?
BTW, I believe it was Hillary's supporters, including you, who were disparaging Bernie because he allegedly claimed Republicans would vote for him. I responded to your implication that some Democrats might not like that and we're were off and running in 10 different directions at once. Nice way to turn around what you and MaggieD were doing to Bernie, though!
It never ends.
treestar
(82,383 posts)good grief!
treestar
(82,383 posts)"pandering to Republicans by taking conservative positions on issues."
merrily
(45,251 posts)that one of the reasons I don't want Hillary to be the nominee is that I don't think she can get Republican votes in the general, which the Democratic nominee may end up needing. Hope that helps.
pnwmom
(109,021 posts)which includes women, African Americans, and Latinos. Clinton does better than Sanders in all three groups.
merrily
(45,251 posts)times?" Because my recollection is that I never posted any such thing even once, let alone countless times.
Second, as far as Hillary holding the Democratic coalition together, LOL. People on this board have proven she is not going to be able to hold it together. It gets posted by both sides daily, Hillary supporters claiming the left will abandon Hillary, demanding loyalty oaths, etc. and many on DU's left swearing they would rather become human ant hills than vote for Hillary.
On the other hand, the groups you mention are highly unlikely to abandon any Democratic nominee. So, your post made a great case for nominating Bernie. I appreciate it. Please keep that kind of post coming.
pnwmom
(109,021 posts)People on DU have not proven anything except that it is possible to drive HRC supporters away from DU.
merrily
(45,251 posts)than your other claims. I can understand why you try to change the subject whenever you get a reply that blows your claim out of the water. It is a good strategy for you. Sooner or later, the antics are bound to bore the other person, and then you get to declare victory.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)for Manny posts? I hope he appreciates the attention. Personally I don't see it.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Bonus points for being the first while bringing up Reagan at the same time.
I think there's some sort of prize involved.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)while I think WillyT is running about 85%.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Which constantly refreshes my browser and alerts me to every new Manny post. Then I'm able to get the "coveted first response spot".
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)response spot, I assume thinking it has tactical advantages. I think it's hilarious that you guys/gals take it so seriously. I guess anything to distract from actually talking about issues.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,943 posts)What a terrible thing to do - to try to turn Republicans into Democrats!
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Rightly so.
On Thu Nov 26, 2015, 09:42 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Oh, the old "you're too stupid to understand" gambit
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=851858
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Earlier in the same thread she said she loathed Bernie; now she calls him a huckster. That is disruptive, rude, insensitive, over-the-top and rude, as far as I'm concerned. Leave it to the jury to judge.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Nov 26, 2015, 09:50 AM, and the Jury voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: MaggieD's vitriol is repulsive.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The earlier "He disgusts me" really makes me want to vote for Hillary in the General election IF she makes it there.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Much worse has been posted about Hillary and left to stand.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Sanders' supporters are the ones supposedly in control of jury decisions? I don't know how such a small minority manages to control so many jury decisions, but it sure does.
kath
(10,565 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)I just noticed that one of the jurors launched an ugly personal attack on a poster whom the juror either knew or imagined was the alerter. For that reason, I will not post the results.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Just like the third way/Clinton centered/"conservative Democrats have been attempting to do for decades?
And he did it by being the most honest leftest Democratic candidate despite of only lately joining the Democratic Party.
I bet those centrist Democrats who spectacularly failed to attract switch voters feel kinda inadequate now.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)As long as we're just making shit up
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)They got the candidate wrong.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)He even sucks at being a pimp, they gave him a D minus rating.
Not Good Enough, Bernie!
merrily
(45,251 posts)recent rating may have been D-. He does not, however, have a D-average.
As Governor, btw, Howard Dean, centrist and former head of the DNC, received an A rating from the NRA.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)They made up 'Bye bye Bernie' bumper stickers and mailed them out to members.
If he's a pimp for the NRA he really does suck at it.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)It is my duty to report to everyone that Bernie Sanders is possessed by the spirit of Eleanor Roosevelt.
(Sorry...Drudge was gonna figure it out sometime).
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Attention which, after all, is their main goal in the first place
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I don't think we're dealing with liberals here and if they're really Democrats I can see why they prefer Hillary.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I believe it.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)an Internet Warrior let their keyboard get out of control. Sheesh!
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)to be a loose cannon. That is, I trust him to be like the fireworks show in my hometown one year where one of the people in charge of the show lit a giant Roman candle with a short fuse, and in his haste to get away from it, tripped over it in such a way that it ended up being pointed directly at where all the unlit fireworks were being kept. Needless to say, fireworks started going off in all directions, and we onlookers had to scurry for cover.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Now who does that remind you of?
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Well, both of them are-- Trump, and his Vorgänger.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Anyway, did I mention to you that I juried a post today claiming that Trump would make a better President than Sanders? Vote was 2 to 5 to leave it!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I didn't alert because I knew it wouldn't get hidden, honestly after all the vile things said about Bernie nothing surprises me anymore.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)If they were so damn confident in their candidate why are they trying to "swift boat"
Bernie......answer their internal polling shows 2008 all over again and they are nervous
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)I'm a husband."
"I'm a grandfather."
"I'm a son of immigrants.
What is he trying to prove with all this gender talk? Why won't he tell us where he stands on non-gender issues, the ones that affect us ALL??
Does he think we're dumb enough to elect him for his XY chomosomes?
Lancero
(3,017 posts)Him being a ardent supporter of the MiC, because he voted to support our troops.
Apparently, some people have issues seeing the difference between voting to support a war, and voting to support the people we send off to war.
According to them, starting a war is great but making sure we have the funding to properly equip and feed our troops (so that they don't... you know... die?) is pure evil.
senz
(11,945 posts)Send 'em to Afghanistan for combat and then to their families for body armor.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Hang in there, Manny.
snot
(10,540 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I guess the extremists who are posting this crap just can't grasp the concept of a reasonable middle ground. Their loss.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Well, I dont want to start any rumors, but.........
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Just not anything there. Straws, grasping and all that.