Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Update on Rehtaeh Parsons case
A second young man has pled guilty in the child pornography case involving Rehtaeh Parsons, the 17-year-old Canadian girl who died last year after she was taken off life support following a suicide attempt. Her family says Parsons was bullied mercilessly after she was raped by two boys at a party when she was 15, bullying that eventually led to her death. One of the teens who took photos of her alleged rape pled guilty to manufacturing child pornography and was sentenced earlier this month to no jail time and no probation. The second, now 19, pled guilty yesterday to distributing child pornography. In reporting the plea, one Canadian newspaper, Halifax's Chronicle Herald, defied a ban on publishing Parsons' name, pointing out that her parents want her to be identified.
Parsons was identified by name in Canadian media reports around her death until earlier this year, when a judge ruled that since she's a victim of child pornography, she can't be identified. (Nor could her family use her name in an advertisement they tried to take out to call renewed attention to her case.)
The Canadian media resorted to referring to the Parsons case as "a high profile child pornography case," since they also can't use the names of the teens who disseminated the photos. (Anger over the ban led to the hashtag #YouKnowHerName, created by Canadian reporter Hilary Beaumont.) But in a lengthy editor's note, the Chronicle Herald said they would use Parsons name in defiance of the ban, for a variety of reasons:
. . .
Rehtaeh's family called the publication of her name "brave" on their Facebook page, writing, "Rehtaeh Parsons is her name and they know its not in the public interest and certainly not in Rehtaeh's interest to silence her... Show them our support." But today, the Chronicle Herald reports that they're being investigated by the police for violating the ban, after receiving numerous complaints from citizens.
Parsons was identified by name in Canadian media reports around her death until earlier this year, when a judge ruled that since she's a victim of child pornography, she can't be identified. (Nor could her family use her name in an advertisement they tried to take out to call renewed attention to her case.)
The Canadian media resorted to referring to the Parsons case as "a high profile child pornography case," since they also can't use the names of the teens who disseminated the photos. (Anger over the ban led to the hashtag #YouKnowHerName, created by Canadian reporter Hilary Beaumont.) But in a lengthy editor's note, the Chronicle Herald said they would use Parsons name in defiance of the ban, for a variety of reasons:
. . .
Rehtaeh's family called the publication of her name "brave" on their Facebook page, writing, "Rehtaeh Parsons is her name and they know its not in the public interest and certainly not in Rehtaeh's interest to silence her... Show them our support." But today, the Chronicle Herald reports that they're being investigated by the police for violating the ban, after receiving numerous complaints from citizens.
http://jezebel.com/defying-court-order-canadian-newspaper-publishes-retae-1663295526
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
